Cargando…
Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation
BACKGROUND: Inhaled medication is central to the treatment of COPD. Various types of inhaler devices, which directly deliver medication to the lung, have been developed. However, patients often exhibit incorrect techniques of inhaler usage. Effectiveness of therapy may be affected by the ease of dev...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942127 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S152285 |
_version_ | 1783332989035347968 |
---|---|
author | Man, Kwun Nok Mimi Tian, Zhipeng Lam, David Chi-Leung Wan, Jennifer Man Fan Tan-Un, Kian Cheng |
author_facet | Man, Kwun Nok Mimi Tian, Zhipeng Lam, David Chi-Leung Wan, Jennifer Man Fan Tan-Un, Kian Cheng |
author_sort | Man, Kwun Nok Mimi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inhaled medication is central to the treatment of COPD. Various types of inhaler devices, which directly deliver medication to the lung, have been developed. However, patients often exhibit incorrect techniques of inhaler usage. Effectiveness of therapy may be affected by the ease of device usage, size, convenience of use, durability, clarity of instructions and device preferences of patients. This study compares the satisfaction and preference, as well as error occurrence, with the use of Genuair(®), Ellipta™ and Breezhaler™ by healthy subjects in Hong Kong. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty healthy Hong Kong Chinese subjects aged ≥40 years without a previous diagnosis of COPD and asthma and with no experience of using dry powder inhalers (DPIs) were recruited. Subjects learned to use the three DPIs by initially reading the instructions and then observing a demonstration with verbal explanation. The number of errors committed was evaluated. Subjects also completed a questionnaire to indicate their satisfaction and preference. RESULTS: The satisfaction score of comfort for Breezhaler was significantly higher than that for Ellipta (p≤0.05), while the satisfaction score on confidence to have inhaled the entire dose was highest for Genuair compared with Ellipta (p≤0.0001) or Breezhaler (p≤0.05). The overall satisfaction score was significantly higher for Genuair than Ellipta (p≤0.05) or Breezhaler (p≤0.01). After reading the instructions, the highest number of subjects committing one or more critical errors was with Breezhaler (97) followed by Genuair (70) and then Ellipta (33). Demonstration reduced the number of critical errors made by subjects for each DPI to one third or lower. CONCLUSION: Breezhaler seemed to be more comfortable and easy to carry, but users made less critical errors when using Ellipta after reading the instructions only. Genuair provided the clearest indication of correct dose preparation and inhalation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6007194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60071942018-06-25 Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation Man, Kwun Nok Mimi Tian, Zhipeng Lam, David Chi-Leung Wan, Jennifer Man Fan Tan-Un, Kian Cheng Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Inhaled medication is central to the treatment of COPD. Various types of inhaler devices, which directly deliver medication to the lung, have been developed. However, patients often exhibit incorrect techniques of inhaler usage. Effectiveness of therapy may be affected by the ease of device usage, size, convenience of use, durability, clarity of instructions and device preferences of patients. This study compares the satisfaction and preference, as well as error occurrence, with the use of Genuair(®), Ellipta™ and Breezhaler™ by healthy subjects in Hong Kong. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty healthy Hong Kong Chinese subjects aged ≥40 years without a previous diagnosis of COPD and asthma and with no experience of using dry powder inhalers (DPIs) were recruited. Subjects learned to use the three DPIs by initially reading the instructions and then observing a demonstration with verbal explanation. The number of errors committed was evaluated. Subjects also completed a questionnaire to indicate their satisfaction and preference. RESULTS: The satisfaction score of comfort for Breezhaler was significantly higher than that for Ellipta (p≤0.05), while the satisfaction score on confidence to have inhaled the entire dose was highest for Genuair compared with Ellipta (p≤0.0001) or Breezhaler (p≤0.05). The overall satisfaction score was significantly higher for Genuair than Ellipta (p≤0.05) or Breezhaler (p≤0.01). After reading the instructions, the highest number of subjects committing one or more critical errors was with Breezhaler (97) followed by Genuair (70) and then Ellipta (33). Demonstration reduced the number of critical errors made by subjects for each DPI to one third or lower. CONCLUSION: Breezhaler seemed to be more comfortable and easy to carry, but users made less critical errors when using Ellipta after reading the instructions only. Genuair provided the clearest indication of correct dose preparation and inhalation. Dove Medical Press 2018-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6007194/ /pubmed/29942127 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S152285 Text en © 2018 Man et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Man, Kwun Nok Mimi Tian, Zhipeng Lam, David Chi-Leung Wan, Jennifer Man Fan Tan-Un, Kian Cheng Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation |
title | Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation |
title_full | Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation |
title_fullStr | Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation |
title_full_unstemmed | Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation |
title_short | Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation |
title_sort | satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942127 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S152285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mankwunnokmimi satisfactionpreferenceanderroroccurrenceofthreedrypowderinhalersasassessedbyacohortnaivetoinhaleroperation AT tianzhipeng satisfactionpreferenceanderroroccurrenceofthreedrypowderinhalersasassessedbyacohortnaivetoinhaleroperation AT lamdavidchileung satisfactionpreferenceanderroroccurrenceofthreedrypowderinhalersasassessedbyacohortnaivetoinhaleroperation AT wanjennifermanfan satisfactionpreferenceanderroroccurrenceofthreedrypowderinhalersasassessedbyacohortnaivetoinhaleroperation AT tanunkiancheng satisfactionpreferenceanderroroccurrenceofthreedrypowderinhalersasassessedbyacohortnaivetoinhaleroperation |