Cargando…

The value of necropsy reports for animal health surveillance

BACKGROUND: Animal health data recorded in free text, such as in necropsy reports, can have valuable information for national surveillance systems. However, these data are rarely utilized because the text format requires labor-intensive classification of records before they can be analyzed with usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Küker, Susanne, Faverjon, Celine, Furrer, Lenz, Berezowski, John, Posthaus, Horst, Rinaldi, Fabio, Vial, Flavie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29914502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1505-1
_version_ 1783332896430358528
author Küker, Susanne
Faverjon, Celine
Furrer, Lenz
Berezowski, John
Posthaus, Horst
Rinaldi, Fabio
Vial, Flavie
author_facet Küker, Susanne
Faverjon, Celine
Furrer, Lenz
Berezowski, John
Posthaus, Horst
Rinaldi, Fabio
Vial, Flavie
author_sort Küker, Susanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Animal health data recorded in free text, such as in necropsy reports, can have valuable information for national surveillance systems. However, these data are rarely utilized because the text format requires labor-intensive classification of records before they can be analyzed with using statistical or other software. In a previous study, we designed a text-mining tool to extract data from text in necropsy reports. In the current study, we used the tool to extract data from the reports from pig and cattle necropsies performed between 2000 and 2011 at the Institute of Animal Pathology (ITPA), University of Bern, Switzerland. We evaluated data quality in terms of credibility, completeness and representativeness of the Swiss pig and cattle populations. RESULTS: Data was easily extracted from necropsy reports. Data quality in terms of completeness and validity varied a lot depending on the type of data reported. Diseases of the gastrointestinal system were reported most frequently (54.6% of pig submissions and 40.8% of cattle submissions). Diseases affecting serous membranes were reported in 16.0% of necropsied pigs and 27.6% of cattle. Respiratory diseases were reported in 18.3% of pigs and 21.6% of cattle submissions. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that extracting data from necropsy reports can provide information of value for animal health surveillance. This data has potential value for monitoring endemic disease syndromes in different age and production groups, or for early detection of emerging or re-emerging diseases. The study identified data entry and other errors that could be corrected to improve the quality and validity of the data. Submissions to veterinary diagnostic laboratories have selection biases and these should be considered when designing surveillance systems that include necropsy reports. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-018-1505-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6006731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60067312018-06-26 The value of necropsy reports for animal health surveillance Küker, Susanne Faverjon, Celine Furrer, Lenz Berezowski, John Posthaus, Horst Rinaldi, Fabio Vial, Flavie BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Animal health data recorded in free text, such as in necropsy reports, can have valuable information for national surveillance systems. However, these data are rarely utilized because the text format requires labor-intensive classification of records before they can be analyzed with using statistical or other software. In a previous study, we designed a text-mining tool to extract data from text in necropsy reports. In the current study, we used the tool to extract data from the reports from pig and cattle necropsies performed between 2000 and 2011 at the Institute of Animal Pathology (ITPA), University of Bern, Switzerland. We evaluated data quality in terms of credibility, completeness and representativeness of the Swiss pig and cattle populations. RESULTS: Data was easily extracted from necropsy reports. Data quality in terms of completeness and validity varied a lot depending on the type of data reported. Diseases of the gastrointestinal system were reported most frequently (54.6% of pig submissions and 40.8% of cattle submissions). Diseases affecting serous membranes were reported in 16.0% of necropsied pigs and 27.6% of cattle. Respiratory diseases were reported in 18.3% of pigs and 21.6% of cattle submissions. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that extracting data from necropsy reports can provide information of value for animal health surveillance. This data has potential value for monitoring endemic disease syndromes in different age and production groups, or for early detection of emerging or re-emerging diseases. The study identified data entry and other errors that could be corrected to improve the quality and validity of the data. Submissions to veterinary diagnostic laboratories have selection biases and these should be considered when designing surveillance systems that include necropsy reports. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-018-1505-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6006731/ /pubmed/29914502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1505-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Küker, Susanne
Faverjon, Celine
Furrer, Lenz
Berezowski, John
Posthaus, Horst
Rinaldi, Fabio
Vial, Flavie
The value of necropsy reports for animal health surveillance
title The value of necropsy reports for animal health surveillance
title_full The value of necropsy reports for animal health surveillance
title_fullStr The value of necropsy reports for animal health surveillance
title_full_unstemmed The value of necropsy reports for animal health surveillance
title_short The value of necropsy reports for animal health surveillance
title_sort value of necropsy reports for animal health surveillance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29914502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1505-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kukersusanne thevalueofnecropsyreportsforanimalhealthsurveillance
AT faverjonceline thevalueofnecropsyreportsforanimalhealthsurveillance
AT furrerlenz thevalueofnecropsyreportsforanimalhealthsurveillance
AT berezowskijohn thevalueofnecropsyreportsforanimalhealthsurveillance
AT posthaushorst thevalueofnecropsyreportsforanimalhealthsurveillance
AT rinaldifabio thevalueofnecropsyreportsforanimalhealthsurveillance
AT vialflavie thevalueofnecropsyreportsforanimalhealthsurveillance
AT kukersusanne valueofnecropsyreportsforanimalhealthsurveillance
AT faverjonceline valueofnecropsyreportsforanimalhealthsurveillance
AT furrerlenz valueofnecropsyreportsforanimalhealthsurveillance
AT berezowskijohn valueofnecropsyreportsforanimalhealthsurveillance
AT posthaushorst valueofnecropsyreportsforanimalhealthsurveillance
AT rinaldifabio valueofnecropsyreportsforanimalhealthsurveillance
AT vialflavie valueofnecropsyreportsforanimalhealthsurveillance