Cargando…
Is progression of coronary artery calcification influenced by modality of renal replacement therapy? A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Progression of coronary artery calcification is an important marker for cardiovascular morbidity in end-stage renal disease patients. Therefore, we reviewed the evidence on coronary artery calcification progression in different renal replacement therapies. METHODS: MEDLINE (PubMed), Emba...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfx124 |
_version_ | 1783333096565768192 |
---|---|
author | Jansz, Thijs T Verhaar, Marianne C London, Gérard M van Jaarsveld, Brigit C |
author_facet | Jansz, Thijs T Verhaar, Marianne C London, Gérard M van Jaarsveld, Brigit C |
author_sort | Jansz, Thijs T |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Progression of coronary artery calcification is an important marker for cardiovascular morbidity in end-stage renal disease patients. Therefore, we reviewed the evidence on coronary artery calcification progression in different renal replacement therapies. METHODS: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and TRIP databases were searched from 1999 – 2016. Additionally, bibliographies were searched by hand and citation tracking of key publications was performed. Prospective studies were included that examined coronary artery calcification with two or more multislice computed tomography scans ≥6 months apart in patients 18–75 years old receiving any renal replacement therapy, including kidney transplantation. Reporting of separate scores for different modalities was required. Two researchers extracted data independently with pilot-tested forms and assessed the risk of bias using a validated tool. RESULTS: We identified 29 eligible studies that assessed coronary artery calcification progression in end-stage renal disease patients, of which 19 studies evaluated haemodialysis and 8 kidney transplantation. Evidence on progression in peritoneal dialysis (three studies) and nocturnal haemodialysis (one study) was limited. Meta-analysis was not possible due to diverse reporting methods of coronary artery calcification scores and definitions of progression. Median coronary artery calcification scores were considerably higher in haemodialysis cohorts at baseline, presumably due to a generally higher age and dialysis vintage. Median coronary artery calcification progressed universally. Visual inspection suggested the least progression in kidney transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to compare the influence of renal replacement therapies on coronary artery calcification progression. We advocate the adoption of a standardized reporting method of coronary artery calcification progression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6007793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60077932018-06-25 Is progression of coronary artery calcification influenced by modality of renal replacement therapy? A systematic review Jansz, Thijs T Verhaar, Marianne C London, Gérard M van Jaarsveld, Brigit C Clin Kidney J CKD-Mbd BACKGROUND: Progression of coronary artery calcification is an important marker for cardiovascular morbidity in end-stage renal disease patients. Therefore, we reviewed the evidence on coronary artery calcification progression in different renal replacement therapies. METHODS: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and TRIP databases were searched from 1999 – 2016. Additionally, bibliographies were searched by hand and citation tracking of key publications was performed. Prospective studies were included that examined coronary artery calcification with two or more multislice computed tomography scans ≥6 months apart in patients 18–75 years old receiving any renal replacement therapy, including kidney transplantation. Reporting of separate scores for different modalities was required. Two researchers extracted data independently with pilot-tested forms and assessed the risk of bias using a validated tool. RESULTS: We identified 29 eligible studies that assessed coronary artery calcification progression in end-stage renal disease patients, of which 19 studies evaluated haemodialysis and 8 kidney transplantation. Evidence on progression in peritoneal dialysis (three studies) and nocturnal haemodialysis (one study) was limited. Meta-analysis was not possible due to diverse reporting methods of coronary artery calcification scores and definitions of progression. Median coronary artery calcification scores were considerably higher in haemodialysis cohorts at baseline, presumably due to a generally higher age and dialysis vintage. Median coronary artery calcification progressed universally. Visual inspection suggested the least progression in kidney transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to compare the influence of renal replacement therapies on coronary artery calcification progression. We advocate the adoption of a standardized reporting method of coronary artery calcification progression. Oxford University Press 2018-06 2017-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6007793/ /pubmed/29942499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfx124 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | CKD-Mbd Jansz, Thijs T Verhaar, Marianne C London, Gérard M van Jaarsveld, Brigit C Is progression of coronary artery calcification influenced by modality of renal replacement therapy? A systematic review |
title | Is progression of coronary artery calcification influenced by modality of renal replacement therapy? A systematic review |
title_full | Is progression of coronary artery calcification influenced by modality of renal replacement therapy? A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Is progression of coronary artery calcification influenced by modality of renal replacement therapy? A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Is progression of coronary artery calcification influenced by modality of renal replacement therapy? A systematic review |
title_short | Is progression of coronary artery calcification influenced by modality of renal replacement therapy? A systematic review |
title_sort | is progression of coronary artery calcification influenced by modality of renal replacement therapy? a systematic review |
topic | CKD-Mbd |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfx124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janszthijst isprogressionofcoronaryarterycalcificationinfluencedbymodalityofrenalreplacementtherapyasystematicreview AT verhaarmariannec isprogressionofcoronaryarterycalcificationinfluencedbymodalityofrenalreplacementtherapyasystematicreview AT londongerardm isprogressionofcoronaryarterycalcificationinfluencedbymodalityofrenalreplacementtherapyasystematicreview AT vanjaarsveldbrigitc isprogressionofcoronaryarterycalcificationinfluencedbymodalityofrenalreplacementtherapyasystematicreview |