Cargando…
Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke
Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are used in stroke rehabilitation to translate brain signals into intended movements of the paralyzed limb. However, the efficacy and mechanisms of BCI-based therapies remain unclear. Here we show that BCI coupled to functional electrical stimulation (FES) elicits sig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z |
_version_ | 1783333580484640768 |
---|---|
author | Biasiucci, A. Leeb, R. Iturrate, I. Perdikis, S. Al-Khodairy, A. Corbet, T. Schnider, A. Schmidlin, T. Zhang, H. Bassolino, M. Viceic, D. Vuadens, P. Guggisberg, A. G. Millán, J. d. R. |
author_facet | Biasiucci, A. Leeb, R. Iturrate, I. Perdikis, S. Al-Khodairy, A. Corbet, T. Schnider, A. Schmidlin, T. Zhang, H. Bassolino, M. Viceic, D. Vuadens, P. Guggisberg, A. G. Millán, J. d. R. |
author_sort | Biasiucci, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are used in stroke rehabilitation to translate brain signals into intended movements of the paralyzed limb. However, the efficacy and mechanisms of BCI-based therapies remain unclear. Here we show that BCI coupled to functional electrical stimulation (FES) elicits significant, clinically relevant, and lasting motor recovery in chronic stroke survivors more effectively than sham FES. Such recovery is associated to quantitative signatures of functional neuroplasticity. BCI patients exhibit a significant functional recovery after the intervention, which remains 6–12 months after the end of therapy. Electroencephalography analysis pinpoints significant differences in favor of the BCI group, mainly consisting in an increase in functional connectivity between motor areas in the affected hemisphere. This increase is significantly correlated with functional improvement. Results illustrate how a BCI–FES therapy can drive significant functional recovery and purposeful plasticity thanks to contingent activation of body natural efferent and afferent pathways. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6010454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60104542018-06-25 Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke Biasiucci, A. Leeb, R. Iturrate, I. Perdikis, S. Al-Khodairy, A. Corbet, T. Schnider, A. Schmidlin, T. Zhang, H. Bassolino, M. Viceic, D. Vuadens, P. Guggisberg, A. G. Millán, J. d. R. Nat Commun Article Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are used in stroke rehabilitation to translate brain signals into intended movements of the paralyzed limb. However, the efficacy and mechanisms of BCI-based therapies remain unclear. Here we show that BCI coupled to functional electrical stimulation (FES) elicits significant, clinically relevant, and lasting motor recovery in chronic stroke survivors more effectively than sham FES. Such recovery is associated to quantitative signatures of functional neuroplasticity. BCI patients exhibit a significant functional recovery after the intervention, which remains 6–12 months after the end of therapy. Electroencephalography analysis pinpoints significant differences in favor of the BCI group, mainly consisting in an increase in functional connectivity between motor areas in the affected hemisphere. This increase is significantly correlated with functional improvement. Results illustrate how a BCI–FES therapy can drive significant functional recovery and purposeful plasticity thanks to contingent activation of body natural efferent and afferent pathways. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6010454/ /pubmed/29925890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Biasiucci, A. Leeb, R. Iturrate, I. Perdikis, S. Al-Khodairy, A. Corbet, T. Schnider, A. Schmidlin, T. Zhang, H. Bassolino, M. Viceic, D. Vuadens, P. Guggisberg, A. G. Millán, J. d. R. Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke |
title | Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke |
title_full | Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke |
title_fullStr | Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke |
title_short | Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke |
title_sort | brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biasiuccia brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke AT leebr brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke AT iturratei brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke AT perdikiss brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke AT alkhodairya brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke AT corbett brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke AT schnidera brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke AT schmidlint brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke AT zhangh brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke AT bassolinom brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke AT viceicd brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke AT vuadensp brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke AT guggisbergag brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke AT millanjdr brainactuatedfunctionalelectricalstimulationelicitslastingarmmotorrecoveryafterstroke |