Cargando…

Comparison of synthetic aperture architectures for miniaturised ultrasound imaging front-ends

BACKGROUND: Point of care ultrasonography has been the focus of extensive research over the past few decades. Miniaturised, wireless systems have been envisaged for new application areas, such as capsule endoscopy, implantable ultrasound and wearable ultrasound. The hardware constraints of such smal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peyton, Graham, Boutelle, Martyn G., Drakakis, Emmanuel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29914479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0512-6
_version_ 1783332868514119680
author Peyton, Graham
Boutelle, Martyn G.
Drakakis, Emmanuel M.
author_facet Peyton, Graham
Boutelle, Martyn G.
Drakakis, Emmanuel M.
author_sort Peyton, Graham
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Point of care ultrasonography has been the focus of extensive research over the past few decades. Miniaturised, wireless systems have been envisaged for new application areas, such as capsule endoscopy, implantable ultrasound and wearable ultrasound. The hardware constraints of such small-scale systems are severe, and tradeoffs between power consumption, size, data bandwidth and cost must be carefully balanced. METHODS: In this work, two receiver architectures are proposed and compared to address these challenges. Both architectures uniquely combine low-rate sampling with synthetic aperture beamforming to reduce the data bandwidth and system complexity. The first architecture involves the use of quadrature sampling to minimise the signal bandwidth and computational load. Synthetic aperture beamforming (SAB) is carried out using a single-channel, pipelined protocol suitable for implementation on an FPGA/ASIC. The second architecture employs compressive sensing within the finite rate of innovation framework to further reduce the bandwidth. Low-rate signals are transmitted to a computational back-end (computer), which sequentially reconstructs each signal and carries out beamforming. RESULTS: Both architectures were tested using a custom hardware front-end and synthetic aperture database to yield B-mode images. The normalised root-mean-squared-error between the quadrature SAB image and the RF reference image was [Formula: see text] while the compressive SAB error was [Formula: see text] for the same degree of spatial compounding. The sampling rate is reduced by a factor of 2 (quadrature SAB) and 4.7 (compressive SAB), compared to the RF sampling rate. The quadrature method is implemented on FPGA, with a total power consumption of [Formula: see text] mW, which is comparable to state-of-the-art hardware topologies, but with significantly reduced circuit area. CONCLUSIONS: Through a novel combination of SAB and low-rate sampling techniques, the proposed architectures achieve a significant reduction in data transmission rate, system complexity and digital/analogue circuit area. This allows for aggressive miniaturisation of the imaging front-end in portable imaging applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6006598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60065982018-06-26 Comparison of synthetic aperture architectures for miniaturised ultrasound imaging front-ends Peyton, Graham Boutelle, Martyn G. Drakakis, Emmanuel M. Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Point of care ultrasonography has been the focus of extensive research over the past few decades. Miniaturised, wireless systems have been envisaged for new application areas, such as capsule endoscopy, implantable ultrasound and wearable ultrasound. The hardware constraints of such small-scale systems are severe, and tradeoffs between power consumption, size, data bandwidth and cost must be carefully balanced. METHODS: In this work, two receiver architectures are proposed and compared to address these challenges. Both architectures uniquely combine low-rate sampling with synthetic aperture beamforming to reduce the data bandwidth and system complexity. The first architecture involves the use of quadrature sampling to minimise the signal bandwidth and computational load. Synthetic aperture beamforming (SAB) is carried out using a single-channel, pipelined protocol suitable for implementation on an FPGA/ASIC. The second architecture employs compressive sensing within the finite rate of innovation framework to further reduce the bandwidth. Low-rate signals are transmitted to a computational back-end (computer), which sequentially reconstructs each signal and carries out beamforming. RESULTS: Both architectures were tested using a custom hardware front-end and synthetic aperture database to yield B-mode images. The normalised root-mean-squared-error between the quadrature SAB image and the RF reference image was [Formula: see text] while the compressive SAB error was [Formula: see text] for the same degree of spatial compounding. The sampling rate is reduced by a factor of 2 (quadrature SAB) and 4.7 (compressive SAB), compared to the RF sampling rate. The quadrature method is implemented on FPGA, with a total power consumption of [Formula: see text] mW, which is comparable to state-of-the-art hardware topologies, but with significantly reduced circuit area. CONCLUSIONS: Through a novel combination of SAB and low-rate sampling techniques, the proposed architectures achieve a significant reduction in data transmission rate, system complexity and digital/analogue circuit area. This allows for aggressive miniaturisation of the imaging front-end in portable imaging applications. BioMed Central 2018-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6006598/ /pubmed/29914479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0512-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Peyton, Graham
Boutelle, Martyn G.
Drakakis, Emmanuel M.
Comparison of synthetic aperture architectures for miniaturised ultrasound imaging front-ends
title Comparison of synthetic aperture architectures for miniaturised ultrasound imaging front-ends
title_full Comparison of synthetic aperture architectures for miniaturised ultrasound imaging front-ends
title_fullStr Comparison of synthetic aperture architectures for miniaturised ultrasound imaging front-ends
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of synthetic aperture architectures for miniaturised ultrasound imaging front-ends
title_short Comparison of synthetic aperture architectures for miniaturised ultrasound imaging front-ends
title_sort comparison of synthetic aperture architectures for miniaturised ultrasound imaging front-ends
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29914479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0512-6
work_keys_str_mv AT peytongraham comparisonofsyntheticaperturearchitecturesforminiaturisedultrasoundimagingfrontends
AT boutellemartyng comparisonofsyntheticaperturearchitecturesforminiaturisedultrasoundimagingfrontends
AT drakakisemmanuelm comparisonofsyntheticaperturearchitecturesforminiaturisedultrasoundimagingfrontends