Cargando…

Realist Evaluation of the Use of Patient Experience Data to Improve the Quality of Inpatient Mental Health Care (EURIPIDES) in England: study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Inpatient mental healthcare continues to be an area of high risk and where patients report negative experiences. To ensure the patient voice is heard, National Health Service (NHS) Trusts are required to collect feedback from patients routinely. We do not know what kinds of feedback ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weich, Scott, Fenton, Sarah-Jane Hannah, Bhui, Kamaldeep, Staniszewska, Sophie, Madan, Jason, Larkin, Michael, Newton, Elizabeth, Crepaz-Keay, David, Canaway, Alastair, Croft, Charlotte, Griffiths, Frances
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29903792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021013
_version_ 1783333426641764352
author Weich, Scott
Fenton, Sarah-Jane Hannah
Bhui, Kamaldeep
Staniszewska, Sophie
Madan, Jason
Larkin, Michael
Newton, Elizabeth
Crepaz-Keay, David
Canaway, Alastair
Croft, Charlotte
Griffiths, Frances
author_facet Weich, Scott
Fenton, Sarah-Jane Hannah
Bhui, Kamaldeep
Staniszewska, Sophie
Madan, Jason
Larkin, Michael
Newton, Elizabeth
Crepaz-Keay, David
Canaway, Alastair
Croft, Charlotte
Griffiths, Frances
author_sort Weich, Scott
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Inpatient mental healthcare continues to be an area of high risk and where patients report negative experiences. To ensure the patient voice is heard, National Health Service (NHS) Trusts are required to collect feedback from patients routinely. We do not know what kinds of feedback are most important or what management processes are needed to translate this into effective action plans. Further, we do not know if this makes any difference to the patients themselves. This study seeks to explore which of the many different approaches to collecting and using patient experience data are the most useful for supporting improvements in inpatient mental healthcare. The overarching aim of the study is to arrive at recommendations for best practice in the collection and use of patient experience data in NHS England adult inpatient mental health settings. We present the protocol for Realist Evaluation of the Use of Patient Experience Data to Improve the Quality of Inpatient Mental Health Care study (EURIPIDES). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is composed of five work packages (WPs), including a systematic review of patient experiences (WP1); a telephone survey to assist the selection of case sites (WP2); six indepth case studies involving interviews with service users, carers and staff to enable a realist evaluation of the use of patient experience to improve quality in adult inpatient mental health services (WP3); an economic evaluation of patient experience feedback activity (WP5); and a consensus conference (WP4). We discuss the methodological rationale for the five WPs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval from West Midlands/South Birmingham NHS Research Ethics Committee. The outcome of the consensus conference meeting (WP4) will form the basis of the outputs to be disseminated to NHS providers. Dissemination will also take place through publications and presentations at relevant conferences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6009616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60096162018-06-25 Realist Evaluation of the Use of Patient Experience Data to Improve the Quality of Inpatient Mental Health Care (EURIPIDES) in England: study protocol Weich, Scott Fenton, Sarah-Jane Hannah Bhui, Kamaldeep Staniszewska, Sophie Madan, Jason Larkin, Michael Newton, Elizabeth Crepaz-Keay, David Canaway, Alastair Croft, Charlotte Griffiths, Frances BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Inpatient mental healthcare continues to be an area of high risk and where patients report negative experiences. To ensure the patient voice is heard, National Health Service (NHS) Trusts are required to collect feedback from patients routinely. We do not know what kinds of feedback are most important or what management processes are needed to translate this into effective action plans. Further, we do not know if this makes any difference to the patients themselves. This study seeks to explore which of the many different approaches to collecting and using patient experience data are the most useful for supporting improvements in inpatient mental healthcare. The overarching aim of the study is to arrive at recommendations for best practice in the collection and use of patient experience data in NHS England adult inpatient mental health settings. We present the protocol for Realist Evaluation of the Use of Patient Experience Data to Improve the Quality of Inpatient Mental Health Care study (EURIPIDES). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is composed of five work packages (WPs), including a systematic review of patient experiences (WP1); a telephone survey to assist the selection of case sites (WP2); six indepth case studies involving interviews with service users, carers and staff to enable a realist evaluation of the use of patient experience to improve quality in adult inpatient mental health services (WP3); an economic evaluation of patient experience feedback activity (WP5); and a consensus conference (WP4). We discuss the methodological rationale for the five WPs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval from West Midlands/South Birmingham NHS Research Ethics Committee. The outcome of the consensus conference meeting (WP4) will form the basis of the outputs to be disseminated to NHS providers. Dissemination will also take place through publications and presentations at relevant conferences. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6009616/ /pubmed/29903792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021013 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Weich, Scott
Fenton, Sarah-Jane Hannah
Bhui, Kamaldeep
Staniszewska, Sophie
Madan, Jason
Larkin, Michael
Newton, Elizabeth
Crepaz-Keay, David
Canaway, Alastair
Croft, Charlotte
Griffiths, Frances
Realist Evaluation of the Use of Patient Experience Data to Improve the Quality of Inpatient Mental Health Care (EURIPIDES) in England: study protocol
title Realist Evaluation of the Use of Patient Experience Data to Improve the Quality of Inpatient Mental Health Care (EURIPIDES) in England: study protocol
title_full Realist Evaluation of the Use of Patient Experience Data to Improve the Quality of Inpatient Mental Health Care (EURIPIDES) in England: study protocol
title_fullStr Realist Evaluation of the Use of Patient Experience Data to Improve the Quality of Inpatient Mental Health Care (EURIPIDES) in England: study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Realist Evaluation of the Use of Patient Experience Data to Improve the Quality of Inpatient Mental Health Care (EURIPIDES) in England: study protocol
title_short Realist Evaluation of the Use of Patient Experience Data to Improve the Quality of Inpatient Mental Health Care (EURIPIDES) in England: study protocol
title_sort realist evaluation of the use of patient experience data to improve the quality of inpatient mental health care (euripides) in england: study protocol
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29903792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021013
work_keys_str_mv AT weichscott realistevaluationoftheuseofpatientexperiencedatatoimprovethequalityofinpatientmentalhealthcareeuripidesinenglandstudyprotocol
AT fentonsarahjanehannah realistevaluationoftheuseofpatientexperiencedatatoimprovethequalityofinpatientmentalhealthcareeuripidesinenglandstudyprotocol
AT bhuikamaldeep realistevaluationoftheuseofpatientexperiencedatatoimprovethequalityofinpatientmentalhealthcareeuripidesinenglandstudyprotocol
AT staniszewskasophie realistevaluationoftheuseofpatientexperiencedatatoimprovethequalityofinpatientmentalhealthcareeuripidesinenglandstudyprotocol
AT madanjason realistevaluationoftheuseofpatientexperiencedatatoimprovethequalityofinpatientmentalhealthcareeuripidesinenglandstudyprotocol
AT larkinmichael realistevaluationoftheuseofpatientexperiencedatatoimprovethequalityofinpatientmentalhealthcareeuripidesinenglandstudyprotocol
AT newtonelizabeth realistevaluationoftheuseofpatientexperiencedatatoimprovethequalityofinpatientmentalhealthcareeuripidesinenglandstudyprotocol
AT crepazkeaydavid realistevaluationoftheuseofpatientexperiencedatatoimprovethequalityofinpatientmentalhealthcareeuripidesinenglandstudyprotocol
AT canawayalastair realistevaluationoftheuseofpatientexperiencedatatoimprovethequalityofinpatientmentalhealthcareeuripidesinenglandstudyprotocol
AT croftcharlotte realistevaluationoftheuseofpatientexperiencedatatoimprovethequalityofinpatientmentalhealthcareeuripidesinenglandstudyprotocol
AT griffithsfrances realistevaluationoftheuseofpatientexperiencedatatoimprovethequalityofinpatientmentalhealthcareeuripidesinenglandstudyprotocol