Cargando…
Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods
Severe peripheral nerve injuries are reconstructed either with autologous nerve grafts (gold standard) or alternatively with clinically approved artificial nerve guides. The most common method used to sterilize these medical products is ethylene oxide gassing (EO). However, this method has several d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6008694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29967779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6982738 |
_version_ | 1783333231464022016 |
---|---|
author | Stößel, Maria Metzen, Jennifer Wildhagen, Vivien M. Helmecke, Olaf Rehra, Lena Freier, Thomas Haastert-Talini, Kirsten |
author_facet | Stößel, Maria Metzen, Jennifer Wildhagen, Vivien M. Helmecke, Olaf Rehra, Lena Freier, Thomas Haastert-Talini, Kirsten |
author_sort | Stößel, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Severe peripheral nerve injuries are reconstructed either with autologous nerve grafts (gold standard) or alternatively with clinically approved artificial nerve guides. The most common method used to sterilize these medical products is ethylene oxide gassing (EO). However, this method has several disadvantages. An alternative, which has been barely studied so far, represents beta irradiation (β). In previous studies, we developed an artificial nerve guide made of chitosan (chitosan nerve guide, CNG), a biomaterial that is known to potentially retain toxic residues upon EO sterilization. Therefore, we analyzed the long-term regeneration-supporting and mechanical properties of CNGs upon their sterilization with EO or β and their following application in unilateral repair of 12 mm gaps of the rat sciatic nerve. Over a period of 76 weeks, we serially evaluated the recovery of motor functions, the possible emergence of an inflammation in the surrounding connective tissue, the regrowth of axons into the distal nerve, and possible changes in the material properties. Our first long-term evaluation did not reveal significant differences between both sterilization methods. Thus, β is as appropriate as commonly used EO for sterilization of CNGs; however, it may slightly increase the stiffness of the biomaterial over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6008694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60086942018-07-02 Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods Stößel, Maria Metzen, Jennifer Wildhagen, Vivien M. Helmecke, Olaf Rehra, Lena Freier, Thomas Haastert-Talini, Kirsten Biomed Res Int Research Article Severe peripheral nerve injuries are reconstructed either with autologous nerve grafts (gold standard) or alternatively with clinically approved artificial nerve guides. The most common method used to sterilize these medical products is ethylene oxide gassing (EO). However, this method has several disadvantages. An alternative, which has been barely studied so far, represents beta irradiation (β). In previous studies, we developed an artificial nerve guide made of chitosan (chitosan nerve guide, CNG), a biomaterial that is known to potentially retain toxic residues upon EO sterilization. Therefore, we analyzed the long-term regeneration-supporting and mechanical properties of CNGs upon their sterilization with EO or β and their following application in unilateral repair of 12 mm gaps of the rat sciatic nerve. Over a period of 76 weeks, we serially evaluated the recovery of motor functions, the possible emergence of an inflammation in the surrounding connective tissue, the regrowth of axons into the distal nerve, and possible changes in the material properties. Our first long-term evaluation did not reveal significant differences between both sterilization methods. Thus, β is as appropriate as commonly used EO for sterilization of CNGs; however, it may slightly increase the stiffness of the biomaterial over time. Hindawi 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6008694/ /pubmed/29967779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6982738 Text en Copyright © 2018 Maria Stößel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stößel, Maria Metzen, Jennifer Wildhagen, Vivien M. Helmecke, Olaf Rehra, Lena Freier, Thomas Haastert-Talini, Kirsten Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods |
title | Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods |
title_full | Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods |
title_fullStr | Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods |
title_short | Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods |
title_sort | long-term in vivo evaluation of chitosan nerve guide properties with respect to two different sterilization methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6008694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29967779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6982738 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stoßelmaria longterminvivoevaluationofchitosannerveguidepropertieswithrespecttotwodifferentsterilizationmethods AT metzenjennifer longterminvivoevaluationofchitosannerveguidepropertieswithrespecttotwodifferentsterilizationmethods AT wildhagenvivienm longterminvivoevaluationofchitosannerveguidepropertieswithrespecttotwodifferentsterilizationmethods AT helmeckeolaf longterminvivoevaluationofchitosannerveguidepropertieswithrespecttotwodifferentsterilizationmethods AT rehralena longterminvivoevaluationofchitosannerveguidepropertieswithrespecttotwodifferentsterilizationmethods AT freierthomas longterminvivoevaluationofchitosannerveguidepropertieswithrespecttotwodifferentsterilizationmethods AT haasterttalinikirsten longterminvivoevaluationofchitosannerveguidepropertieswithrespecttotwodifferentsterilizationmethods |