Cargando…
Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy
Immunotherapies comprise of a class of cancer therapies that are increasingly used for treatment of several cancer entities. Active immunotherapies encompassing immune checkpoint inhibitors are the most widespread class of immunotherapies, with indications for melanoma, non-small lung cancer, renal...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12254-018-0389-x |
_version_ | 1783332807097974784 |
---|---|
author | Beer, Lucian Hochmair, Maximilian Prosch, Helmut |
author_facet | Beer, Lucian Hochmair, Maximilian Prosch, Helmut |
author_sort | Beer, Lucian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Immunotherapies comprise of a class of cancer therapies that are increasingly used for treatment of several cancer entities. Active immunotherapies encompassing immune checkpoint inhibitors are the most widespread class of immunotherapies, with indications for melanoma, non-small lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated unique response patterns that are not adequately captured by traditional response criteria such das the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and World Health Organization criteria. Consequently, adaptions of these criteria have been released such as the immune-related RECIST and immune RECIST, which account for the specialities of immunotherapies. Immunotherapies can cause a distinct set of adverse events such as pneumonitis, colitis, and hypophysitis. In addition, atypical treatment response patterns termed pseudoprogression have been observed. Thereby, new or enlarging lesions appear after treatment start and mimic tumor progression, which is followed by an eventual decrease in total tumor burden. In this review article we will describe pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapies, focusing on pseudoprogression and imaging appearances of common immune-related adverse events. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6006274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60062742018-07-04 Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy Beer, Lucian Hochmair, Maximilian Prosch, Helmut Memo Short Review Immunotherapies comprise of a class of cancer therapies that are increasingly used for treatment of several cancer entities. Active immunotherapies encompassing immune checkpoint inhibitors are the most widespread class of immunotherapies, with indications for melanoma, non-small lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated unique response patterns that are not adequately captured by traditional response criteria such das the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and World Health Organization criteria. Consequently, adaptions of these criteria have been released such as the immune-related RECIST and immune RECIST, which account for the specialities of immunotherapies. Immunotherapies can cause a distinct set of adverse events such as pneumonitis, colitis, and hypophysitis. In addition, atypical treatment response patterns termed pseudoprogression have been observed. Thereby, new or enlarging lesions appear after treatment start and mimic tumor progression, which is followed by an eventual decrease in total tumor burden. In this review article we will describe pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapies, focusing on pseudoprogression and imaging appearances of common immune-related adverse events. Springer Vienna 2018-03-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6006274/ /pubmed/29983829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12254-018-0389-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Short Review Beer, Lucian Hochmair, Maximilian Prosch, Helmut Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy |
title | Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy |
title_full | Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy |
title_fullStr | Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy |
title_short | Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy |
title_sort | pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy |
topic | Short Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12254-018-0389-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beerlucian pitfallsintheradiologicalresponseassessmentofimmunotherapy AT hochmairmaximilian pitfallsintheradiologicalresponseassessmentofimmunotherapy AT proschhelmut pitfallsintheradiologicalresponseassessmentofimmunotherapy |