Cargando…

Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods

Severe peripheral nerve injuries are reconstructed either with autologous nerve grafts (gold standard) or alternatively with clinically approved artificial nerve guides. The most common method used to sterilize these medical products is ethylene oxide gassing (EO). However, this method has several d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stößel, Maria, Metzen, Jennifer, Wildhagen, Vivien M., Helmecke, Olaf, Rehra, Lena, Freier, Thomas, Haastert-Talini, Kirsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6008694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29967779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6982738
_version_ 1783333231464022016
author Stößel, Maria
Metzen, Jennifer
Wildhagen, Vivien M.
Helmecke, Olaf
Rehra, Lena
Freier, Thomas
Haastert-Talini, Kirsten
author_facet Stößel, Maria
Metzen, Jennifer
Wildhagen, Vivien M.
Helmecke, Olaf
Rehra, Lena
Freier, Thomas
Haastert-Talini, Kirsten
author_sort Stößel, Maria
collection PubMed
description Severe peripheral nerve injuries are reconstructed either with autologous nerve grafts (gold standard) or alternatively with clinically approved artificial nerve guides. The most common method used to sterilize these medical products is ethylene oxide gassing (EO). However, this method has several disadvantages. An alternative, which has been barely studied so far, represents beta irradiation (β). In previous studies, we developed an artificial nerve guide made of chitosan (chitosan nerve guide, CNG), a biomaterial that is known to potentially retain toxic residues upon EO sterilization. Therefore, we analyzed the long-term regeneration-supporting and mechanical properties of CNGs upon their sterilization with EO or β and their following application in unilateral repair of 12 mm gaps of the rat sciatic nerve. Over a period of 76 weeks, we serially evaluated the recovery of motor functions, the possible emergence of an inflammation in the surrounding connective tissue, the regrowth of axons into the distal nerve, and possible changes in the material properties. Our first long-term evaluation did not reveal significant differences between both sterilization methods. Thus, β is as appropriate as commonly used EO for sterilization of CNGs; however, it may slightly increase the stiffness of the biomaterial over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6008694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60086942018-07-02 Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods Stößel, Maria Metzen, Jennifer Wildhagen, Vivien M. Helmecke, Olaf Rehra, Lena Freier, Thomas Haastert-Talini, Kirsten Biomed Res Int Research Article Severe peripheral nerve injuries are reconstructed either with autologous nerve grafts (gold standard) or alternatively with clinically approved artificial nerve guides. The most common method used to sterilize these medical products is ethylene oxide gassing (EO). However, this method has several disadvantages. An alternative, which has been barely studied so far, represents beta irradiation (β). In previous studies, we developed an artificial nerve guide made of chitosan (chitosan nerve guide, CNG), a biomaterial that is known to potentially retain toxic residues upon EO sterilization. Therefore, we analyzed the long-term regeneration-supporting and mechanical properties of CNGs upon their sterilization with EO or β and their following application in unilateral repair of 12 mm gaps of the rat sciatic nerve. Over a period of 76 weeks, we serially evaluated the recovery of motor functions, the possible emergence of an inflammation in the surrounding connective tissue, the regrowth of axons into the distal nerve, and possible changes in the material properties. Our first long-term evaluation did not reveal significant differences between both sterilization methods. Thus, β is as appropriate as commonly used EO for sterilization of CNGs; however, it may slightly increase the stiffness of the biomaterial over time. Hindawi 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6008694/ /pubmed/29967779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6982738 Text en Copyright © 2018 Maria Stößel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stößel, Maria
Metzen, Jennifer
Wildhagen, Vivien M.
Helmecke, Olaf
Rehra, Lena
Freier, Thomas
Haastert-Talini, Kirsten
Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods
title Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods
title_full Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods
title_fullStr Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods
title_short Long-Term In Vivo Evaluation of Chitosan Nerve Guide Properties with respect to Two Different Sterilization Methods
title_sort long-term in vivo evaluation of chitosan nerve guide properties with respect to two different sterilization methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6008694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29967779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6982738
work_keys_str_mv AT stoßelmaria longterminvivoevaluationofchitosannerveguidepropertieswithrespecttotwodifferentsterilizationmethods
AT metzenjennifer longterminvivoevaluationofchitosannerveguidepropertieswithrespecttotwodifferentsterilizationmethods
AT wildhagenvivienm longterminvivoevaluationofchitosannerveguidepropertieswithrespecttotwodifferentsterilizationmethods
AT helmeckeolaf longterminvivoevaluationofchitosannerveguidepropertieswithrespecttotwodifferentsterilizationmethods
AT rehralena longterminvivoevaluationofchitosannerveguidepropertieswithrespecttotwodifferentsterilizationmethods
AT freierthomas longterminvivoevaluationofchitosannerveguidepropertieswithrespecttotwodifferentsterilizationmethods
AT haasterttalinikirsten longterminvivoevaluationofchitosannerveguidepropertieswithrespecttotwodifferentsterilizationmethods