Cargando…
Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study
BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive disease and a composite endpoint could be an indicator of treatment effect on disease worsening. This post-hoc analysis assessed whether indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) 110/50 μg once daily reduced the risk of clinically...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0830-z |
_version_ | 1783333796062429184 |
---|---|
author | Anzueto, Antonio R. Kostikas, Konstantinos Mezzi, Karen Shen, Steven Larbig, Michael Patalano, Francesco Fogel, Robert Banerji, Donald Wedzicha, Jadwiga A. |
author_facet | Anzueto, Antonio R. Kostikas, Konstantinos Mezzi, Karen Shen, Steven Larbig, Michael Patalano, Francesco Fogel, Robert Banerji, Donald Wedzicha, Jadwiga A. |
author_sort | Anzueto, Antonio R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive disease and a composite endpoint could be an indicator of treatment effect on disease worsening. This post-hoc analysis assessed whether indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) 110/50 μg once daily reduced the risk of clinically important deterioration (CID) versus salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) 50/500 μg twice daily in moderate-to-very severe COPD patients from the FLAME study. METHODS: CID was defined as ≥100 mL decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) or ≥ 4-unit increase in St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score or a moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation. Changes from baseline in the rate of moderate and severe exacerbations, time to first moderate-to-severe exacerbation, and change from baseline in the SGRQ score, measured after Week 12 up to Week 52, were assessed by presence of early CID (CID+) or absence of CID (CID−) at Week 12. RESULTS: IND/GLY significantly delayed the time to CID (hazard ratio [HR] (95% confidence interval [CI]), 0.72 [0.67–0.78]; P < 0.0001), and reduced the incidences of CID versus SFC. Additionally, IND/GLY delayed the time to CID in all patient subgroups. After 12 weeks until 52 weeks, CID+ patients had a significantly higher rate of moderate-to-severe exacerbations versus CID− patients (P < 0.0001); moreover, CID+ patients experienced moderate-to-severe exacerbations significantly earlier versus CID− patients (P < 0.0001). CID+ patients had a comparable change in the SGRQ total score versus CID− patients. CONCLUSIONS: IND/GLY reduced the risk of CID versus SFC. CID had a significant impact on long-term exacerbation outcomes in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD and a history of ≥1 exacerbations in the previous year. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01782326. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0830-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6011394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60113942018-07-05 Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study Anzueto, Antonio R. Kostikas, Konstantinos Mezzi, Karen Shen, Steven Larbig, Michael Patalano, Francesco Fogel, Robert Banerji, Donald Wedzicha, Jadwiga A. Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive disease and a composite endpoint could be an indicator of treatment effect on disease worsening. This post-hoc analysis assessed whether indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) 110/50 μg once daily reduced the risk of clinically important deterioration (CID) versus salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) 50/500 μg twice daily in moderate-to-very severe COPD patients from the FLAME study. METHODS: CID was defined as ≥100 mL decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) or ≥ 4-unit increase in St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score or a moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation. Changes from baseline in the rate of moderate and severe exacerbations, time to first moderate-to-severe exacerbation, and change from baseline in the SGRQ score, measured after Week 12 up to Week 52, were assessed by presence of early CID (CID+) or absence of CID (CID−) at Week 12. RESULTS: IND/GLY significantly delayed the time to CID (hazard ratio [HR] (95% confidence interval [CI]), 0.72 [0.67–0.78]; P < 0.0001), and reduced the incidences of CID versus SFC. Additionally, IND/GLY delayed the time to CID in all patient subgroups. After 12 weeks until 52 weeks, CID+ patients had a significantly higher rate of moderate-to-severe exacerbations versus CID− patients (P < 0.0001); moreover, CID+ patients experienced moderate-to-severe exacerbations significantly earlier versus CID− patients (P < 0.0001). CID+ patients had a comparable change in the SGRQ total score versus CID− patients. CONCLUSIONS: IND/GLY reduced the risk of CID versus SFC. CID had a significant impact on long-term exacerbation outcomes in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD and a history of ≥1 exacerbations in the previous year. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01782326. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0830-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6011394/ /pubmed/29925383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0830-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Anzueto, Antonio R. Kostikas, Konstantinos Mezzi, Karen Shen, Steven Larbig, Michael Patalano, Francesco Fogel, Robert Banerji, Donald Wedzicha, Jadwiga A. Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study |
title | Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study |
title_full | Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study |
title_fullStr | Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study |
title_full_unstemmed | Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study |
title_short | Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study |
title_sort | indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in copd: results from the flame study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0830-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anzuetoantonior indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy AT kostikaskonstantinos indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy AT mezzikaren indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy AT shensteven indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy AT larbigmichael indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy AT patalanofrancesco indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy AT fogelrobert indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy AT banerjidonald indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy AT wedzichajadwigaa indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy |