Cargando…

Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation

BACKGROUND: Inhaled medication is central to the treatment of COPD. Various types of inhaler devices, which directly deliver medication to the lung, have been developed. However, patients often exhibit incorrect techniques of inhaler usage. Effectiveness of therapy may be affected by the ease of dev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Man, Kwun Nok Mimi, Tian, Zhipeng, Lam, David Chi-Leung, Wan, Jennifer Man Fan, Tan-Un, Kian Cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942127
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S152285
_version_ 1783332989035347968
author Man, Kwun Nok Mimi
Tian, Zhipeng
Lam, David Chi-Leung
Wan, Jennifer Man Fan
Tan-Un, Kian Cheng
author_facet Man, Kwun Nok Mimi
Tian, Zhipeng
Lam, David Chi-Leung
Wan, Jennifer Man Fan
Tan-Un, Kian Cheng
author_sort Man, Kwun Nok Mimi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inhaled medication is central to the treatment of COPD. Various types of inhaler devices, which directly deliver medication to the lung, have been developed. However, patients often exhibit incorrect techniques of inhaler usage. Effectiveness of therapy may be affected by the ease of device usage, size, convenience of use, durability, clarity of instructions and device preferences of patients. This study compares the satisfaction and preference, as well as error occurrence, with the use of Genuair(®), Ellipta™ and Breezhaler™ by healthy subjects in Hong Kong. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty healthy Hong Kong Chinese subjects aged ≥40 years without a previous diagnosis of COPD and asthma and with no experience of using dry powder inhalers (DPIs) were recruited. Subjects learned to use the three DPIs by initially reading the instructions and then observing a demonstration with verbal explanation. The number of errors committed was evaluated. Subjects also completed a questionnaire to indicate their satisfaction and preference. RESULTS: The satisfaction score of comfort for Breezhaler was significantly higher than that for Ellipta (p≤0.05), while the satisfaction score on confidence to have inhaled the entire dose was highest for Genuair compared with Ellipta (p≤0.0001) or Breezhaler (p≤0.05). The overall satisfaction score was significantly higher for Genuair than Ellipta (p≤0.05) or Breezhaler (p≤0.01). After reading the instructions, the highest number of subjects committing one or more critical errors was with Breezhaler (97) followed by Genuair (70) and then Ellipta (33). Demonstration reduced the number of critical errors made by subjects for each DPI to one third or lower. CONCLUSION: Breezhaler seemed to be more comfortable and easy to carry, but users made less critical errors when using Ellipta after reading the instructions only. Genuair provided the clearest indication of correct dose preparation and inhalation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6007194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60071942018-06-25 Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation Man, Kwun Nok Mimi Tian, Zhipeng Lam, David Chi-Leung Wan, Jennifer Man Fan Tan-Un, Kian Cheng Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Inhaled medication is central to the treatment of COPD. Various types of inhaler devices, which directly deliver medication to the lung, have been developed. However, patients often exhibit incorrect techniques of inhaler usage. Effectiveness of therapy may be affected by the ease of device usage, size, convenience of use, durability, clarity of instructions and device preferences of patients. This study compares the satisfaction and preference, as well as error occurrence, with the use of Genuair(®), Ellipta™ and Breezhaler™ by healthy subjects in Hong Kong. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty healthy Hong Kong Chinese subjects aged ≥40 years without a previous diagnosis of COPD and asthma and with no experience of using dry powder inhalers (DPIs) were recruited. Subjects learned to use the three DPIs by initially reading the instructions and then observing a demonstration with verbal explanation. The number of errors committed was evaluated. Subjects also completed a questionnaire to indicate their satisfaction and preference. RESULTS: The satisfaction score of comfort for Breezhaler was significantly higher than that for Ellipta (p≤0.05), while the satisfaction score on confidence to have inhaled the entire dose was highest for Genuair compared with Ellipta (p≤0.0001) or Breezhaler (p≤0.05). The overall satisfaction score was significantly higher for Genuair than Ellipta (p≤0.05) or Breezhaler (p≤0.01). After reading the instructions, the highest number of subjects committing one or more critical errors was with Breezhaler (97) followed by Genuair (70) and then Ellipta (33). Demonstration reduced the number of critical errors made by subjects for each DPI to one third or lower. CONCLUSION: Breezhaler seemed to be more comfortable and easy to carry, but users made less critical errors when using Ellipta after reading the instructions only. Genuair provided the clearest indication of correct dose preparation and inhalation. Dove Medical Press 2018-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6007194/ /pubmed/29942127 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S152285 Text en © 2018 Man et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Man, Kwun Nok Mimi
Tian, Zhipeng
Lam, David Chi-Leung
Wan, Jennifer Man Fan
Tan-Un, Kian Cheng
Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation
title Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation
title_full Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation
title_fullStr Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation
title_full_unstemmed Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation
title_short Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation
title_sort satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942127
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S152285
work_keys_str_mv AT mankwunnokmimi satisfactionpreferenceanderroroccurrenceofthreedrypowderinhalersasassessedbyacohortnaivetoinhaleroperation
AT tianzhipeng satisfactionpreferenceanderroroccurrenceofthreedrypowderinhalersasassessedbyacohortnaivetoinhaleroperation
AT lamdavidchileung satisfactionpreferenceanderroroccurrenceofthreedrypowderinhalersasassessedbyacohortnaivetoinhaleroperation
AT wanjennifermanfan satisfactionpreferenceanderroroccurrenceofthreedrypowderinhalersasassessedbyacohortnaivetoinhaleroperation
AT tanunkiancheng satisfactionpreferenceanderroroccurrenceofthreedrypowderinhalersasassessedbyacohortnaivetoinhaleroperation