Cargando…

Anesthesiologists as perioperative hospitalists and outcomes in patients undergoing major urologic surgery: a historical prospective, comparative effectiveness study

BACKGROUND: Perioperative care has been identified as an area of wide variability in quality, with conflicting models, and involving multiple specialties. In 2014, the Loma Linda University Departments of Anesthesiology and Urology implemented a perioperative hospitalist service (PHS), consisting of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stier, Gary, Ramsingh, Davinder, Raval, Ronak, Shih, Gary, Halverson, Bryan, Austin, Briahnna, Soo, Joseph, Ruckle, Herbert, Martin, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29951203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-018-0090-y
_version_ 1783333474141208576
author Stier, Gary
Ramsingh, Davinder
Raval, Ronak
Shih, Gary
Halverson, Bryan
Austin, Briahnna
Soo, Joseph
Ruckle, Herbert
Martin, Robert
author_facet Stier, Gary
Ramsingh, Davinder
Raval, Ronak
Shih, Gary
Halverson, Bryan
Austin, Briahnna
Soo, Joseph
Ruckle, Herbert
Martin, Robert
author_sort Stier, Gary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Perioperative care has been identified as an area of wide variability in quality, with conflicting models, and involving multiple specialties. In 2014, the Loma Linda University Departments of Anesthesiology and Urology implemented a perioperative hospitalist service (PHS), consisting of anesthesiology-trained physicians, to co-manage patients for the entirety of their perioperative period. We hypothesized that implementation of this PHS model would result in an improvement in patient recovery. METHODS: As a quality improvement (QI) initiative, the PHS service was formed of selected anesthesiologists who received training on the core competencies for hospitalist medicine. The service was implemented following a co-management agreement to medically manage patients undergoing major urologic procedures (prostatectomy, cystectomy, and nephrectomy). Impact was assessed by comparisons to data from the year prior to PHS service implementation. Data was compared with and without propensity matching. Primary outcome marker was a reduction in length of stay. Secondary outcome markers included complication rate, return of bowel function, number of consultations, reduction in total direct patient costs, and bed days saved. RESULTS: Significant reductions in length of stay (p <  0.05) were demonstrated for all surgical procedures with propensity matching and were demonstrated for cystectomy and nephrectomy cases without. Significant reductions in complication rates and ileus were also observed for all surgical procedures post-PHS implementation. Additionally, reductions in total direct patient costs and frequency of consultations were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiologists can safely function as perioperative hospitalists, providing appropriate medical management, and significantly improving both patient recovery and throughput. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13741-018-0090-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6009851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60098512018-06-27 Anesthesiologists as perioperative hospitalists and outcomes in patients undergoing major urologic surgery: a historical prospective, comparative effectiveness study Stier, Gary Ramsingh, Davinder Raval, Ronak Shih, Gary Halverson, Bryan Austin, Briahnna Soo, Joseph Ruckle, Herbert Martin, Robert Perioper Med (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Perioperative care has been identified as an area of wide variability in quality, with conflicting models, and involving multiple specialties. In 2014, the Loma Linda University Departments of Anesthesiology and Urology implemented a perioperative hospitalist service (PHS), consisting of anesthesiology-trained physicians, to co-manage patients for the entirety of their perioperative period. We hypothesized that implementation of this PHS model would result in an improvement in patient recovery. METHODS: As a quality improvement (QI) initiative, the PHS service was formed of selected anesthesiologists who received training on the core competencies for hospitalist medicine. The service was implemented following a co-management agreement to medically manage patients undergoing major urologic procedures (prostatectomy, cystectomy, and nephrectomy). Impact was assessed by comparisons to data from the year prior to PHS service implementation. Data was compared with and without propensity matching. Primary outcome marker was a reduction in length of stay. Secondary outcome markers included complication rate, return of bowel function, number of consultations, reduction in total direct patient costs, and bed days saved. RESULTS: Significant reductions in length of stay (p <  0.05) were demonstrated for all surgical procedures with propensity matching and were demonstrated for cystectomy and nephrectomy cases without. Significant reductions in complication rates and ileus were also observed for all surgical procedures post-PHS implementation. Additionally, reductions in total direct patient costs and frequency of consultations were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiologists can safely function as perioperative hospitalists, providing appropriate medical management, and significantly improving both patient recovery and throughput. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13741-018-0090-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6009851/ /pubmed/29951203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-018-0090-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Stier, Gary
Ramsingh, Davinder
Raval, Ronak
Shih, Gary
Halverson, Bryan
Austin, Briahnna
Soo, Joseph
Ruckle, Herbert
Martin, Robert
Anesthesiologists as perioperative hospitalists and outcomes in patients undergoing major urologic surgery: a historical prospective, comparative effectiveness study
title Anesthesiologists as perioperative hospitalists and outcomes in patients undergoing major urologic surgery: a historical prospective, comparative effectiveness study
title_full Anesthesiologists as perioperative hospitalists and outcomes in patients undergoing major urologic surgery: a historical prospective, comparative effectiveness study
title_fullStr Anesthesiologists as perioperative hospitalists and outcomes in patients undergoing major urologic surgery: a historical prospective, comparative effectiveness study
title_full_unstemmed Anesthesiologists as perioperative hospitalists and outcomes in patients undergoing major urologic surgery: a historical prospective, comparative effectiveness study
title_short Anesthesiologists as perioperative hospitalists and outcomes in patients undergoing major urologic surgery: a historical prospective, comparative effectiveness study
title_sort anesthesiologists as perioperative hospitalists and outcomes in patients undergoing major urologic surgery: a historical prospective, comparative effectiveness study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29951203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-018-0090-y
work_keys_str_mv AT stiergary anesthesiologistsasperioperativehospitalistsandoutcomesinpatientsundergoingmajorurologicsurgeryahistoricalprospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT ramsinghdavinder anesthesiologistsasperioperativehospitalistsandoutcomesinpatientsundergoingmajorurologicsurgeryahistoricalprospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT ravalronak anesthesiologistsasperioperativehospitalistsandoutcomesinpatientsundergoingmajorurologicsurgeryahistoricalprospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT shihgary anesthesiologistsasperioperativehospitalistsandoutcomesinpatientsundergoingmajorurologicsurgeryahistoricalprospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT halversonbryan anesthesiologistsasperioperativehospitalistsandoutcomesinpatientsundergoingmajorurologicsurgeryahistoricalprospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT austinbriahnna anesthesiologistsasperioperativehospitalistsandoutcomesinpatientsundergoingmajorurologicsurgeryahistoricalprospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT soojoseph anesthesiologistsasperioperativehospitalistsandoutcomesinpatientsundergoingmajorurologicsurgeryahistoricalprospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT ruckleherbert anesthesiologistsasperioperativehospitalistsandoutcomesinpatientsundergoingmajorurologicsurgeryahistoricalprospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT martinrobert anesthesiologistsasperioperativehospitalistsandoutcomesinpatientsundergoingmajorurologicsurgeryahistoricalprospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudy