Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators for GPs in dementia advance care planning: A systematic integrative review

BACKGROUND: Due to the disease’s progressive nature, advance care planning (ACP) is recommended for people with early stage dementia. General practitioners (GPs) should initiate ACP because of their longstanding relationships with their patients and their early involvement with the disease, however...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tilburgs, Bram, Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra, Koopmans, Raymond, van Gennip, Hans, Engels, Yvonne, Perry, Marieke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198535
_version_ 1783333551845933056
author Tilburgs, Bram
Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra
Koopmans, Raymond
van Gennip, Hans
Engels, Yvonne
Perry, Marieke
author_facet Tilburgs, Bram
Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra
Koopmans, Raymond
van Gennip, Hans
Engels, Yvonne
Perry, Marieke
author_sort Tilburgs, Bram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to the disease’s progressive nature, advance care planning (ACP) is recommended for people with early stage dementia. General practitioners (GPs) should initiate ACP because of their longstanding relationships with their patients and their early involvement with the disease, however ACP is seldom applied. AIM: To determine the barriers and facilitators faced by GPs related to ACP with people with dementia. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched the relevant databases for papers published between January 1995 and December 2016, using the terms: primary healthcare, GP, dementia, and ACP. We conducted a systematic integrative review following Whittemore and Knafl’s method. Papers containing empirical data about GP barriers and/or facilitators regarding ACP for people with dementia were included. We evaluated quality using the Mixed-Method-Appraisal-Tool and analyzed data using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Ten qualitative, five quantitative, and one mixed-method paper revealed four themes: timely initiation of ACP, stakeholder engagement, important aspects of ACP the conversation, and prerequisites for ACP. Important barriers were: uncertainty about the timing of ACP, how to plan for an uncertain future, lack of knowledge about dementia, difficulties assessing people with dementia’s decisional capacities, and changing preferences. Facilitators for ACP were: an early start when cognitive decline is still mild, inclusion of all stakeholders, and discussing social and medical issues aimed at maintaining normal life. CONCLUSION: Discussing future care is difficult due to uncertainties about the future and the decisional capacities of people with dementia. Based on the facilitators, we recommend that GPs use a timely and goal-oriented approach and involve all stakeholders. ACP discussions should focus on the ability of people with dementia to maintain normal daily function as well as on their quality of life, instead of end-of-life-discussions only. GPs need training to acquire knowledge and skills to timely initiate collaborative ACP discussions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6010277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60102772018-07-06 Barriers and facilitators for GPs in dementia advance care planning: A systematic integrative review Tilburgs, Bram Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra Koopmans, Raymond van Gennip, Hans Engels, Yvonne Perry, Marieke PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Due to the disease’s progressive nature, advance care planning (ACP) is recommended for people with early stage dementia. General practitioners (GPs) should initiate ACP because of their longstanding relationships with their patients and their early involvement with the disease, however ACP is seldom applied. AIM: To determine the barriers and facilitators faced by GPs related to ACP with people with dementia. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched the relevant databases for papers published between January 1995 and December 2016, using the terms: primary healthcare, GP, dementia, and ACP. We conducted a systematic integrative review following Whittemore and Knafl’s method. Papers containing empirical data about GP barriers and/or facilitators regarding ACP for people with dementia were included. We evaluated quality using the Mixed-Method-Appraisal-Tool and analyzed data using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Ten qualitative, five quantitative, and one mixed-method paper revealed four themes: timely initiation of ACP, stakeholder engagement, important aspects of ACP the conversation, and prerequisites for ACP. Important barriers were: uncertainty about the timing of ACP, how to plan for an uncertain future, lack of knowledge about dementia, difficulties assessing people with dementia’s decisional capacities, and changing preferences. Facilitators for ACP were: an early start when cognitive decline is still mild, inclusion of all stakeholders, and discussing social and medical issues aimed at maintaining normal life. CONCLUSION: Discussing future care is difficult due to uncertainties about the future and the decisional capacities of people with dementia. Based on the facilitators, we recommend that GPs use a timely and goal-oriented approach and involve all stakeholders. ACP discussions should focus on the ability of people with dementia to maintain normal daily function as well as on their quality of life, instead of end-of-life-discussions only. GPs need training to acquire knowledge and skills to timely initiate collaborative ACP discussions. Public Library of Science 2018-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6010277/ /pubmed/29924837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198535 Text en © 2018 Tilburgs et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tilburgs, Bram
Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra
Koopmans, Raymond
van Gennip, Hans
Engels, Yvonne
Perry, Marieke
Barriers and facilitators for GPs in dementia advance care planning: A systematic integrative review
title Barriers and facilitators for GPs in dementia advance care planning: A systematic integrative review
title_full Barriers and facilitators for GPs in dementia advance care planning: A systematic integrative review
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators for GPs in dementia advance care planning: A systematic integrative review
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators for GPs in dementia advance care planning: A systematic integrative review
title_short Barriers and facilitators for GPs in dementia advance care planning: A systematic integrative review
title_sort barriers and facilitators for gps in dementia advance care planning: a systematic integrative review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198535
work_keys_str_mv AT tilburgsbram barriersandfacilitatorsforgpsindementiaadvancecareplanningasystematicintegrativereview
AT vernooijdassenmyrra barriersandfacilitatorsforgpsindementiaadvancecareplanningasystematicintegrativereview
AT koopmansraymond barriersandfacilitatorsforgpsindementiaadvancecareplanningasystematicintegrativereview
AT vangenniphans barriersandfacilitatorsforgpsindementiaadvancecareplanningasystematicintegrativereview
AT engelsyvonne barriersandfacilitatorsforgpsindementiaadvancecareplanningasystematicintegrativereview
AT perrymarieke barriersandfacilitatorsforgpsindementiaadvancecareplanningasystematicintegrativereview