Cargando…

Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems

Bioerosion, the removal of calcium carbonate from coral frameworks by living organisms, influences a variety of reef features, from their topographic complexity to the net balance of carbonate budgets. Little is known, however, about how macroborers, which bore into reef substrates leaving traces gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maher, Rebecca L., Johnston, Michelle A., Brandt, Marilyn E., Smith, Tyler B., Correa, Adrienne M. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199462
_version_ 1783333542679281664
author Maher, Rebecca L.
Johnston, Michelle A.
Brandt, Marilyn E.
Smith, Tyler B.
Correa, Adrienne M. S.
author_facet Maher, Rebecca L.
Johnston, Michelle A.
Brandt, Marilyn E.
Smith, Tyler B.
Correa, Adrienne M. S.
author_sort Maher, Rebecca L.
collection PubMed
description Bioerosion, the removal of calcium carbonate from coral frameworks by living organisms, influences a variety of reef features, from their topographic complexity to the net balance of carbonate budgets. Little is known, however, about how macroborers, which bore into reef substrates leaving traces greater than 0.1 mm diameter, are distributed across coral reefs, particularly reef systems with high (>50%) stony coral cover or at mesophotic depths (≥30 m). Here, we present an accurate and efficient method for quantifying macroborer densities from stony coral hosts via image analysis, using the bioeroding barnacle, Lithotrya dorsalis, and its host coral, Orbicella franksi, as a case study. We found that in 2014, L. dorsalis densities varied consistently with depth and host percent cover in two Atlantic reef systems: the Flower Garden Banks (FGB, northwest Gulf of Mexico) and the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI). Although average barnacle density was nearly 4.5 times greater overall in the FGB than in the USVI, barnacle density decreased with depth in both reef regions. Barnacle density also scaled negatively with increasing coral cover in the study areas, suggesting that barnacle populations are not strictly space-limited in their distribution and settlement opportunities. Our findings suggest that depth and host coral cover, and potentially, local factors may strongly influence the abundance of macroborers, and thus the rate of CaCO(3) loss, in a given reef system. Our image analysis method for quantifying macroborers can be standardized across historical and modern reef records to better understand how borers impact host growth and reef health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6010239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60102392018-07-06 Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems Maher, Rebecca L. Johnston, Michelle A. Brandt, Marilyn E. Smith, Tyler B. Correa, Adrienne M. S. PLoS One Research Article Bioerosion, the removal of calcium carbonate from coral frameworks by living organisms, influences a variety of reef features, from their topographic complexity to the net balance of carbonate budgets. Little is known, however, about how macroborers, which bore into reef substrates leaving traces greater than 0.1 mm diameter, are distributed across coral reefs, particularly reef systems with high (>50%) stony coral cover or at mesophotic depths (≥30 m). Here, we present an accurate and efficient method for quantifying macroborer densities from stony coral hosts via image analysis, using the bioeroding barnacle, Lithotrya dorsalis, and its host coral, Orbicella franksi, as a case study. We found that in 2014, L. dorsalis densities varied consistently with depth and host percent cover in two Atlantic reef systems: the Flower Garden Banks (FGB, northwest Gulf of Mexico) and the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI). Although average barnacle density was nearly 4.5 times greater overall in the FGB than in the USVI, barnacle density decreased with depth in both reef regions. Barnacle density also scaled negatively with increasing coral cover in the study areas, suggesting that barnacle populations are not strictly space-limited in their distribution and settlement opportunities. Our findings suggest that depth and host coral cover, and potentially, local factors may strongly influence the abundance of macroborers, and thus the rate of CaCO(3) loss, in a given reef system. Our image analysis method for quantifying macroborers can be standardized across historical and modern reef records to better understand how borers impact host growth and reef health. Public Library of Science 2018-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6010239/ /pubmed/29924857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199462 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maher, Rebecca L.
Johnston, Michelle A.
Brandt, Marilyn E.
Smith, Tyler B.
Correa, Adrienne M. S.
Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems
title Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems
title_full Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems
title_fullStr Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems
title_full_unstemmed Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems
title_short Depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems
title_sort depth and coral cover drive the distribution of a coral macroborer across two reef systems
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199462
work_keys_str_mv AT maherrebeccal depthandcoralcoverdrivethedistributionofacoralmacroboreracrosstworeefsystems
AT johnstonmichellea depthandcoralcoverdrivethedistributionofacoralmacroboreracrosstworeefsystems
AT brandtmarilyne depthandcoralcoverdrivethedistributionofacoralmacroboreracrosstworeefsystems
AT smithtylerb depthandcoralcoverdrivethedistributionofacoralmacroboreracrosstworeefsystems
AT correaadriennems depthandcoralcoverdrivethedistributionofacoralmacroboreracrosstworeefsystems