Cargando…

Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive disease and a composite endpoint could be an indicator of treatment effect on disease worsening. This post-hoc analysis assessed whether indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) 110/50 μg once daily reduced the risk of clinically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anzueto, Antonio R., Kostikas, Konstantinos, Mezzi, Karen, Shen, Steven, Larbig, Michael, Patalano, Francesco, Fogel, Robert, Banerji, Donald, Wedzicha, Jadwiga A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0830-z
_version_ 1783333796062429184
author Anzueto, Antonio R.
Kostikas, Konstantinos
Mezzi, Karen
Shen, Steven
Larbig, Michael
Patalano, Francesco
Fogel, Robert
Banerji, Donald
Wedzicha, Jadwiga A.
author_facet Anzueto, Antonio R.
Kostikas, Konstantinos
Mezzi, Karen
Shen, Steven
Larbig, Michael
Patalano, Francesco
Fogel, Robert
Banerji, Donald
Wedzicha, Jadwiga A.
author_sort Anzueto, Antonio R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive disease and a composite endpoint could be an indicator of treatment effect on disease worsening. This post-hoc analysis assessed whether indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) 110/50 μg once daily reduced the risk of clinically important deterioration (CID) versus salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) 50/500 μg twice daily in moderate-to-very severe COPD patients from the FLAME study. METHODS: CID was defined as ≥100 mL decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) or ≥ 4-unit increase in St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score or a moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation. Changes from baseline in the rate of moderate and severe exacerbations, time to first moderate-to-severe exacerbation, and change from baseline in the SGRQ score, measured after Week 12 up to Week 52, were assessed by presence of early CID (CID+) or absence of CID (CID−) at Week 12. RESULTS: IND/GLY significantly delayed the time to CID (hazard ratio [HR] (95% confidence interval [CI]), 0.72 [0.67–0.78]; P < 0.0001), and reduced the incidences of CID versus SFC. Additionally, IND/GLY delayed the time to CID in all patient subgroups. After 12 weeks until 52 weeks, CID+ patients had a significantly higher rate of moderate-to-severe exacerbations versus CID− patients (P < 0.0001); moreover, CID+ patients experienced moderate-to-severe exacerbations significantly earlier versus CID− patients (P < 0.0001). CID+ patients had a comparable change in the SGRQ total score versus CID− patients. CONCLUSIONS: IND/GLY reduced the risk of CID versus SFC. CID had a significant impact on long-term exacerbation outcomes in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD and a history of ≥1 exacerbations in the previous year. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01782326. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0830-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6011394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60113942018-07-05 Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study Anzueto, Antonio R. Kostikas, Konstantinos Mezzi, Karen Shen, Steven Larbig, Michael Patalano, Francesco Fogel, Robert Banerji, Donald Wedzicha, Jadwiga A. Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive disease and a composite endpoint could be an indicator of treatment effect on disease worsening. This post-hoc analysis assessed whether indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) 110/50 μg once daily reduced the risk of clinically important deterioration (CID) versus salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) 50/500 μg twice daily in moderate-to-very severe COPD patients from the FLAME study. METHODS: CID was defined as ≥100 mL decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) or ≥ 4-unit increase in St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score or a moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation. Changes from baseline in the rate of moderate and severe exacerbations, time to first moderate-to-severe exacerbation, and change from baseline in the SGRQ score, measured after Week 12 up to Week 52, were assessed by presence of early CID (CID+) or absence of CID (CID−) at Week 12. RESULTS: IND/GLY significantly delayed the time to CID (hazard ratio [HR] (95% confidence interval [CI]), 0.72 [0.67–0.78]; P < 0.0001), and reduced the incidences of CID versus SFC. Additionally, IND/GLY delayed the time to CID in all patient subgroups. After 12 weeks until 52 weeks, CID+ patients had a significantly higher rate of moderate-to-severe exacerbations versus CID− patients (P < 0.0001); moreover, CID+ patients experienced moderate-to-severe exacerbations significantly earlier versus CID− patients (P < 0.0001). CID+ patients had a comparable change in the SGRQ total score versus CID− patients. CONCLUSIONS: IND/GLY reduced the risk of CID versus SFC. CID had a significant impact on long-term exacerbation outcomes in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD and a history of ≥1 exacerbations in the previous year. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01782326. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0830-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6011394/ /pubmed/29925383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0830-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Anzueto, Antonio R.
Kostikas, Konstantinos
Mezzi, Karen
Shen, Steven
Larbig, Michael
Patalano, Francesco
Fogel, Robert
Banerji, Donald
Wedzicha, Jadwiga A.
Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study
title Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study
title_full Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study
title_fullStr Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study
title_full_unstemmed Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study
title_short Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD: results from the FLAME study
title_sort indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in the prevention of clinically important deterioration in copd: results from the flame study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0830-z
work_keys_str_mv AT anzuetoantonior indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy
AT kostikaskonstantinos indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy
AT mezzikaren indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy
AT shensteven indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy
AT larbigmichael indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy
AT patalanofrancesco indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy
AT fogelrobert indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy
AT banerjidonald indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy
AT wedzichajadwigaa indacaterolglycopyrroniumversussalmeterolfluticasoneinthepreventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationincopdresultsfromtheflamestudy