Cargando…
Protection of pregnant women at work in Switzerland: practices, obstacles and resources. A mixed-methods study protocol
INTRODUCTION: Like most industrialised countries, Switzerland has introduced legislation to protect the health of pregnant workers and their unborn children from workplace exposure. This legislation provides for a risk assessment, adaptations to workplaces and, if the danger is not eliminated, preve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29903801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023532 |
_version_ | 1783333415930560512 |
---|---|
author | Krief, Peggy Zellweger, Alessia Politis Mercier, Maria-Pia Danuser, Brigitta Wild, Pascal Zenoni, Michela Probst, Isabelle |
author_facet | Krief, Peggy Zellweger, Alessia Politis Mercier, Maria-Pia Danuser, Brigitta Wild, Pascal Zenoni, Michela Probst, Isabelle |
author_sort | Krief, Peggy |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Like most industrialised countries, Switzerland has introduced legislation to protect the health of pregnant workers and their unborn children from workplace exposure. This legislation provides for a risk assessment, adaptations to workplaces and, if the danger is not eliminated, preventive leave (prescribed by a gynaecologist). This study’s first objective is to analyse the degree to which companies, gynaecologists and midwives implement the law. Its second objective is to understand the obstacles and resources of this implementation, with a focus on how relevant stakeholders perceive protective measures and their involvement with them. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Data will be collected using mixed methods: (1) online questionnaires for gynaecologists and midwives; telephone questionnaires with company human resources (HR) managers in the healthcare and food production sectors; (2a) case studies of 6–8 companies in each sector, including interviews with stakeholders such as women workers, HR managers and occupational health physicians; (2b) two focus groups, one involving occupational physicians and hygienists, one involving labour inspectors. Quantitative data will be analysed statistically using STATA software V.15. Qualitative data will be transcribed and thematically analysed using MaxQDA software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Human Research Ethics Committee of the Canton Vaud (CER-VD) has certified that this research study protocol falls outside of the field of application of the Swiss Federal Act on Research Involving Humans. The publications and recommendations resulting from this study will form the starting point for future improvements to the protection of pregnant women at work and their unborn children. This study started in February 2017 and will continue until January 2020. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6009567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60095672018-06-25 Protection of pregnant women at work in Switzerland: practices, obstacles and resources. A mixed-methods study protocol Krief, Peggy Zellweger, Alessia Politis Mercier, Maria-Pia Danuser, Brigitta Wild, Pascal Zenoni, Michela Probst, Isabelle BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine INTRODUCTION: Like most industrialised countries, Switzerland has introduced legislation to protect the health of pregnant workers and their unborn children from workplace exposure. This legislation provides for a risk assessment, adaptations to workplaces and, if the danger is not eliminated, preventive leave (prescribed by a gynaecologist). This study’s first objective is to analyse the degree to which companies, gynaecologists and midwives implement the law. Its second objective is to understand the obstacles and resources of this implementation, with a focus on how relevant stakeholders perceive protective measures and their involvement with them. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Data will be collected using mixed methods: (1) online questionnaires for gynaecologists and midwives; telephone questionnaires with company human resources (HR) managers in the healthcare and food production sectors; (2a) case studies of 6–8 companies in each sector, including interviews with stakeholders such as women workers, HR managers and occupational health physicians; (2b) two focus groups, one involving occupational physicians and hygienists, one involving labour inspectors. Quantitative data will be analysed statistically using STATA software V.15. Qualitative data will be transcribed and thematically analysed using MaxQDA software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Human Research Ethics Committee of the Canton Vaud (CER-VD) has certified that this research study protocol falls outside of the field of application of the Swiss Federal Act on Research Involving Humans. The publications and recommendations resulting from this study will form the starting point for future improvements to the protection of pregnant women at work and their unborn children. This study started in February 2017 and will continue until January 2020. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6009567/ /pubmed/29903801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023532 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Occupational and Environmental Medicine Krief, Peggy Zellweger, Alessia Politis Mercier, Maria-Pia Danuser, Brigitta Wild, Pascal Zenoni, Michela Probst, Isabelle Protection of pregnant women at work in Switzerland: practices, obstacles and resources. A mixed-methods study protocol |
title | Protection of pregnant women at work in Switzerland: practices, obstacles and resources. A mixed-methods study protocol |
title_full | Protection of pregnant women at work in Switzerland: practices, obstacles and resources. A mixed-methods study protocol |
title_fullStr | Protection of pregnant women at work in Switzerland: practices, obstacles and resources. A mixed-methods study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Protection of pregnant women at work in Switzerland: practices, obstacles and resources. A mixed-methods study protocol |
title_short | Protection of pregnant women at work in Switzerland: practices, obstacles and resources. A mixed-methods study protocol |
title_sort | protection of pregnant women at work in switzerland: practices, obstacles and resources. a mixed-methods study protocol |
topic | Occupational and Environmental Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29903801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023532 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kriefpeggy protectionofpregnantwomenatworkinswitzerlandpracticesobstaclesandresourcesamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT zellwegeralessia protectionofpregnantwomenatworkinswitzerlandpracticesobstaclesandresourcesamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT politismerciermariapia protectionofpregnantwomenatworkinswitzerlandpracticesobstaclesandresourcesamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT danuserbrigitta protectionofpregnantwomenatworkinswitzerlandpracticesobstaclesandresourcesamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT wildpascal protectionofpregnantwomenatworkinswitzerlandpracticesobstaclesandresourcesamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT zenonimichela protectionofpregnantwomenatworkinswitzerlandpracticesobstaclesandresourcesamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT probstisabelle protectionofpregnantwomenatworkinswitzerlandpracticesobstaclesandresourcesamixedmethodsstudyprotocol |