Cargando…

Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study

INTRODUCTION: Chronic lateral epicondylosis (CLE) of the elbow is a prevalent condition among middle-aged people with no consensus on optimal care management but for which surgery is generally accepted as a second intention treatment. Among conservative treatment options, ultrasound (US)-guided fene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lungu, Eugen, Grondin, Philippe, Tétreault, Patrice, Desmeules, François, Cloutier, Guy, Choinière, Manon, Bureau, Nathalie J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29886446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021373
_version_ 1783333413555535872
author Lungu, Eugen
Grondin, Philippe
Tétreault, Patrice
Desmeules, François
Cloutier, Guy
Choinière, Manon
Bureau, Nathalie J
author_facet Lungu, Eugen
Grondin, Philippe
Tétreault, Patrice
Desmeules, François
Cloutier, Guy
Choinière, Manon
Bureau, Nathalie J
author_sort Lungu, Eugen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chronic lateral epicondylosis (CLE) of the elbow is a prevalent condition among middle-aged people with no consensus on optimal care management but for which surgery is generally accepted as a second intention treatment. Among conservative treatment options, ultrasound (US)-guided fenestration has shown encouraging results that should be explored before surgery is considered. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of US-guided fenestration with open-release surgery in patients with failure to improve following a minimum 6 months of conservative treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study protocol entails a two-arm, single-blinded, randomised, controlled design. Sixty-four eligible patients with clinically confirmed CLE will be assigned to either US-guided fenestration or open-release surgery. Fisher’s exact test will be used to compare the proportion of patients reporting a change of 11/100 points or more in the Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation score at 6 months, according to an intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary analyses will compare the two treatment groups in terms of pain and disability, functional limitations at work, pain-free grip strength, medication burden, patients’ global impression of change and level of satisfaction at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months, using mixed linear models for repeated measures or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Finally, recursive partitioning analyses will investigate US and elastography parameters as predictors of treatment success at 6 and 12 months. This data will contribute to evidence-based treatment guidelines for CLE and explore the value of imaging biomarkers to improve risk stratification plans and assist clinicians. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Research Ethics Board of our institution on 23 March 2016 (REB 15.327). In case of important protocol modifications, a new version of the protocol with appropriate amendments will be submitted to the REB for approval. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02710682.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6009557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60095572018-06-25 Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study Lungu, Eugen Grondin, Philippe Tétreault, Patrice Desmeules, François Cloutier, Guy Choinière, Manon Bureau, Nathalie J BMJ Open Radiology and Imaging INTRODUCTION: Chronic lateral epicondylosis (CLE) of the elbow is a prevalent condition among middle-aged people with no consensus on optimal care management but for which surgery is generally accepted as a second intention treatment. Among conservative treatment options, ultrasound (US)-guided fenestration has shown encouraging results that should be explored before surgery is considered. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of US-guided fenestration with open-release surgery in patients with failure to improve following a minimum 6 months of conservative treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study protocol entails a two-arm, single-blinded, randomised, controlled design. Sixty-four eligible patients with clinically confirmed CLE will be assigned to either US-guided fenestration or open-release surgery. Fisher’s exact test will be used to compare the proportion of patients reporting a change of 11/100 points or more in the Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation score at 6 months, according to an intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary analyses will compare the two treatment groups in terms of pain and disability, functional limitations at work, pain-free grip strength, medication burden, patients’ global impression of change and level of satisfaction at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months, using mixed linear models for repeated measures or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Finally, recursive partitioning analyses will investigate US and elastography parameters as predictors of treatment success at 6 and 12 months. This data will contribute to evidence-based treatment guidelines for CLE and explore the value of imaging biomarkers to improve risk stratification plans and assist clinicians. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Research Ethics Board of our institution on 23 March 2016 (REB 15.327). In case of important protocol modifications, a new version of the protocol with appropriate amendments will be submitted to the REB for approval. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02710682. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6009557/ /pubmed/29886446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021373 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Radiology and Imaging
Lungu, Eugen
Grondin, Philippe
Tétreault, Patrice
Desmeules, François
Cloutier, Guy
Choinière, Manon
Bureau, Nathalie J
Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study
title Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study
title_full Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study
title_fullStr Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study
title_short Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study
title_sort ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration versus open-release surgery for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis of the elbow: protocol for a prospective, randomised, single blinded study
topic Radiology and Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29886446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021373
work_keys_str_mv AT lungueugen ultrasoundguidedtendonfenestrationversusopenreleasesurgeryforthetreatmentofchroniclateralepicondylosisoftheelbowprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedsingleblindedstudy
AT grondinphilippe ultrasoundguidedtendonfenestrationversusopenreleasesurgeryforthetreatmentofchroniclateralepicondylosisoftheelbowprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedsingleblindedstudy
AT tetreaultpatrice ultrasoundguidedtendonfenestrationversusopenreleasesurgeryforthetreatmentofchroniclateralepicondylosisoftheelbowprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedsingleblindedstudy
AT desmeulesfrancois ultrasoundguidedtendonfenestrationversusopenreleasesurgeryforthetreatmentofchroniclateralepicondylosisoftheelbowprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedsingleblindedstudy
AT cloutierguy ultrasoundguidedtendonfenestrationversusopenreleasesurgeryforthetreatmentofchroniclateralepicondylosisoftheelbowprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedsingleblindedstudy
AT choinieremanon ultrasoundguidedtendonfenestrationversusopenreleasesurgeryforthetreatmentofchroniclateralepicondylosisoftheelbowprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedsingleblindedstudy
AT bureaunathaliej ultrasoundguidedtendonfenestrationversusopenreleasesurgeryforthetreatmentofchroniclateralepicondylosisoftheelbowprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedsingleblindedstudy