Cargando…
Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems
Bioerosion, the removal of calcium carbonate from coral frameworks by living organisms, influences a variety of reef features, from their topographic complexity to the net balance of carbonate budgets. Little is known, however, about how macroborers, which bore into reef substrates leaving traces gr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199462 |
_version_ | 1783333542679281664 |
---|---|
author | Maher, Rebecca L. Johnston, Michelle A. Brandt, Marilyn E. Smith, Tyler B. Correa, Adrienne M. S. |
author_facet | Maher, Rebecca L. Johnston, Michelle A. Brandt, Marilyn E. Smith, Tyler B. Correa, Adrienne M. S. |
author_sort | Maher, Rebecca L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bioerosion, the removal of calcium carbonate from coral frameworks by living organisms, influences a variety of reef features, from their topographic complexity to the net balance of carbonate budgets. Little is known, however, about how macroborers, which bore into reef substrates leaving traces greater than 0.1 mm diameter, are distributed across coral reefs, particularly reef systems with high (>50%) stony coral cover or at mesophotic depths (≥30 m). Here, we present an accurate and efficient method for quantifying macroborer densities from stony coral hosts via image analysis, using the bioeroding barnacle, Lithotrya dorsalis, and its host coral, Orbicella franksi, as a case study. We found that in 2014, L. dorsalis densities varied consistently with depth and host percent cover in two Atlantic reef systems: the Flower Garden Banks (FGB, northwest Gulf of Mexico) and the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI). Although average barnacle density was nearly 4.5 times greater overall in the FGB than in the USVI, barnacle density decreased with depth in both reef regions. Barnacle density also scaled negatively with increasing coral cover in the study areas, suggesting that barnacle populations are not strictly space-limited in their distribution and settlement opportunities. Our findings suggest that depth and host coral cover, and potentially, local factors may strongly influence the abundance of macroborers, and thus the rate of CaCO(3) loss, in a given reef system. Our image analysis method for quantifying macroborers can be standardized across historical and modern reef records to better understand how borers impact host growth and reef health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6010239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60102392018-07-06 Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems Maher, Rebecca L. Johnston, Michelle A. Brandt, Marilyn E. Smith, Tyler B. Correa, Adrienne M. S. PLoS One Research Article Bioerosion, the removal of calcium carbonate from coral frameworks by living organisms, influences a variety of reef features, from their topographic complexity to the net balance of carbonate budgets. Little is known, however, about how macroborers, which bore into reef substrates leaving traces greater than 0.1 mm diameter, are distributed across coral reefs, particularly reef systems with high (>50%) stony coral cover or at mesophotic depths (≥30 m). Here, we present an accurate and efficient method for quantifying macroborer densities from stony coral hosts via image analysis, using the bioeroding barnacle, Lithotrya dorsalis, and its host coral, Orbicella franksi, as a case study. We found that in 2014, L. dorsalis densities varied consistently with depth and host percent cover in two Atlantic reef systems: the Flower Garden Banks (FGB, northwest Gulf of Mexico) and the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI). Although average barnacle density was nearly 4.5 times greater overall in the FGB than in the USVI, barnacle density decreased with depth in both reef regions. Barnacle density also scaled negatively with increasing coral cover in the study areas, suggesting that barnacle populations are not strictly space-limited in their distribution and settlement opportunities. Our findings suggest that depth and host coral cover, and potentially, local factors may strongly influence the abundance of macroborers, and thus the rate of CaCO(3) loss, in a given reef system. Our image analysis method for quantifying macroborers can be standardized across historical and modern reef records to better understand how borers impact host growth and reef health. Public Library of Science 2018-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6010239/ /pubmed/29924857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199462 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Maher, Rebecca L. Johnston, Michelle A. Brandt, Marilyn E. Smith, Tyler B. Correa, Adrienne M. S. Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems |
title | Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems |
title_full | Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems |
title_fullStr | Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems |
title_short | Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems |
title_sort | depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199462 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maherrebeccal depthandcoralcoverdrivethedistributionofacoralmacroboreracrosstworeefsystems AT johnstonmichellea depthandcoralcoverdrivethedistributionofacoralmacroboreracrosstworeefsystems AT brandtmarilyne depthandcoralcoverdrivethedistributionofacoralmacroboreracrosstworeefsystems AT smithtylerb depthandcoralcoverdrivethedistributionofacoralmacroboreracrosstworeefsystems AT correaadriennems depthandcoralcoverdrivethedistributionofacoralmacroboreracrosstworeefsystems |