Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of secondary caries is the most common reason for the restorations failures. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the anticaries effect of copper ions on the teeth restored with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and composite restorations in the cavity prepared b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rathi, Nilesh V., Chandak, Manoj G., Mude, Gargi A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29962759
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_801_17
_version_ 1783332934174900224
author Rathi, Nilesh V.
Chandak, Manoj G.
Mude, Gargi A.
author_facet Rathi, Nilesh V.
Chandak, Manoj G.
Mude, Gargi A.
author_sort Rathi, Nilesh V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The occurrence of secondary caries is the most common reason for the restorations failures. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the anticaries effect of copper ions on the teeth restored with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and composite restorations in the cavity prepared by galvanic and sintered burs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 premolars were divided into two halves buccolingually. Class V cavity was prepared with sintered diamond burs and galvanic diamond bur. Cavities were restored with either GIC or composite resin. The monospecies artificial microbial caries model was selected for induction of secondary caries. The lesions were measured at junction of restoration by confocal laser scanning microscope. RESULTS: The results were statistically significant (P < 0.001) and suggested that the width of lesion was lowest in cavity prepared by sintered bur and restored with composite resin. CONCLUSION: The use of different burs in combination with various restorative materials influence the occurrence and width of caries lesion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6006890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60068902018-06-29 Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs Rathi, Nilesh V. Chandak, Manoj G. Mude, Gargi A. Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: The occurrence of secondary caries is the most common reason for the restorations failures. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the anticaries effect of copper ions on the teeth restored with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and composite restorations in the cavity prepared by galvanic and sintered burs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 premolars were divided into two halves buccolingually. Class V cavity was prepared with sintered diamond burs and galvanic diamond bur. Cavities were restored with either GIC or composite resin. The monospecies artificial microbial caries model was selected for induction of secondary caries. The lesions were measured at junction of restoration by confocal laser scanning microscope. RESULTS: The results were statistically significant (P < 0.001) and suggested that the width of lesion was lowest in cavity prepared by sintered bur and restored with composite resin. CONCLUSION: The use of different burs in combination with various restorative materials influence the occurrence and width of caries lesion. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6006890/ /pubmed/29962759 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_801_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rathi, Nilesh V.
Chandak, Manoj G.
Mude, Gargi A.
Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs
title Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Caries in Restored Cavity Prepared By Galvanic and Sintered Burs
title_sort comparative evaluation of dentinal caries in restored cavity prepared by galvanic and sintered burs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29962759
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_801_17
work_keys_str_mv AT rathinileshv comparativeevaluationofdentinalcariesinrestoredcavitypreparedbygalvanicandsinteredburs
AT chandakmanojg comparativeevaluationofdentinalcariesinrestoredcavitypreparedbygalvanicandsinteredburs
AT mudegargia comparativeevaluationofdentinalcariesinrestoredcavitypreparedbygalvanicandsinteredburs