Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs
BACKGROUND: The occurrence of secondary caries is the most common reason for the restorations failures. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the anticaries effect of copper ions on the teeth restored with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and composite restorations in the cavity prepared b...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29962759 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_801_17 |
_version_ | 1783332934174900224 |
---|---|
author | Rathi, Nilesh V. Chandak, Manoj G. Mude, Gargi A. |
author_facet | Rathi, Nilesh V. Chandak, Manoj G. Mude, Gargi A. |
author_sort | Rathi, Nilesh V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The occurrence of secondary caries is the most common reason for the restorations failures. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the anticaries effect of copper ions on the teeth restored with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and composite restorations in the cavity prepared by galvanic and sintered burs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 premolars were divided into two halves buccolingually. Class V cavity was prepared with sintered diamond burs and galvanic diamond bur. Cavities were restored with either GIC or composite resin. The monospecies artificial microbial caries model was selected for induction of secondary caries. The lesions were measured at junction of restoration by confocal laser scanning microscope. RESULTS: The results were statistically significant (P < 0.001) and suggested that the width of lesion was lowest in cavity prepared by sintered bur and restored with composite resin. CONCLUSION: The use of different burs in combination with various restorative materials influence the occurrence and width of caries lesion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6006890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60068902018-06-29 Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs Rathi, Nilesh V. Chandak, Manoj G. Mude, Gargi A. Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: The occurrence of secondary caries is the most common reason for the restorations failures. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the anticaries effect of copper ions on the teeth restored with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and composite restorations in the cavity prepared by galvanic and sintered burs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 premolars were divided into two halves buccolingually. Class V cavity was prepared with sintered diamond burs and galvanic diamond bur. Cavities were restored with either GIC or composite resin. The monospecies artificial microbial caries model was selected for induction of secondary caries. The lesions were measured at junction of restoration by confocal laser scanning microscope. RESULTS: The results were statistically significant (P < 0.001) and suggested that the width of lesion was lowest in cavity prepared by sintered bur and restored with composite resin. CONCLUSION: The use of different burs in combination with various restorative materials influence the occurrence and width of caries lesion. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6006890/ /pubmed/29962759 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_801_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rathi, Nilesh V. Chandak, Manoj G. Mude, Gargi A. Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of dentinal caries in restored cavity prepared by galvanic and sintered burs |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29962759 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_801_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rathinileshv comparativeevaluationofdentinalcariesinrestoredcavitypreparedbygalvanicandsinteredburs AT chandakmanojg comparativeevaluationofdentinalcariesinrestoredcavitypreparedbygalvanicandsinteredburs AT mudegargia comparativeevaluationofdentinalcariesinrestoredcavitypreparedbygalvanicandsinteredburs |