Cargando…
Engineering altered protein–DNA recognition specificity
Protein engineering is used to generate novel protein folds and assemblages, to impart new properties and functions onto existing proteins, and to enhance our understanding of principles that govern protein structure. While such approaches can be employed to reprogram protein–protein interactions, m...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29718463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky289 |
_version_ | 1783333004585730048 |
---|---|
author | Bogdanove, Adam J Bohm, Andrew Miller, Jeffrey C Morgan, Richard D Stoddard, Barry L |
author_facet | Bogdanove, Adam J Bohm, Andrew Miller, Jeffrey C Morgan, Richard D Stoddard, Barry L |
author_sort | Bogdanove, Adam J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Protein engineering is used to generate novel protein folds and assemblages, to impart new properties and functions onto existing proteins, and to enhance our understanding of principles that govern protein structure. While such approaches can be employed to reprogram protein–protein interactions, modifying protein–DNA interactions is more difficult. This may be related to the structural features of protein–DNA interfaces, which display more charged groups, directional hydrogen bonds, ordered solvent molecules and counterions than comparable protein interfaces. Nevertheless, progress has been made in the redesign of protein–DNA specificity, much of it driven by the development of engineered enzymes for genome modification. Here, we summarize the creation of novel DNA specificities for zinc finger proteins, meganucleases, TAL effectors, recombinases and restriction endonucleases. The ease of re-engineering each system is related both to the modularity of the protein and the extent to which the proteins have evolved to be capable of readily modifying their recognition specificities in response to natural selection. The development of engineered DNA binding proteins that display an ideal combination of activity, specificity, deliverability, and outcomes is not a fully solved problem, however each of the current platforms offers unique advantages, offset by behaviors and properties requiring further study and development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6007267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60072672018-06-25 Engineering altered protein–DNA recognition specificity Bogdanove, Adam J Bohm, Andrew Miller, Jeffrey C Morgan, Richard D Stoddard, Barry L Nucleic Acids Res Survey and Summary Protein engineering is used to generate novel protein folds and assemblages, to impart new properties and functions onto existing proteins, and to enhance our understanding of principles that govern protein structure. While such approaches can be employed to reprogram protein–protein interactions, modifying protein–DNA interactions is more difficult. This may be related to the structural features of protein–DNA interfaces, which display more charged groups, directional hydrogen bonds, ordered solvent molecules and counterions than comparable protein interfaces. Nevertheless, progress has been made in the redesign of protein–DNA specificity, much of it driven by the development of engineered enzymes for genome modification. Here, we summarize the creation of novel DNA specificities for zinc finger proteins, meganucleases, TAL effectors, recombinases and restriction endonucleases. The ease of re-engineering each system is related both to the modularity of the protein and the extent to which the proteins have evolved to be capable of readily modifying their recognition specificities in response to natural selection. The development of engineered DNA binding proteins that display an ideal combination of activity, specificity, deliverability, and outcomes is not a fully solved problem, however each of the current platforms offers unique advantages, offset by behaviors and properties requiring further study and development. Oxford University Press 2018-06-01 2018-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6007267/ /pubmed/29718463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky289 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Survey and Summary Bogdanove, Adam J Bohm, Andrew Miller, Jeffrey C Morgan, Richard D Stoddard, Barry L Engineering altered protein–DNA recognition specificity |
title | Engineering altered protein–DNA recognition specificity |
title_full | Engineering altered protein–DNA recognition specificity |
title_fullStr | Engineering altered protein–DNA recognition specificity |
title_full_unstemmed | Engineering altered protein–DNA recognition specificity |
title_short | Engineering altered protein–DNA recognition specificity |
title_sort | engineering altered protein–dna recognition specificity |
topic | Survey and Summary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29718463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bogdanoveadamj engineeringalteredproteindnarecognitionspecificity AT bohmandrew engineeringalteredproteindnarecognitionspecificity AT millerjeffreyc engineeringalteredproteindnarecognitionspecificity AT morganrichardd engineeringalteredproteindnarecognitionspecificity AT stoddardbarryl engineeringalteredproteindnarecognitionspecificity |