Cargando…

Estimation of the Craniectomy Surface Area by Using Postoperative Images

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a neurosurgical procedure performed to relieve the intracranial pressure engendered by brain swelling. However, no easy and accurate method exists for determining the craniectomy surface area. In this study, we implemented and compared three methods of estimating th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Meng-Yin, Tseng, Wei-Lung, Xiao, Furen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6008696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5237693
_version_ 1783333231970484224
author Ho, Meng-Yin
Tseng, Wei-Lung
Xiao, Furen
author_facet Ho, Meng-Yin
Tseng, Wei-Lung
Xiao, Furen
author_sort Ho, Meng-Yin
collection PubMed
description Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a neurosurgical procedure performed to relieve the intracranial pressure engendered by brain swelling. However, no easy and accurate method exists for determining the craniectomy surface area. In this study, we implemented and compared three methods of estimating the craniectomy surface area for evaluating the decompressive effort. We collected 118 sets of preoperative and postoperative brain computed tomography images from patients who underwent craniectomy procedures between April 2009 and April 2011. The surface area associated with each craniectomy was estimated using the marching cube and quasi-Monte Carlo methods. The surface area was also estimated using a simple AC method, in which the area is calculated by multiplying the craniectomy length (A) by its height (C). The estimated surface area ranged from 9.46 to 205.32 cm(2), with a median of 134.80 cm(2). The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) between the marching cube and quasi-Monte Carlo methods was 7.53 cm(2). Furthermore, the RMSD was 14.45 cm(2) between the marching cube and AC methods and 12.70 cm(2) between the quasi-Monte Carlo and AC methods. Paired t-tests indicated no statistically significant difference between these methods. The marching cube and quasi-Monte Carlo methods yield similar results. The results calculated using the AC method are also clinically acceptable for estimating the DC surface area. Our results can facilitate additional studies on the association of decompressive effort with the effect of craniectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6008696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60086962018-07-03 Estimation of the Craniectomy Surface Area by Using Postoperative Images Ho, Meng-Yin Tseng, Wei-Lung Xiao, Furen Int J Biomed Imaging Research Article Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a neurosurgical procedure performed to relieve the intracranial pressure engendered by brain swelling. However, no easy and accurate method exists for determining the craniectomy surface area. In this study, we implemented and compared three methods of estimating the craniectomy surface area for evaluating the decompressive effort. We collected 118 sets of preoperative and postoperative brain computed tomography images from patients who underwent craniectomy procedures between April 2009 and April 2011. The surface area associated with each craniectomy was estimated using the marching cube and quasi-Monte Carlo methods. The surface area was also estimated using a simple AC method, in which the area is calculated by multiplying the craniectomy length (A) by its height (C). The estimated surface area ranged from 9.46 to 205.32 cm(2), with a median of 134.80 cm(2). The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) between the marching cube and quasi-Monte Carlo methods was 7.53 cm(2). Furthermore, the RMSD was 14.45 cm(2) between the marching cube and AC methods and 12.70 cm(2) between the quasi-Monte Carlo and AC methods. Paired t-tests indicated no statistically significant difference between these methods. The marching cube and quasi-Monte Carlo methods yield similar results. The results calculated using the AC method are also clinically acceptable for estimating the DC surface area. Our results can facilitate additional studies on the association of decompressive effort with the effect of craniectomy. Hindawi 2018-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6008696/ /pubmed/29971096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5237693 Text en Copyright © 2018 Meng-Yin Ho et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ho, Meng-Yin
Tseng, Wei-Lung
Xiao, Furen
Estimation of the Craniectomy Surface Area by Using Postoperative Images
title Estimation of the Craniectomy Surface Area by Using Postoperative Images
title_full Estimation of the Craniectomy Surface Area by Using Postoperative Images
title_fullStr Estimation of the Craniectomy Surface Area by Using Postoperative Images
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of the Craniectomy Surface Area by Using Postoperative Images
title_short Estimation of the Craniectomy Surface Area by Using Postoperative Images
title_sort estimation of the craniectomy surface area by using postoperative images
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6008696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5237693
work_keys_str_mv AT homengyin estimationofthecraniectomysurfaceareabyusingpostoperativeimages
AT tsengweilung estimationofthecraniectomysurfaceareabyusingpostoperativeimages
AT xiaofuren estimationofthecraniectomysurfaceareabyusingpostoperativeimages