Cargando…

Reply to the ‘Comment on “A quantitative definition of hypervalency”’ by R. D. Harcourt and T. M. Klapötke, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, DOI: ; 10.1039/C5SC04866D

[Image: see text] The Lewis and quantum mechanical theories of chemical bonding are compared and contrasted, with a view to clarifying the relationship between Harcourt’s ‘increased valence’ quantum approach and the recently proposed quantitative definition of hypervalency.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Durrant, Marcus C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29999044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6sc00859c
_version_ 1783332971524128768
author Durrant, Marcus C.
author_facet Durrant, Marcus C.
author_sort Durrant, Marcus C.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The Lewis and quantum mechanical theories of chemical bonding are compared and contrasted, with a view to clarifying the relationship between Harcourt’s ‘increased valence’ quantum approach and the recently proposed quantitative definition of hypervalency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6007093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60070932018-07-11 Reply to the ‘Comment on “A quantitative definition of hypervalency”’ by R. D. Harcourt and T. M. Klapötke, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, DOI: ; 10.1039/C5SC04866D Durrant, Marcus C. Chem Sci Chemistry [Image: see text] The Lewis and quantum mechanical theories of chemical bonding are compared and contrasted, with a view to clarifying the relationship between Harcourt’s ‘increased valence’ quantum approach and the recently proposed quantitative definition of hypervalency. Royal Society of Chemistry 2016-05-01 2016-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6007093/ /pubmed/29999044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6sc00859c Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is freely available. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence (CC BY 3.0)
spellingShingle Chemistry
Durrant, Marcus C.
Reply to the ‘Comment on “A quantitative definition of hypervalency”’ by R. D. Harcourt and T. M. Klapötke, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, DOI: ; 10.1039/C5SC04866D
title Reply to the ‘Comment on “A quantitative definition of hypervalency”’ by R. D. Harcourt and T. M. Klapötke, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, DOI: ; 10.1039/C5SC04866D
title_full Reply to the ‘Comment on “A quantitative definition of hypervalency”’ by R. D. Harcourt and T. M. Klapötke, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, DOI: ; 10.1039/C5SC04866D
title_fullStr Reply to the ‘Comment on “A quantitative definition of hypervalency”’ by R. D. Harcourt and T. M. Klapötke, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, DOI: ; 10.1039/C5SC04866D
title_full_unstemmed Reply to the ‘Comment on “A quantitative definition of hypervalency”’ by R. D. Harcourt and T. M. Klapötke, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, DOI: ; 10.1039/C5SC04866D
title_short Reply to the ‘Comment on “A quantitative definition of hypervalency”’ by R. D. Harcourt and T. M. Klapötke, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, DOI: ; 10.1039/C5SC04866D
title_sort reply to the ‘comment on “a quantitative definition of hypervalency”’ by r. d. harcourt and t. m. klapötke, chem. sci., 2016, 7, doi: ; 10.1039/c5sc04866d
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29999044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6sc00859c
work_keys_str_mv AT durrantmarcusc replytothecommentonaquantitativedefinitionofhypervalencybyrdharcourtandtmklapotkechemsci20167doi101039c5sc04866d