Cargando…

Peers versus professional training of basic life support in Syria: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Peer training has been identified as a useful tool for delivering undergraduate training in basic life support (BLS) which is fundamental as an initial response in cases of emergency. This study aimed to (1) Evaluate the efficacy of peer-led model in basic life support training among med...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abbas, Fatima, Sawaf, Bisher, Hanafi, Ibrahem, Hajeer, Mohammad Younis, Zakaria, Mhd Ismael, Abbas, Wafaa, Alabdeh, Fadi, Ibrahim, Nazir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29914441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1241-z
_version_ 1783332888320671744
author Abbas, Fatima
Sawaf, Bisher
Hanafi, Ibrahem
Hajeer, Mohammad Younis
Zakaria, Mhd Ismael
Abbas, Wafaa
Alabdeh, Fadi
Ibrahim, Nazir
author_facet Abbas, Fatima
Sawaf, Bisher
Hanafi, Ibrahem
Hajeer, Mohammad Younis
Zakaria, Mhd Ismael
Abbas, Wafaa
Alabdeh, Fadi
Ibrahim, Nazir
author_sort Abbas, Fatima
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peer training has been identified as a useful tool for delivering undergraduate training in basic life support (BLS) which is fundamental as an initial response in cases of emergency. This study aimed to (1) Evaluate the efficacy of peer-led model in basic life support training among medical students in their first three years of study, compared to professional-led training and (2) To assess the efficacy of the course program and students’ satisfaction of peer-led training. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with blinded assessors was conducted on 72 medical students from the pre-clinical years (1st to 3rd years in Syria) at Syrian Private University. Students were randomly assigned to peer-led or to professional-led training group for one-day-course of basic life support skills. Sixty-four students who underwent checklist based assessment using objective structured clinical examination design (OSCE) (practical assessment of BLS skills) and answered BLS knowledge checkpoint-questionnaire were included in the analysis. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in delivering BLS skills to medical students in practical (P = 0.850) and BLS knowledge questionnaire outcomes (P = 0.900). Both groups showed statistically significant improvement from pre- to post-course assessment with significant statistical difference in both practical skills and theoretical knowledge (P-Value < 0.001). Students were satisfied with the peer model of training. CONCLUSION: Peer-led training of basic life support for medical students was beneficial and it provided a quality of education which was as effective as training conducted by professionals. This method is applicable and desirable especially in poor-resource countries and in crisis situation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1241-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6006697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60066972018-06-26 Peers versus professional training of basic life support in Syria: a randomized controlled trial Abbas, Fatima Sawaf, Bisher Hanafi, Ibrahem Hajeer, Mohammad Younis Zakaria, Mhd Ismael Abbas, Wafaa Alabdeh, Fadi Ibrahim, Nazir BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Peer training has been identified as a useful tool for delivering undergraduate training in basic life support (BLS) which is fundamental as an initial response in cases of emergency. This study aimed to (1) Evaluate the efficacy of peer-led model in basic life support training among medical students in their first three years of study, compared to professional-led training and (2) To assess the efficacy of the course program and students’ satisfaction of peer-led training. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with blinded assessors was conducted on 72 medical students from the pre-clinical years (1st to 3rd years in Syria) at Syrian Private University. Students were randomly assigned to peer-led or to professional-led training group for one-day-course of basic life support skills. Sixty-four students who underwent checklist based assessment using objective structured clinical examination design (OSCE) (practical assessment of BLS skills) and answered BLS knowledge checkpoint-questionnaire were included in the analysis. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in delivering BLS skills to medical students in practical (P = 0.850) and BLS knowledge questionnaire outcomes (P = 0.900). Both groups showed statistically significant improvement from pre- to post-course assessment with significant statistical difference in both practical skills and theoretical knowledge (P-Value < 0.001). Students were satisfied with the peer model of training. CONCLUSION: Peer-led training of basic life support for medical students was beneficial and it provided a quality of education which was as effective as training conducted by professionals. This method is applicable and desirable especially in poor-resource countries and in crisis situation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1241-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6006697/ /pubmed/29914441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1241-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abbas, Fatima
Sawaf, Bisher
Hanafi, Ibrahem
Hajeer, Mohammad Younis
Zakaria, Mhd Ismael
Abbas, Wafaa
Alabdeh, Fadi
Ibrahim, Nazir
Peers versus professional training of basic life support in Syria: a randomized controlled trial
title Peers versus professional training of basic life support in Syria: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Peers versus professional training of basic life support in Syria: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Peers versus professional training of basic life support in Syria: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Peers versus professional training of basic life support in Syria: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Peers versus professional training of basic life support in Syria: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort peers versus professional training of basic life support in syria: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29914441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1241-z
work_keys_str_mv AT abbasfatima peersversusprofessionaltrainingofbasiclifesupportinsyriaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sawafbisher peersversusprofessionaltrainingofbasiclifesupportinsyriaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hanafiibrahem peersversusprofessionaltrainingofbasiclifesupportinsyriaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hajeermohammadyounis peersversusprofessionaltrainingofbasiclifesupportinsyriaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zakariamhdismael peersversusprofessionaltrainingofbasiclifesupportinsyriaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT abbaswafaa peersversusprofessionaltrainingofbasiclifesupportinsyriaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT alabdehfadi peersversusprofessionaltrainingofbasiclifesupportinsyriaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ibrahimnazir peersversusprofessionaltrainingofbasiclifesupportinsyriaarandomizedcontrolledtrial