Cargando…
Shock-wave lithotripsy or ureterorenoscopy for renal stones?
Kidney stones are a common condition with high direct and indirect costs; to date, the optimal urological approach for some particular presentations including non-lower pole kidney stones between 10 and 20 mm of diameter is not clear. A limited number of randomized controlled trials and observationa...
Autores principales: | Ferraro, Pietro Manuel, Pinto, Francesco, Gambaro, Giovanni |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfy025 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of untreated renal calculi
por: Fankhauser, Christian D, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Is there a place for ESWL in the treatment of complicated proximal ureteral stones?
por: Bres–Niewada, Ewa
Publicado: (2013) -
Large impacted distal ureteric stones are treated better by URS: putting priorities
por: Malkhasyan, Vigen, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Getting access in PNL – eyes wide shut
por: Dybowski, Bartosz
Publicado: (2014) -
Comparison of the effectiveness of crushing concrements in the urinary tract with the use of holmium laser and sonotrode
por: Jakóbczyk, Barłtomiej, et al.
Publicado: (2011)