Cargando…

Effects of Ceftiofur and Chlortetracycline on the Resistomes of Feedlot Cattle

Treatment of food-producing animals with antimicrobial drugs (AMD) is controversial because of concerns regarding promotion of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). To investigate this concern, resistance genes in metagenomic bovine fecal samples during a clinical trial were analyzed to assess the impacts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinroth, Margaret D., Scott, H. Morgan, Norby, Bo, Loneragan, Guy H., Noyes, Noelle R., Rovira, Pablo, Doster, Enrique, Yang, Xiang, Woerner, Dale R., Morley, Paul S., Belk, Keith E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29728379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00610-18
_version_ 1783332972254986240
author Weinroth, Margaret D.
Scott, H. Morgan
Norby, Bo
Loneragan, Guy H.
Noyes, Noelle R.
Rovira, Pablo
Doster, Enrique
Yang, Xiang
Woerner, Dale R.
Morley, Paul S.
Belk, Keith E.
author_facet Weinroth, Margaret D.
Scott, H. Morgan
Norby, Bo
Loneragan, Guy H.
Noyes, Noelle R.
Rovira, Pablo
Doster, Enrique
Yang, Xiang
Woerner, Dale R.
Morley, Paul S.
Belk, Keith E.
author_sort Weinroth, Margaret D.
collection PubMed
description Treatment of food-producing animals with antimicrobial drugs (AMD) is controversial because of concerns regarding promotion of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). To investigate this concern, resistance genes in metagenomic bovine fecal samples during a clinical trial were analyzed to assess the impacts of treatment on beef feedlot cattle resistomes. Four groups of cattle were exposed, using a 2-by-2 factorial design, to different regimens of antimicrobial treatment. Injections of ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (a third-generation cephalosporin) were used to treat all cattle in treatment pens or only a single animal, and either chlortetracycline was included in the feed of all cattle in a pen or the feed was untreated. On days 0 and 26, respectively, pre- and posttrial fecal samples were collected, and resistance genes were characterized using shotgun metagenomics. Treatment with ceftiofur was not associated with changes to β-lactam resistance genes. However, cattle fed chlortetracycline had a significant increase in relative abundance of tetracycline resistance genes. There was also an increase of an AMR class not administered during the study, which is a possible indicator of coselection of resistance genes. Samples analyzed in this study had previously been evaluated by culture characterization (Escherichia coli and Salmonella) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) of metagenomic fecal DNA, which allowed comparison of results with this study. In the majority of samples, genes that were selectively enriched through culture and qPCR were not identified through shotgun metagenomic sequencing in this study, suggesting that changes previously documented did not reflect changes affecting the majority of bacterial genetic elements found in the predominant fecal resistome. IMPORTANCE Despite significant concerns about public health implications of AMR in relation to use of AMD in food animals, there are many unknowns about the long- and short-term impact of common uses of AMD for treatment, control, and prevention of disease. Additionally, questions commonly arise regarding how to best measure and quantify AMR genes in relation to public health risks and how to determine which genes are most important. These data provide an introductory view of the utility of using shotgun metagenomic sequencing data as an outcome for clinical trials evaluating the impact of using AMD in food animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6007121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60071212018-06-27 Effects of Ceftiofur and Chlortetracycline on the Resistomes of Feedlot Cattle Weinroth, Margaret D. Scott, H. Morgan Norby, Bo Loneragan, Guy H. Noyes, Noelle R. Rovira, Pablo Doster, Enrique Yang, Xiang Woerner, Dale R. Morley, Paul S. Belk, Keith E. Appl Environ Microbiol Microbial Ecology Treatment of food-producing animals with antimicrobial drugs (AMD) is controversial because of concerns regarding promotion of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). To investigate this concern, resistance genes in metagenomic bovine fecal samples during a clinical trial were analyzed to assess the impacts of treatment on beef feedlot cattle resistomes. Four groups of cattle were exposed, using a 2-by-2 factorial design, to different regimens of antimicrobial treatment. Injections of ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (a third-generation cephalosporin) were used to treat all cattle in treatment pens or only a single animal, and either chlortetracycline was included in the feed of all cattle in a pen or the feed was untreated. On days 0 and 26, respectively, pre- and posttrial fecal samples were collected, and resistance genes were characterized using shotgun metagenomics. Treatment with ceftiofur was not associated with changes to β-lactam resistance genes. However, cattle fed chlortetracycline had a significant increase in relative abundance of tetracycline resistance genes. There was also an increase of an AMR class not administered during the study, which is a possible indicator of coselection of resistance genes. Samples analyzed in this study had previously been evaluated by culture characterization (Escherichia coli and Salmonella) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) of metagenomic fecal DNA, which allowed comparison of results with this study. In the majority of samples, genes that were selectively enriched through culture and qPCR were not identified through shotgun metagenomic sequencing in this study, suggesting that changes previously documented did not reflect changes affecting the majority of bacterial genetic elements found in the predominant fecal resistome. IMPORTANCE Despite significant concerns about public health implications of AMR in relation to use of AMD in food animals, there are many unknowns about the long- and short-term impact of common uses of AMD for treatment, control, and prevention of disease. Additionally, questions commonly arise regarding how to best measure and quantify AMR genes in relation to public health risks and how to determine which genes are most important. These data provide an introductory view of the utility of using shotgun metagenomic sequencing data as an outcome for clinical trials evaluating the impact of using AMD in food animals. American Society for Microbiology 2018-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6007121/ /pubmed/29728379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00610-18 Text en Copyright © 2018 Weinroth et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Microbial Ecology
Weinroth, Margaret D.
Scott, H. Morgan
Norby, Bo
Loneragan, Guy H.
Noyes, Noelle R.
Rovira, Pablo
Doster, Enrique
Yang, Xiang
Woerner, Dale R.
Morley, Paul S.
Belk, Keith E.
Effects of Ceftiofur and Chlortetracycline on the Resistomes of Feedlot Cattle
title Effects of Ceftiofur and Chlortetracycline on the Resistomes of Feedlot Cattle
title_full Effects of Ceftiofur and Chlortetracycline on the Resistomes of Feedlot Cattle
title_fullStr Effects of Ceftiofur and Chlortetracycline on the Resistomes of Feedlot Cattle
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Ceftiofur and Chlortetracycline on the Resistomes of Feedlot Cattle
title_short Effects of Ceftiofur and Chlortetracycline on the Resistomes of Feedlot Cattle
title_sort effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline on the resistomes of feedlot cattle
topic Microbial Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29728379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00610-18
work_keys_str_mv AT weinrothmargaretd effectsofceftiofurandchlortetracyclineontheresistomesoffeedlotcattle
AT scotthmorgan effectsofceftiofurandchlortetracyclineontheresistomesoffeedlotcattle
AT norbybo effectsofceftiofurandchlortetracyclineontheresistomesoffeedlotcattle
AT loneraganguyh effectsofceftiofurandchlortetracyclineontheresistomesoffeedlotcattle
AT noyesnoeller effectsofceftiofurandchlortetracyclineontheresistomesoffeedlotcattle
AT rovirapablo effectsofceftiofurandchlortetracyclineontheresistomesoffeedlotcattle
AT dosterenrique effectsofceftiofurandchlortetracyclineontheresistomesoffeedlotcattle
AT yangxiang effectsofceftiofurandchlortetracyclineontheresistomesoffeedlotcattle
AT woernerdaler effectsofceftiofurandchlortetracyclineontheresistomesoffeedlotcattle
AT morleypauls effectsofceftiofurandchlortetracyclineontheresistomesoffeedlotcattle
AT belkkeithe effectsofceftiofurandchlortetracyclineontheresistomesoffeedlotcattle