Cargando…

The conservation physiology toolbox: status and opportunities

For over a century, physiological tools and techniques have been allowing researchers to characterize how organisms respond to changes in their natural environment and how they interact with human activities or infrastructure. Over time, many of these techniques have become part of the conservation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madliger, Christine L, Love, Oliver P, Hultine, Kevin R, Cooke, Steven J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coy029
_version_ 1783333072210493440
author Madliger, Christine L
Love, Oliver P
Hultine, Kevin R
Cooke, Steven J
author_facet Madliger, Christine L
Love, Oliver P
Hultine, Kevin R
Cooke, Steven J
author_sort Madliger, Christine L
collection PubMed
description For over a century, physiological tools and techniques have been allowing researchers to characterize how organisms respond to changes in their natural environment and how they interact with human activities or infrastructure. Over time, many of these techniques have become part of the conservation physiology toolbox, which is used to monitor, predict, conserve, and restore plant and animal populations under threat. Here, we provide a summary of the tools that currently comprise the conservation physiology toolbox. By assessing patterns in articles that have been published in ‘Conservation Physiology’ over the past 5 years that focus on introducing, refining and validating tools, we provide an overview of where researchers are placing emphasis in terms of taxa and physiological sub-disciplines. Although there is certainly diversity across the toolbox, metrics of stress physiology (particularly glucocorticoids) and studies focusing on mammals have garnered the greatest attention, with both comprising the majority of publications (>45%). We also summarize the types of validations that are actively being completed, including those related to logistics (sample collection, storage and processing), interpretation of variation in physiological traits and relevance for conservation science. Finally, we provide recommendations for future tool refinement, with suggestions for: (i) improving our understanding of the applicability of glucocorticoid physiology; (ii) linking multiple physiological and non-physiological tools; (iii) establishing a framework for plant conservation physiology; (iv) assessing links between environmental disturbance, physiology and fitness; (v) appreciating opportunities for validations in under-represented taxa; and (vi) emphasizing tool validation as a core component of research programmes. Overall, we are confident that conservation physiology will continue to increase its applicability to more taxa, develop more non-invasive techniques, delineate where limitations exist, and identify the contexts necessary for interpretation in captivity and the wild.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6007632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60076322018-06-25 The conservation physiology toolbox: status and opportunities Madliger, Christine L Love, Oliver P Hultine, Kevin R Cooke, Steven J Conserv Physiol Perspective For over a century, physiological tools and techniques have been allowing researchers to characterize how organisms respond to changes in their natural environment and how they interact with human activities or infrastructure. Over time, many of these techniques have become part of the conservation physiology toolbox, which is used to monitor, predict, conserve, and restore plant and animal populations under threat. Here, we provide a summary of the tools that currently comprise the conservation physiology toolbox. By assessing patterns in articles that have been published in ‘Conservation Physiology’ over the past 5 years that focus on introducing, refining and validating tools, we provide an overview of where researchers are placing emphasis in terms of taxa and physiological sub-disciplines. Although there is certainly diversity across the toolbox, metrics of stress physiology (particularly glucocorticoids) and studies focusing on mammals have garnered the greatest attention, with both comprising the majority of publications (>45%). We also summarize the types of validations that are actively being completed, including those related to logistics (sample collection, storage and processing), interpretation of variation in physiological traits and relevance for conservation science. Finally, we provide recommendations for future tool refinement, with suggestions for: (i) improving our understanding of the applicability of glucocorticoid physiology; (ii) linking multiple physiological and non-physiological tools; (iii) establishing a framework for plant conservation physiology; (iv) assessing links between environmental disturbance, physiology and fitness; (v) appreciating opportunities for validations in under-represented taxa; and (vi) emphasizing tool validation as a core component of research programmes. Overall, we are confident that conservation physiology will continue to increase its applicability to more taxa, develop more non-invasive techniques, delineate where limitations exist, and identify the contexts necessary for interpretation in captivity and the wild. Oxford University Press 2018-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6007632/ /pubmed/29942517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coy029 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Perspective
Madliger, Christine L
Love, Oliver P
Hultine, Kevin R
Cooke, Steven J
The conservation physiology toolbox: status and opportunities
title The conservation physiology toolbox: status and opportunities
title_full The conservation physiology toolbox: status and opportunities
title_fullStr The conservation physiology toolbox: status and opportunities
title_full_unstemmed The conservation physiology toolbox: status and opportunities
title_short The conservation physiology toolbox: status and opportunities
title_sort conservation physiology toolbox: status and opportunities
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coy029
work_keys_str_mv AT madligerchristinel theconservationphysiologytoolboxstatusandopportunities
AT loveoliverp theconservationphysiologytoolboxstatusandopportunities
AT hultinekevinr theconservationphysiologytoolboxstatusandopportunities
AT cookestevenj theconservationphysiologytoolboxstatusandopportunities
AT madligerchristinel conservationphysiologytoolboxstatusandopportunities
AT loveoliverp conservationphysiologytoolboxstatusandopportunities
AT hultinekevinr conservationphysiologytoolboxstatusandopportunities
AT cookestevenj conservationphysiologytoolboxstatusandopportunities