Cargando…

Phylogenetic signal in tooth wear dietary niche proxies

In the absence of independent observational data, ecologists and paleoecologists use proxies for the Eltonian niches of species (i.e., the resource or dietary axes of the niche). Some dietary proxies exploit the fact that mammalian teeth experience wear during mastication, due to both tooth‐on‐tooth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fraser, Danielle, Haupt, Ryan J., Barr, W. Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29938058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4052
_version_ 1783333640272347136
author Fraser, Danielle
Haupt, Ryan J.
Barr, W. Andrew
author_facet Fraser, Danielle
Haupt, Ryan J.
Barr, W. Andrew
author_sort Fraser, Danielle
collection PubMed
description In the absence of independent observational data, ecologists and paleoecologists use proxies for the Eltonian niches of species (i.e., the resource or dietary axes of the niche). Some dietary proxies exploit the fact that mammalian teeth experience wear during mastication, due to both tooth‐on‐tooth and food‐on‐tooth interactions. The distribution and types of wear detectible at micro‐ and macroscales are highly correlated with the resource preferences of individuals and, in turn, species. Because methods that quantify the distribution of tooth wear (i.e., analytical tooth wear methods) do so by direct observation of facets and marks on the teeth of individual animals, dietary inferences derived from them are thought to be independent of the clade to which individuals belong. However, an assumption of clade or phylogenetic independence when making species‐level dietary inferences may be misleading if phylogenetic niche conservatism is widespread among mammals. Herein, we test for phylogenetic signal in data from numerous analytical tooth wear studies, incorporating macrowear (i.e., mesowear) and microwear (i.e., low‐magnification microwear and dental microwear texture analysis). Using two measures of phylogenetic signal, heritability (H (2)) and Pagel's λ, we find that analytical tooth wear data are not independent of phylogeny and failing to account for such nonindependence leads to overestimation of discriminability among species with different dietary preferences. We suggest that morphological traits inherited from ancestral clades (e.g., tooth shape) influence the ways in which the teeth wear during mastication and constrain the foods individuals of a species can effectively exploit. We do not suggest that tooth wear is simply phylogeny in disguise; the tooth wear of individuals and species likely varies within some range that is set by morphological constraints. We therefore recommend the use of phylogenetic comparative methods in studies of mammalian tooth wear, whenever possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6010706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60107062018-06-22 Phylogenetic signal in tooth wear dietary niche proxies Fraser, Danielle Haupt, Ryan J. Barr, W. Andrew Ecol Evol Original Research In the absence of independent observational data, ecologists and paleoecologists use proxies for the Eltonian niches of species (i.e., the resource or dietary axes of the niche). Some dietary proxies exploit the fact that mammalian teeth experience wear during mastication, due to both tooth‐on‐tooth and food‐on‐tooth interactions. The distribution and types of wear detectible at micro‐ and macroscales are highly correlated with the resource preferences of individuals and, in turn, species. Because methods that quantify the distribution of tooth wear (i.e., analytical tooth wear methods) do so by direct observation of facets and marks on the teeth of individual animals, dietary inferences derived from them are thought to be independent of the clade to which individuals belong. However, an assumption of clade or phylogenetic independence when making species‐level dietary inferences may be misleading if phylogenetic niche conservatism is widespread among mammals. Herein, we test for phylogenetic signal in data from numerous analytical tooth wear studies, incorporating macrowear (i.e., mesowear) and microwear (i.e., low‐magnification microwear and dental microwear texture analysis). Using two measures of phylogenetic signal, heritability (H (2)) and Pagel's λ, we find that analytical tooth wear data are not independent of phylogeny and failing to account for such nonindependence leads to overestimation of discriminability among species with different dietary preferences. We suggest that morphological traits inherited from ancestral clades (e.g., tooth shape) influence the ways in which the teeth wear during mastication and constrain the foods individuals of a species can effectively exploit. We do not suggest that tooth wear is simply phylogeny in disguise; the tooth wear of individuals and species likely varies within some range that is set by morphological constraints. We therefore recommend the use of phylogenetic comparative methods in studies of mammalian tooth wear, whenever possible. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6010706/ /pubmed/29938058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4052 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Fraser, Danielle
Haupt, Ryan J.
Barr, W. Andrew
Phylogenetic signal in tooth wear dietary niche proxies
title Phylogenetic signal in tooth wear dietary niche proxies
title_full Phylogenetic signal in tooth wear dietary niche proxies
title_fullStr Phylogenetic signal in tooth wear dietary niche proxies
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenetic signal in tooth wear dietary niche proxies
title_short Phylogenetic signal in tooth wear dietary niche proxies
title_sort phylogenetic signal in tooth wear dietary niche proxies
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29938058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4052
work_keys_str_mv AT fraserdanielle phylogeneticsignalintoothweardietarynicheproxies
AT hauptryanj phylogeneticsignalintoothweardietarynicheproxies
AT barrwandrew phylogeneticsignalintoothweardietarynicheproxies