Cargando…
Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study
INTRODUCTION: Chronic lateral epicondylosis (CLE) of the elbow is a prevalent condition among middle-aged people with no consensus on optimal care management but for which surgery is generally accepted as a second intention treatment. Among conservative treatment options, ultrasound (US)-guided fene...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29886446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021373 |
_version_ | 1783333413555535872 |
---|---|
author | Lungu, Eugen Grondin, Philippe Tétreault, Patrice Desmeules, François Cloutier, Guy Choinière, Manon Bureau, Nathalie J |
author_facet | Lungu, Eugen Grondin, Philippe Tétreault, Patrice Desmeules, François Cloutier, Guy Choinière, Manon Bureau, Nathalie J |
author_sort | Lungu, Eugen |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Chronic lateral epicondylosis (CLE) of the elbow is a prevalent condition among middle-aged people with no consensus on optimal care management but for which surgery is generally accepted as a second intention treatment. Among conservative treatment options, ultrasound (US)-guided fenestration has shown encouraging results that should be explored before surgery is considered. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of US-guided fenestration with open-release surgery in patients with failure to improve following a minimum 6 months of conservative treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study protocol entails a two-arm, single-blinded, randomised, controlled design. Sixty-four eligible patients with clinically confirmed CLE will be assigned to either US-guided fenestration or open-release surgery. Fisher’s exact test will be used to compare the proportion of patients reporting a change of 11/100 points or more in the Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation score at 6 months, according to an intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary analyses will compare the two treatment groups in terms of pain and disability, functional limitations at work, pain-free grip strength, medication burden, patients’ global impression of change and level of satisfaction at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months, using mixed linear models for repeated measures or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Finally, recursive partitioning analyses will investigate US and elastography parameters as predictors of treatment success at 6 and 12 months. This data will contribute to evidence-based treatment guidelines for CLE and explore the value of imaging biomarkers to improve risk stratification plans and assist clinicians. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Research Ethics Board of our institution on 23 March 2016 (REB 15.327). In case of important protocol modifications, a new version of the protocol with appropriate amendments will be submitted to the REB for approval. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02710682. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6009557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60095572018-06-25 Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study Lungu, Eugen Grondin, Philippe Tétreault, Patrice Desmeules, François Cloutier, Guy Choinière, Manon Bureau, Nathalie J BMJ Open Radiology and Imaging INTRODUCTION: Chronic lateral epicondylosis (CLE) of the elbow is a prevalent condition among middle-aged people with no consensus on optimal care management but for which surgery is generally accepted as a second intention treatment. Among conservative treatment options, ultrasound (US)-guided fenestration has shown encouraging results that should be explored before surgery is considered. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of US-guided fenestration with open-release surgery in patients with failure to improve following a minimum 6 months of conservative treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study protocol entails a two-arm, single-blinded, randomised, controlled design. Sixty-four eligible patients with clinically confirmed CLE will be assigned to either US-guided fenestration or open-release surgery. Fisher’s exact test will be used to compare the proportion of patients reporting a change of 11/100 points or more in the Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation score at 6 months, according to an intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary analyses will compare the two treatment groups in terms of pain and disability, functional limitations at work, pain-free grip strength, medication burden, patients’ global impression of change and level of satisfaction at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months, using mixed linear models for repeated measures or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Finally, recursive partitioning analyses will investigate US and elastography parameters as predictors of treatment success at 6 and 12 months. This data will contribute to evidence-based treatment guidelines for CLE and explore the value of imaging biomarkers to improve risk stratification plans and assist clinicians. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Research Ethics Board of our institution on 23 March 2016 (REB 15.327). In case of important protocol modifications, a new version of the protocol with appropriate amendments will be submitted to the REB for approval. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02710682. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6009557/ /pubmed/29886446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021373 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Radiology and Imaging Lungu, Eugen Grondin, Philippe Tétreault, Patrice Desmeules, François Cloutier, Guy Choinière, Manon Bureau, Nathalie J Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study |
title | Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study |
title_full | Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study |
title_short | Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study |
title_sort | ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study |
topic | Radiology and Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29886446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021373 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lungueugen ultrasoundguidedtendonfenestrationversusopenreleasesurgeryforthetreatmentofchroniclateralepicondylosisoftheelbowprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedsingleblindedstudy AT grondinphilippe ultrasoundguidedtendonfenestrationversusopenreleasesurgeryforthetreatmentofchroniclateralepicondylosisoftheelbowprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedsingleblindedstudy AT tetreaultpatrice ultrasoundguidedtendonfenestrationversusopenreleasesurgeryforthetreatmentofchroniclateralepicondylosisoftheelbowprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedsingleblindedstudy AT desmeulesfrancois ultrasoundguidedtendonfenestrationversusopenreleasesurgeryforthetreatmentofchroniclateralepicondylosisoftheelbowprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedsingleblindedstudy AT cloutierguy ultrasoundguidedtendonfenestrationversusopenreleasesurgeryforthetreatmentofchroniclateralepicondylosisoftheelbowprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedsingleblindedstudy AT choinieremanon ultrasoundguidedtendonfenestrationversusopenreleasesurgeryforthetreatmentofchroniclateralepicondylosisoftheelbowprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedsingleblindedstudy AT bureaunathaliej ultrasoundguidedtendonfenestrationversusopenreleasesurgeryforthetreatmentofchroniclateralepicondylosisoftheelbowprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedsingleblindedstudy |