Cargando…

Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke

Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are used in stroke rehabilitation to translate brain signals into intended movements of the paralyzed limb. However, the efficacy and mechanisms of BCI-based therapies remain unclear. Here we show that BCI coupled to functional electrical stimulation (FES) elicits sig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biasiucci, A., Leeb, R., Iturrate, I., Perdikis, S., Al-Khodairy, A., Corbet, T., Schnider, A., Schmidlin, T., Zhang, H., Bassolino, M., Viceic, D., Vuadens, P., Guggisberg, A. G., Millán, J. d. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z
_version_ 1783333580484640768
author Biasiucci, A.
Leeb, R.
Iturrate, I.
Perdikis, S.
Al-Khodairy, A.
Corbet, T.
Schnider, A.
Schmidlin, T.
Zhang, H.
Bassolino, M.
Viceic, D.
Vuadens, P.
Guggisberg, A. G.
Millán, J. d. R.
author_facet Biasiucci, A.
Leeb, R.
Iturrate, I.
Perdikis, S.
Al-Khodairy, A.
Corbet, T.
Schnider, A.
Schmidlin, T.
Zhang, H.
Bassolino, M.
Viceic, D.
Vuadens, P.
Guggisberg, A. G.
Millán, J. d. R.
author_sort Biasiucci, A.
collection PubMed
description Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are used in stroke rehabilitation to translate brain signals into intended movements of the paralyzed limb. However, the efficacy and mechanisms of BCI-based therapies remain unclear. Here we show that BCI coupled to functional electrical stimulation (FES) elicits significant, clinically relevant, and lasting motor recovery in chronic stroke survivors more effectively than sham FES. Such recovery is associated to quantitative signatures of functional neuroplasticity. BCI patients exhibit a significant functional recovery after the intervention, which remains 6–12 months after the end of therapy. Electroencephalography analysis pinpoints significant differences in favor of the BCI group, mainly consisting in an increase in functional connectivity between motor areas in the affected hemisphere. This increase is significantly correlated with functional improvement. Results illustrate how a BCI–FES therapy can drive significant functional recovery and purposeful plasticity thanks to contingent activation of body natural efferent and afferent pathways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6010454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60104542018-06-25 Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke Biasiucci, A. Leeb, R. Iturrate, I. Perdikis, S. Al-Khodairy, A. Corbet, T. Schnider, A. Schmidlin, T. Zhang, H. Bassolino, M. Viceic, D. Vuadens, P. Guggisberg, A. G. Millán, J. d. R. Nat Commun Article Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are used in stroke rehabilitation to translate brain signals into intended movements of the paralyzed limb. However, the efficacy and mechanisms of BCI-based therapies remain unclear. Here we show that BCI coupled to functional electrical stimulation (FES) elicits significant, clinically relevant, and lasting motor recovery in chronic stroke survivors more effectively than sham FES. Such recovery is associated to quantitative signatures of functional neuroplasticity. BCI patients exhibit a significant functional recovery after the intervention, which remains 6–12 months after the end of therapy. Electroencephalography analysis pinpoints significant differences in favor of the BCI group, mainly consisting in an increase in functional connectivity between motor areas in the affected hemisphere. This increase is significantly correlated with functional improvement. Results illustrate how a BCI–FES therapy can drive significant functional recovery and purposeful plasticity thanks to contingent activation of body natural efferent and afferent pathways. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6010454/ /pubmed/29925890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Biasiucci, A.
Leeb, R.
Iturrate, I.
Perdikis, S.
Al-Khodairy, A.
Corbet, T.
Schnider, A.
Schmidlin, T.
Zhang, H.
Bassolino, M.
Viceic, D.
Vuadens, P.
Guggisberg, A. G.
Millán, J. d. R.
Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke
title Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke
title_full Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke
title_fullStr Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke
title_full_unstemmed Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke
title_short Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke
title_sort brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z
work_keys_str_mv AT biasiuccia brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke
AT leebr brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke
AT iturratei brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke
AT perdikiss brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke
AT alkhodairya brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke
AT corbett brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke
AT schnidera brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke
AT schmidlint brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke
AT zhangh brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke
AT bassolinom brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke
AT viceicd brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke
AT vuadensp brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke
AT guggisbergag brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke
AT millanjdr brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke