Cargando…

Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy

Immunotherapies comprise of a class of cancer therapies that are increasingly used for treatment of several cancer entities. Active immunotherapies encompassing immune checkpoint inhibitors are the most widespread class of immunotherapies, with indications for melanoma, non-small lung cancer, renal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beer, Lucian, Hochmair, Maximilian, Prosch, Helmut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12254-018-0389-x
_version_ 1783332807097974784
author Beer, Lucian
Hochmair, Maximilian
Prosch, Helmut
author_facet Beer, Lucian
Hochmair, Maximilian
Prosch, Helmut
author_sort Beer, Lucian
collection PubMed
description Immunotherapies comprise of a class of cancer therapies that are increasingly used for treatment of several cancer entities. Active immunotherapies encompassing immune checkpoint inhibitors are the most widespread class of immunotherapies, with indications for melanoma, non-small lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated unique response patterns that are not adequately captured by traditional response criteria such das the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and World Health Organization criteria. Consequently, adaptions of these criteria have been released such as the immune-related RECIST and immune RECIST, which account for the specialities of immunotherapies. Immunotherapies can cause a distinct set of adverse events such as pneumonitis, colitis, and hypophysitis. In addition, atypical treatment response patterns termed pseudoprogression have been observed. Thereby, new or enlarging lesions appear after treatment start and mimic tumor progression, which is followed by an eventual decrease in total tumor burden. In this review article we will describe pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapies, focusing on pseudoprogression and imaging appearances of common immune-related adverse events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6006274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60062742018-07-04 Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy Beer, Lucian Hochmair, Maximilian Prosch, Helmut Memo Short Review Immunotherapies comprise of a class of cancer therapies that are increasingly used for treatment of several cancer entities. Active immunotherapies encompassing immune checkpoint inhibitors are the most widespread class of immunotherapies, with indications for melanoma, non-small lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated unique response patterns that are not adequately captured by traditional response criteria such das the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and World Health Organization criteria. Consequently, adaptions of these criteria have been released such as the immune-related RECIST and immune RECIST, which account for the specialities of immunotherapies. Immunotherapies can cause a distinct set of adverse events such as pneumonitis, colitis, and hypophysitis. In addition, atypical treatment response patterns termed pseudoprogression have been observed. Thereby, new or enlarging lesions appear after treatment start and mimic tumor progression, which is followed by an eventual decrease in total tumor burden. In this review article we will describe pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapies, focusing on pseudoprogression and imaging appearances of common immune-related adverse events. Springer Vienna 2018-03-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6006274/ /pubmed/29983829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12254-018-0389-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Short Review
Beer, Lucian
Hochmair, Maximilian
Prosch, Helmut
Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy
title Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy
title_full Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy
title_fullStr Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy
title_short Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy
title_sort pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy
topic Short Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12254-018-0389-x
work_keys_str_mv AT beerlucian pitfallsintheradiologicalresponseassessmentofimmunotherapy
AT hochmairmaximilian pitfallsintheradiologicalresponseassessmentofimmunotherapy
AT proschhelmut pitfallsintheradiologicalresponseassessmentofimmunotherapy