Cargando…
Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS
BACKGROUND: Health systems guidance (HSG) provides recommendations to address health systems challenges. No tools exist to inform HSG developers and users about the components of high quality HSG and to differentiate between HSG of varying quality. In response, we developed a tool to assist with the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9 |
_version_ | 1783333796770217984 |
---|---|
author | Brouwers, Melissa C. Ako-Arrey, Denis Spithoff, Karen Vukmirovic, Marija Florez, Ivan D. Lavis, John N. Cluzeau, Francoise Permanand, Govin Bosch-Capblanch, Xavier Chen, Yaolong |
author_facet | Brouwers, Melissa C. Ako-Arrey, Denis Spithoff, Karen Vukmirovic, Marija Florez, Ivan D. Lavis, John N. Cluzeau, Francoise Permanand, Govin Bosch-Capblanch, Xavier Chen, Yaolong |
author_sort | Brouwers, Melissa C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health systems guidance (HSG) provides recommendations to address health systems challenges. No tools exist to inform HSG developers and users about the components of high quality HSG and to differentiate between HSG of varying quality. In response, we developed a tool to assist with the development, reporting and appraisal of HSG – the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Health Systems (AGREE-HS). This paper reports on the validity, usability and initial measurement properties of the AGREE-HS. METHODS: To establish face validity (Study 1), stakeholders completed a survey about the AGREE-HS and provided feedback on its content and structure. Revisions to the tool were made in response. To establish usability (Study 2), the revised tool was applied to 85 HSG documents and the appraisers provided feedback about their experiences via an online survey. An initial test of the revised tool’s measurement properties, including internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, was conducted. Additional revisions to the tool were made in response. RESULTS: In Study 1, the AGREE-HS Overview, User Manual, quality item content and structure, and overall assessment questions were rated favourably. Participants indicated that the AGREE-HS would be useful, feasible to use, and that they would apply it in their context. In Study 2, participants indicated that the quality items were easy to understand and apply, and the User Manual, usefulness and usability of the tool were rated favourably. Study 2 participants also indicated intentions to use the AGREE-HS. CONCLUSIONS: The AGREE-HS comprises a User Manual, five quality items and two overall assessment questions. It is available at agreetrust.org. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6011397 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60113972018-07-05 Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS Brouwers, Melissa C. Ako-Arrey, Denis Spithoff, Karen Vukmirovic, Marija Florez, Ivan D. Lavis, John N. Cluzeau, Francoise Permanand, Govin Bosch-Capblanch, Xavier Chen, Yaolong Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Health systems guidance (HSG) provides recommendations to address health systems challenges. No tools exist to inform HSG developers and users about the components of high quality HSG and to differentiate between HSG of varying quality. In response, we developed a tool to assist with the development, reporting and appraisal of HSG – the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Health Systems (AGREE-HS). This paper reports on the validity, usability and initial measurement properties of the AGREE-HS. METHODS: To establish face validity (Study 1), stakeholders completed a survey about the AGREE-HS and provided feedback on its content and structure. Revisions to the tool were made in response. To establish usability (Study 2), the revised tool was applied to 85 HSG documents and the appraisers provided feedback about their experiences via an online survey. An initial test of the revised tool’s measurement properties, including internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, was conducted. Additional revisions to the tool were made in response. RESULTS: In Study 1, the AGREE-HS Overview, User Manual, quality item content and structure, and overall assessment questions were rated favourably. Participants indicated that the AGREE-HS would be useful, feasible to use, and that they would apply it in their context. In Study 2, participants indicated that the quality items were easy to understand and apply, and the User Manual, usefulness and usability of the tool were rated favourably. Study 2 participants also indicated intentions to use the AGREE-HS. CONCLUSIONS: The AGREE-HS comprises a User Manual, five quality items and two overall assessment questions. It is available at agreetrust.org. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6011397/ /pubmed/29925394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Brouwers, Melissa C. Ako-Arrey, Denis Spithoff, Karen Vukmirovic, Marija Florez, Ivan D. Lavis, John N. Cluzeau, Francoise Permanand, Govin Bosch-Capblanch, Xavier Chen, Yaolong Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS |
title | Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS |
title_full | Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS |
title_fullStr | Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS |
title_short | Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS |
title_sort | validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the agree-hs |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brouwersmelissac validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT akoarreydenis validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT spithoffkaren validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT vukmirovicmarija validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT florezivand validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT lavisjohnn validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT cluzeaufrancoise validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT permanandgovin validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT boschcapblanchxavier validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT chenyaolong validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs |