Cargando…
The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of low-friction (LF) bedding on graft loss in an acute burn care setting, and to examine the feasibility and costs of using LF bedding compared with standard care. DESIGN: Proof of concept before and after study with feasibility of delivering the intervention. SETT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29903799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021886 |
_version_ | 1783333426135302144 |
---|---|
author | Hollén, Linda Greenwood, Rosemary Kandiyali, Rebecca Ingram, Jenny Foy, Chris George, Susan Mulligan, Sandra Spickett-Jones, Francesca Booth, Simon Sack, Anthony Emond, Alan Dunn, Ken Young, Amber |
author_facet | Hollén, Linda Greenwood, Rosemary Kandiyali, Rebecca Ingram, Jenny Foy, Chris George, Susan Mulligan, Sandra Spickett-Jones, Francesca Booth, Simon Sack, Anthony Emond, Alan Dunn, Ken Young, Amber |
author_sort | Hollén, Linda |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of low-friction (LF) bedding on graft loss in an acute burn care setting, and to examine the feasibility and costs of using LF bedding compared with standard care. DESIGN: Proof of concept before and after study with feasibility of delivering the intervention. SETTING: Three burns services within two UK hospital trusts. PARTICIPANTS: Inclusion criteria were patients older than 4 weeks, who received a skin graft after burn injury and were admitted overnight. The comparator cohort were eligible patients admitted in a 12-month period before the intervention. INTERVENTION: Introduction of LF sheets and pillowcases during a 15-month period. OUTCOME MEASURES: For proof of concept, the LF and comparator cohorts were compared in terms of number of regrafting operations (primary), percentage graft loss, hospital length of stay (LoS) and LoS cost (secondary). Feasibility outcomes were practicality and safety of using LF bedding. RESULTS: 131 patients were eligible for the LF cohort and 90 patients for the comparator cohort. Although the primary outcome of the proportion needing regrafting was halved in the LF cohort, the confidence interval (CI) crossed 1 (OR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.16 to 1.88)). Partial graft loss (any loss) was significantly reduced in the LF cohort (OR (95% CI): 0.27 (0.14, 0.51)). Inpatient LoS was no different between the two cohorts (difference in median days (95% CI): 0 (−2 to 1)), and the estimated difference in LoS cost was £−1139 (−4829 to 2551). Practical issues were easily resolved, and no safety incidents occurred while patients were nursed on LF bedding. CONCLUSIONS: LF bedding is safe to use in burned patients with skin grafts and we have shown proof of concept for the intervention. Further economic modelling is required to see if an appropriately powered randomised control trial would be worthwhile or if roll out across the National Health Service is justified. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN82599687. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6009614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60096142018-06-25 The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns Hollén, Linda Greenwood, Rosemary Kandiyali, Rebecca Ingram, Jenny Foy, Chris George, Susan Mulligan, Sandra Spickett-Jones, Francesca Booth, Simon Sack, Anthony Emond, Alan Dunn, Ken Young, Amber BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of low-friction (LF) bedding on graft loss in an acute burn care setting, and to examine the feasibility and costs of using LF bedding compared with standard care. DESIGN: Proof of concept before and after study with feasibility of delivering the intervention. SETTING: Three burns services within two UK hospital trusts. PARTICIPANTS: Inclusion criteria were patients older than 4 weeks, who received a skin graft after burn injury and were admitted overnight. The comparator cohort were eligible patients admitted in a 12-month period before the intervention. INTERVENTION: Introduction of LF sheets and pillowcases during a 15-month period. OUTCOME MEASURES: For proof of concept, the LF and comparator cohorts were compared in terms of number of regrafting operations (primary), percentage graft loss, hospital length of stay (LoS) and LoS cost (secondary). Feasibility outcomes were practicality and safety of using LF bedding. RESULTS: 131 patients were eligible for the LF cohort and 90 patients for the comparator cohort. Although the primary outcome of the proportion needing regrafting was halved in the LF cohort, the confidence interval (CI) crossed 1 (OR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.16 to 1.88)). Partial graft loss (any loss) was significantly reduced in the LF cohort (OR (95% CI): 0.27 (0.14, 0.51)). Inpatient LoS was no different between the two cohorts (difference in median days (95% CI): 0 (−2 to 1)), and the estimated difference in LoS cost was £−1139 (−4829 to 2551). Practical issues were easily resolved, and no safety incidents occurred while patients were nursed on LF bedding. CONCLUSIONS: LF bedding is safe to use in burned patients with skin grafts and we have shown proof of concept for the intervention. Further economic modelling is required to see if an appropriately powered randomised control trial would be worthwhile or if roll out across the National Health Service is justified. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN82599687. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6009614/ /pubmed/29903799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021886 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice Hollén, Linda Greenwood, Rosemary Kandiyali, Rebecca Ingram, Jenny Foy, Chris George, Susan Mulligan, Sandra Spickett-Jones, Francesca Booth, Simon Sack, Anthony Emond, Alan Dunn, Ken Young, Amber The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns |
title | The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns |
title_full | The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns |
title_fullStr | The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns |
title_full_unstemmed | The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns |
title_short | The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns |
title_sort | silkie (skin grafting low friktion environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29903799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021886 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hollenlinda thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT greenwoodrosemary thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT kandiyalirebecca thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT ingramjenny thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT foychris thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT georgesusan thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT mulligansandra thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT spickettjonesfrancesca thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT boothsimon thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT sackanthony thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT emondalan thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT dunnken thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT youngamber thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT hollenlinda silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT greenwoodrosemary silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT kandiyalirebecca silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT ingramjenny silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT foychris silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT georgesusan silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT mulligansandra silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT spickettjonesfrancesca silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT boothsimon silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT sackanthony silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT emondalan silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT dunnken silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns AT youngamber silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns |