Cargando…
Significance of intra-operative blood pressure data resolution: A retrospective, observational study
Background: With evolving techniques for analysis of blood pressure (BP) variability, the importance of sampling resolution for intra-operative BP still remains to be examined. This study aims at comparing BP data with beat-by-beat vs. 15 second resolution. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6008844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29946438 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13810.1 |
_version_ | 1783333262925496320 |
---|---|
author | Packiasabapathy, Senthil Susheela, Ammu T. Mujica, Fernando Subramaniam, Balachundhar |
author_facet | Packiasabapathy, Senthil Susheela, Ammu T. Mujica, Fernando Subramaniam, Balachundhar |
author_sort | Packiasabapathy, Senthil |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: With evolving techniques for analysis of blood pressure (BP) variability, the importance of sampling resolution for intra-operative BP still remains to be examined. This study aims at comparing BP data with beat-by-beat vs. 15 second resolution. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of intra-arterial BP data obtained from cardiac surgical patients from the intra-operative period. Data was collected from two sources for each patient, one with beat-by-beat frequency, other at a frequency of once every 15 seconds. The fraction of time and area under the curve beyond systolic BP thresholds of 95 – 135 mmHg were calculated using data from both sources, for each patient. These were compared using Wilcoxon ranked sum test for paired samples using R-statistics version 3.4.3. Results: There was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) between the parameters from the two sources. This was especially true for parameters below and outside the thresholds. Only time fraction showed significant difference above the 135 mmHg threshold. Conclusion: Our preliminary analysis shows a definitive difference between BP descriptors, depending on sampling resolution. But the impact of this difference on the outcome predicting models of the parameters stands to be ascertained. Future larger studies, powered to examine the impact of sampling resolution on outcome predictive ability of BP descriptors, with special emphasis on dynamic markers of complexity are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6008844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60088442018-06-25 Significance of intra-operative blood pressure data resolution: A retrospective, observational study Packiasabapathy, Senthil Susheela, Ammu T. Mujica, Fernando Subramaniam, Balachundhar F1000Res Research Article Background: With evolving techniques for analysis of blood pressure (BP) variability, the importance of sampling resolution for intra-operative BP still remains to be examined. This study aims at comparing BP data with beat-by-beat vs. 15 second resolution. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of intra-arterial BP data obtained from cardiac surgical patients from the intra-operative period. Data was collected from two sources for each patient, one with beat-by-beat frequency, other at a frequency of once every 15 seconds. The fraction of time and area under the curve beyond systolic BP thresholds of 95 – 135 mmHg were calculated using data from both sources, for each patient. These were compared using Wilcoxon ranked sum test for paired samples using R-statistics version 3.4.3. Results: There was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) between the parameters from the two sources. This was especially true for parameters below and outside the thresholds. Only time fraction showed significant difference above the 135 mmHg threshold. Conclusion: Our preliminary analysis shows a definitive difference between BP descriptors, depending on sampling resolution. But the impact of this difference on the outcome predicting models of the parameters stands to be ascertained. Future larger studies, powered to examine the impact of sampling resolution on outcome predictive ability of BP descriptors, with special emphasis on dynamic markers of complexity are warranted. F1000 Research Limited 2018-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6008844/ /pubmed/29946438 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13810.1 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Packiasabapathy S et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Packiasabapathy, Senthil Susheela, Ammu T. Mujica, Fernando Subramaniam, Balachundhar Significance of intra-operative blood pressure data resolution: A retrospective, observational study |
title | Significance of intra-operative blood pressure data resolution: A retrospective, observational study |
title_full | Significance of intra-operative blood pressure data resolution: A retrospective, observational study |
title_fullStr | Significance of intra-operative blood pressure data resolution: A retrospective, observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Significance of intra-operative blood pressure data resolution: A retrospective, observational study |
title_short | Significance of intra-operative blood pressure data resolution: A retrospective, observational study |
title_sort | significance of intra-operative blood pressure data resolution: a retrospective, observational study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6008844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29946438 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13810.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT packiasabapathysenthil significanceofintraoperativebloodpressuredataresolutionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT susheelaammut significanceofintraoperativebloodpressuredataresolutionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT mujicafernando significanceofintraoperativebloodpressuredataresolutionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT subramaniambalachundhar significanceofintraoperativebloodpressuredataresolutionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy |