Cargando…
The what and how of video analysis research in rugby union: a critical review
BACKGROUND: Video analysis is a common tool used in rugby union research to describe match performance. Studies using video analysis range from broad statistical studies of commercial databases to in-depth case-studies of specific match events. The range of types of studies using video analysis in r...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29916055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0142-3 |
_version_ | 1783332775965753344 |
---|---|
author | den Hollander, Steve Jones, Ben Lambert, Michael Hendricks, Sharief |
author_facet | den Hollander, Steve Jones, Ben Lambert, Michael Hendricks, Sharief |
author_sort | den Hollander, Steve |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Video analysis is a common tool used in rugby union research to describe match performance. Studies using video analysis range from broad statistical studies of commercial databases to in-depth case-studies of specific match events. The range of types of studies using video analysis in rugby union, and how different studies apply the methodology, can make it difficult to compare the results of studies and translate the findings to a real-world setting. In attempt to consolidate the information on video analysis in rugby, a critical review of the literature was performed. MAIN BODY: Ninety-two studies were identified. The studies were categorised based on the outcome of the study and the type of research question, sub-categorised as ‘what’ and ‘how’ studies. Each study was reviewed using a number of questions related to the application of video analysis in research. There was a large range in the sample sizes of the studies reviewed, with some of the studies being under-powered. Concerns were raised of the generalisability of some of the samples. One hundred percent of ‘how’ studies included at least one contextual variables in their analyses, with 86% of ‘how’ studies including two or more contextual variables. These findings show that the majority of studies describing how events occur in matches attempted to provide context to their findings. The majority of studies (93%) provided practical applications for their findings. CONCLUSION: The review raised concerns about the usefulness of the some of the findings to coaches and practitioners. To facilitate the transfer and adoption of research findings into practice, the authors recommend that the results of ‘what’ studies inform the research questions of ‘how’ studies, and the findings of ‘how’ studies provide the practical applications for coaches and practitioners. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40798-018-0142-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6006008 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60060082018-07-03 The what and how of video analysis research in rugby union: a critical review den Hollander, Steve Jones, Ben Lambert, Michael Hendricks, Sharief Sports Med Open Review Article BACKGROUND: Video analysis is a common tool used in rugby union research to describe match performance. Studies using video analysis range from broad statistical studies of commercial databases to in-depth case-studies of specific match events. The range of types of studies using video analysis in rugby union, and how different studies apply the methodology, can make it difficult to compare the results of studies and translate the findings to a real-world setting. In attempt to consolidate the information on video analysis in rugby, a critical review of the literature was performed. MAIN BODY: Ninety-two studies were identified. The studies were categorised based on the outcome of the study and the type of research question, sub-categorised as ‘what’ and ‘how’ studies. Each study was reviewed using a number of questions related to the application of video analysis in research. There was a large range in the sample sizes of the studies reviewed, with some of the studies being under-powered. Concerns were raised of the generalisability of some of the samples. One hundred percent of ‘how’ studies included at least one contextual variables in their analyses, with 86% of ‘how’ studies including two or more contextual variables. These findings show that the majority of studies describing how events occur in matches attempted to provide context to their findings. The majority of studies (93%) provided practical applications for their findings. CONCLUSION: The review raised concerns about the usefulness of the some of the findings to coaches and practitioners. To facilitate the transfer and adoption of research findings into practice, the authors recommend that the results of ‘what’ studies inform the research questions of ‘how’ studies, and the findings of ‘how’ studies provide the practical applications for coaches and practitioners. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40798-018-0142-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6006008/ /pubmed/29916055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0142-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article den Hollander, Steve Jones, Ben Lambert, Michael Hendricks, Sharief The what and how of video analysis research in rugby union: a critical review |
title | The what and how of video analysis research in rugby union: a critical review |
title_full | The what and how of video analysis research in rugby union: a critical review |
title_fullStr | The what and how of video analysis research in rugby union: a critical review |
title_full_unstemmed | The what and how of video analysis research in rugby union: a critical review |
title_short | The what and how of video analysis research in rugby union: a critical review |
title_sort | what and how of video analysis research in rugby union: a critical review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29916055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0142-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT denhollandersteve thewhatandhowofvideoanalysisresearchinrugbyunionacriticalreview AT jonesben thewhatandhowofvideoanalysisresearchinrugbyunionacriticalreview AT lambertmichael thewhatandhowofvideoanalysisresearchinrugbyunionacriticalreview AT hendrickssharief thewhatandhowofvideoanalysisresearchinrugbyunionacriticalreview AT denhollandersteve whatandhowofvideoanalysisresearchinrugbyunionacriticalreview AT jonesben whatandhowofvideoanalysisresearchinrugbyunionacriticalreview AT lambertmichael whatandhowofvideoanalysisresearchinrugbyunionacriticalreview AT hendrickssharief whatandhowofvideoanalysisresearchinrugbyunionacriticalreview |