Cargando…

Availability and affordability of biologic versus non-biologic anticancer medicines: a cross-sectional study in Punjab, Pakistan

OBJECTIVES: Prime focus of this study was to evaluate the availability and affordability of originator brands (OBs) and lowest price generics (LPGs) of prescribed biologic and non-biologic anticancer medicines. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: A descriptive, cross-sectional survey was conducted in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saqib, Anum, Iftikhar, Sadia, Sarwar, Muhammad Rehan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29903783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019015
_version_ 1783333393044340736
author Saqib, Anum
Iftikhar, Sadia
Sarwar, Muhammad Rehan
author_facet Saqib, Anum
Iftikhar, Sadia
Sarwar, Muhammad Rehan
author_sort Saqib, Anum
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Prime focus of this study was to evaluate the availability and affordability of originator brands (OBs) and lowest price generics (LPGs) of prescribed biologic and non-biologic anticancer medicines. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: A descriptive, cross-sectional survey was conducted in 22 cancer-care hospitals (18 public hospitals and 4 private hospitals) and 44 private pharmacies in Punjab, Pakistan. Sampling population consisted of 4483 patients with cancer aged ≥18 years. The availability was determined by classifying anticancer medicines in four categories: absent/unavailability (medicines not present in any surveyed facility), low availability (medicines present in <50% of surveyed facilities), fairly high availability (medicines present in 50%–74% of surveyed facilities) and high availability (medicines present in >75% of surveyed facilities). Medicines were affordable if overall cost of all the prescribed anticancer medicines were 20% of the household capacity to pay. Data were analysed by using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, V.21.0). RESULTS: A total of 5060 patients with cancer were approached out of which 4483 patients were included in the survey. Overall, 10 103 anticancer drugs were prescribed. Among them, 96.3% were non-biologics and 3.7% were biologics. Oncologists were reluctant to prescribe biologics due to high prices. 58.1% of non-biologics were affordable; whereas, the affordability of biologics was 3.3%. A total of 43.9% of both biologic and non-biologic OBs were available; whereas, their affordability was 44.2%. On the other hand, the availability of LPGs was 21.3%, and their affordability was 66.1%. For low-income patients, the affordability of non-biologics was 31.6% and the affordability of biologics was 1.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the patients with cancer were prescribed non-biologics due to their low price and better affordability. In contrast to OBs, LPGs of both biologics and non-biologics had less availability but more affordability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6009472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60094722018-06-25 Availability and affordability of biologic versus non-biologic anticancer medicines: a cross-sectional study in Punjab, Pakistan Saqib, Anum Iftikhar, Sadia Sarwar, Muhammad Rehan BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVES: Prime focus of this study was to evaluate the availability and affordability of originator brands (OBs) and lowest price generics (LPGs) of prescribed biologic and non-biologic anticancer medicines. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: A descriptive, cross-sectional survey was conducted in 22 cancer-care hospitals (18 public hospitals and 4 private hospitals) and 44 private pharmacies in Punjab, Pakistan. Sampling population consisted of 4483 patients with cancer aged ≥18 years. The availability was determined by classifying anticancer medicines in four categories: absent/unavailability (medicines not present in any surveyed facility), low availability (medicines present in <50% of surveyed facilities), fairly high availability (medicines present in 50%–74% of surveyed facilities) and high availability (medicines present in >75% of surveyed facilities). Medicines were affordable if overall cost of all the prescribed anticancer medicines were 20% of the household capacity to pay. Data were analysed by using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, V.21.0). RESULTS: A total of 5060 patients with cancer were approached out of which 4483 patients were included in the survey. Overall, 10 103 anticancer drugs were prescribed. Among them, 96.3% were non-biologics and 3.7% were biologics. Oncologists were reluctant to prescribe biologics due to high prices. 58.1% of non-biologics were affordable; whereas, the affordability of biologics was 3.3%. A total of 43.9% of both biologic and non-biologic OBs were available; whereas, their affordability was 44.2%. On the other hand, the availability of LPGs was 21.3%, and their affordability was 66.1%. For low-income patients, the affordability of non-biologics was 31.6% and the affordability of biologics was 1.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the patients with cancer were prescribed non-biologics due to their low price and better affordability. In contrast to OBs, LPGs of both biologics and non-biologics had less availability but more affordability. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6009472/ /pubmed/29903783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019015 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Oncology
Saqib, Anum
Iftikhar, Sadia
Sarwar, Muhammad Rehan
Availability and affordability of biologic versus non-biologic anticancer medicines: a cross-sectional study in Punjab, Pakistan
title Availability and affordability of biologic versus non-biologic anticancer medicines: a cross-sectional study in Punjab, Pakistan
title_full Availability and affordability of biologic versus non-biologic anticancer medicines: a cross-sectional study in Punjab, Pakistan
title_fullStr Availability and affordability of biologic versus non-biologic anticancer medicines: a cross-sectional study in Punjab, Pakistan
title_full_unstemmed Availability and affordability of biologic versus non-biologic anticancer medicines: a cross-sectional study in Punjab, Pakistan
title_short Availability and affordability of biologic versus non-biologic anticancer medicines: a cross-sectional study in Punjab, Pakistan
title_sort availability and affordability of biologic versus non-biologic anticancer medicines: a cross-sectional study in punjab, pakistan
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29903783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019015
work_keys_str_mv AT saqibanum availabilityandaffordabilityofbiologicversusnonbiologicanticancermedicinesacrosssectionalstudyinpunjabpakistan
AT iftikharsadia availabilityandaffordabilityofbiologicversusnonbiologicanticancermedicinesacrosssectionalstudyinpunjabpakistan
AT sarwarmuhammadrehan availabilityandaffordabilityofbiologicversusnonbiologicanticancermedicinesacrosssectionalstudyinpunjabpakistan