Cargando…

Canopy bird assemblages are less influenced by habitat age and isolation than understory bird assemblages in Neotropical secondary forest

Secondary forest habitats are increasingly recognized for their potential to conserve biodiversity in the tropics. However, the development of faunal assemblages in secondary forest systems varies according to habitat quality and species‐specific traits. In this study, we predicted that the recovery...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradfer‐Lawrence, Tom, Gardner, Nick, Dent, Daisy H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29938076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4086
_version_ 1783333647403712512
author Bradfer‐Lawrence, Tom
Gardner, Nick
Dent, Daisy H.
author_facet Bradfer‐Lawrence, Tom
Gardner, Nick
Dent, Daisy H.
author_sort Bradfer‐Lawrence, Tom
collection PubMed
description Secondary forest habitats are increasingly recognized for their potential to conserve biodiversity in the tropics. However, the development of faunal assemblages in secondary forest systems varies according to habitat quality and species‐specific traits. In this study, we predicted that the recovery of bird assemblages is dependent on secondary forest age and level of isolation, the forest stratum examined, and the species’ traits of feeding guild and body mass. This study was undertaken in secondary forests in central Panama; spanning a chronosequence of 60‐, 90‐, and 120‐year‐old forests, and in neighboring old‐growth forest. To give equal attention to all forest strata, we employed a novel method that paired simultaneous surveys in canopy and understory. This survey method provides a more nuanced picture than ground‐based studies, which are biased toward understory assemblages. Bird reassembly varied according to both habitat age and isolation, although it was challenging to separate these effects, as the older sites were also more isolated than the younger sites. In combination, habitat age and isolation impacted understory birds more than canopy‐dwelling birds. Proportions of dietary guilds did not vary with habitat age, but were significantly different between strata. Body mass distributions were similar across forest ages for small‐bodied birds, but older forest supported more large‐bodied birds, probably due to control of poaching at these sites. Canopy assemblages were characterized by higher species richness, and greater variation in both dietary breadth and body mass, relative to understory assemblages. The results highlight that secondary forests may offer critical refugia for many bird species, particularly specialist canopy‐dwellers. However, understory bird species may be less able to adapt to novel and isolated habitats and should be the focus of conservation efforts encouraging bird colonization of secondary forests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6010736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60107362018-06-22 Canopy bird assemblages are less influenced by habitat age and isolation than understory bird assemblages in Neotropical secondary forest Bradfer‐Lawrence, Tom Gardner, Nick Dent, Daisy H. Ecol Evol Original Research Secondary forest habitats are increasingly recognized for their potential to conserve biodiversity in the tropics. However, the development of faunal assemblages in secondary forest systems varies according to habitat quality and species‐specific traits. In this study, we predicted that the recovery of bird assemblages is dependent on secondary forest age and level of isolation, the forest stratum examined, and the species’ traits of feeding guild and body mass. This study was undertaken in secondary forests in central Panama; spanning a chronosequence of 60‐, 90‐, and 120‐year‐old forests, and in neighboring old‐growth forest. To give equal attention to all forest strata, we employed a novel method that paired simultaneous surveys in canopy and understory. This survey method provides a more nuanced picture than ground‐based studies, which are biased toward understory assemblages. Bird reassembly varied according to both habitat age and isolation, although it was challenging to separate these effects, as the older sites were also more isolated than the younger sites. In combination, habitat age and isolation impacted understory birds more than canopy‐dwelling birds. Proportions of dietary guilds did not vary with habitat age, but were significantly different between strata. Body mass distributions were similar across forest ages for small‐bodied birds, but older forest supported more large‐bodied birds, probably due to control of poaching at these sites. Canopy assemblages were characterized by higher species richness, and greater variation in both dietary breadth and body mass, relative to understory assemblages. The results highlight that secondary forests may offer critical refugia for many bird species, particularly specialist canopy‐dwellers. However, understory bird species may be less able to adapt to novel and isolated habitats and should be the focus of conservation efforts encouraging bird colonization of secondary forests. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6010736/ /pubmed/29938076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4086 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bradfer‐Lawrence, Tom
Gardner, Nick
Dent, Daisy H.
Canopy bird assemblages are less influenced by habitat age and isolation than understory bird assemblages in Neotropical secondary forest
title Canopy bird assemblages are less influenced by habitat age and isolation than understory bird assemblages in Neotropical secondary forest
title_full Canopy bird assemblages are less influenced by habitat age and isolation than understory bird assemblages in Neotropical secondary forest
title_fullStr Canopy bird assemblages are less influenced by habitat age and isolation than understory bird assemblages in Neotropical secondary forest
title_full_unstemmed Canopy bird assemblages are less influenced by habitat age and isolation than understory bird assemblages in Neotropical secondary forest
title_short Canopy bird assemblages are less influenced by habitat age and isolation than understory bird assemblages in Neotropical secondary forest
title_sort canopy bird assemblages are less influenced by habitat age and isolation than understory bird assemblages in neotropical secondary forest
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29938076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4086
work_keys_str_mv AT bradferlawrencetom canopybirdassemblagesarelessinfluencedbyhabitatageandisolationthanunderstorybirdassemblagesinneotropicalsecondaryforest
AT gardnernick canopybirdassemblagesarelessinfluencedbyhabitatageandisolationthanunderstorybirdassemblagesinneotropicalsecondaryforest
AT dentdaisyh canopybirdassemblagesarelessinfluencedbyhabitatageandisolationthanunderstorybirdassemblagesinneotropicalsecondaryforest