Cargando…

The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of low-friction (LF) bedding on graft loss in an acute burn care setting, and to examine the feasibility and costs of using LF bedding compared with standard care. DESIGN: Proof of concept before and after study with feasibility of delivering the intervention. SETT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollén, Linda, Greenwood, Rosemary, Kandiyali, Rebecca, Ingram, Jenny, Foy, Chris, George, Susan, Mulligan, Sandra, Spickett-Jones, Francesca, Booth, Simon, Sack, Anthony, Emond, Alan, Dunn, Ken, Young, Amber
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29903799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021886
_version_ 1783333426135302144
author Hollén, Linda
Greenwood, Rosemary
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Ingram, Jenny
Foy, Chris
George, Susan
Mulligan, Sandra
Spickett-Jones, Francesca
Booth, Simon
Sack, Anthony
Emond, Alan
Dunn, Ken
Young, Amber
author_facet Hollén, Linda
Greenwood, Rosemary
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Ingram, Jenny
Foy, Chris
George, Susan
Mulligan, Sandra
Spickett-Jones, Francesca
Booth, Simon
Sack, Anthony
Emond, Alan
Dunn, Ken
Young, Amber
author_sort Hollén, Linda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of low-friction (LF) bedding on graft loss in an acute burn care setting, and to examine the feasibility and costs of using LF bedding compared with standard care. DESIGN: Proof of concept before and after study with feasibility of delivering the intervention. SETTING: Three burns services within two UK hospital trusts. PARTICIPANTS: Inclusion criteria were patients older than 4 weeks, who received a skin graft after burn injury and were admitted overnight. The comparator cohort were eligible patients admitted in a 12-month period before the intervention. INTERVENTION: Introduction of LF sheets and pillowcases during a 15-month period. OUTCOME MEASURES: For proof of concept, the LF and comparator cohorts were compared in terms of number of regrafting operations (primary), percentage graft loss, hospital length of stay (LoS) and LoS cost (secondary). Feasibility outcomes were practicality and safety of using LF bedding. RESULTS: 131 patients were eligible for the LF cohort and 90 patients for the comparator cohort. Although the primary outcome of the proportion needing regrafting was halved in the LF cohort, the confidence interval (CI) crossed 1 (OR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.16 to 1.88)). Partial graft loss (any loss) was significantly reduced in the LF cohort (OR (95% CI): 0.27 (0.14, 0.51)). Inpatient LoS was no different between the two cohorts (difference in median days (95% CI): 0 (−2 to 1)), and the estimated difference in LoS cost was £−1139 (−4829 to 2551). Practical issues were easily resolved, and no safety incidents occurred while patients were nursed on LF bedding. CONCLUSIONS: LF bedding is safe to use in burned patients with skin grafts and we have shown proof of concept for the intervention. Further economic modelling is required to see if an appropriately powered randomised control trial would be worthwhile or if roll out across the National Health Service is justified. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN82599687.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6009614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60096142018-06-25 The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns Hollén, Linda Greenwood, Rosemary Kandiyali, Rebecca Ingram, Jenny Foy, Chris George, Susan Mulligan, Sandra Spickett-Jones, Francesca Booth, Simon Sack, Anthony Emond, Alan Dunn, Ken Young, Amber BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of low-friction (LF) bedding on graft loss in an acute burn care setting, and to examine the feasibility and costs of using LF bedding compared with standard care. DESIGN: Proof of concept before and after study with feasibility of delivering the intervention. SETTING: Three burns services within two UK hospital trusts. PARTICIPANTS: Inclusion criteria were patients older than 4 weeks, who received a skin graft after burn injury and were admitted overnight. The comparator cohort were eligible patients admitted in a 12-month period before the intervention. INTERVENTION: Introduction of LF sheets and pillowcases during a 15-month period. OUTCOME MEASURES: For proof of concept, the LF and comparator cohorts were compared in terms of number of regrafting operations (primary), percentage graft loss, hospital length of stay (LoS) and LoS cost (secondary). Feasibility outcomes were practicality and safety of using LF bedding. RESULTS: 131 patients were eligible for the LF cohort and 90 patients for the comparator cohort. Although the primary outcome of the proportion needing regrafting was halved in the LF cohort, the confidence interval (CI) crossed 1 (OR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.16 to 1.88)). Partial graft loss (any loss) was significantly reduced in the LF cohort (OR (95% CI): 0.27 (0.14, 0.51)). Inpatient LoS was no different between the two cohorts (difference in median days (95% CI): 0 (−2 to 1)), and the estimated difference in LoS cost was £−1139 (−4829 to 2551). Practical issues were easily resolved, and no safety incidents occurred while patients were nursed on LF bedding. CONCLUSIONS: LF bedding is safe to use in burned patients with skin grafts and we have shown proof of concept for the intervention. Further economic modelling is required to see if an appropriately powered randomised control trial would be worthwhile or if roll out across the National Health Service is justified. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN82599687. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6009614/ /pubmed/29903799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021886 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Hollén, Linda
Greenwood, Rosemary
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Ingram, Jenny
Foy, Chris
George, Susan
Mulligan, Sandra
Spickett-Jones, Francesca
Booth, Simon
Sack, Anthony
Emond, Alan
Dunn, Ken
Young, Amber
The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns
title The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns
title_full The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns
title_fullStr The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns
title_full_unstemmed The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns
title_short The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns
title_sort silkie (skin grafting low friktion environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29903799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021886
work_keys_str_mv AT hollenlinda thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT greenwoodrosemary thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT kandiyalirebecca thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT ingramjenny thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT foychris thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT georgesusan thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT mulligansandra thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT spickettjonesfrancesca thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT boothsimon thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT sackanthony thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT emondalan thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT dunnken thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT youngamber thesilkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT hollenlinda silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT greenwoodrosemary silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT kandiyalirebecca silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT ingramjenny silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT foychris silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT georgesusan silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT mulligansandra silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT spickettjonesfrancesca silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT boothsimon silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT sackanthony silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT emondalan silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT dunnken silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns
AT youngamber silkieskingraftinglowfriktionenvironmentstudyanonrandomisedproofofconceptandfeasibilitystudyontheimpactoflowfrictionnursingenvironmentonskingraftingsuccessratesinadultandpaediatricburns