Cargando…

Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study

BACKGROUND: Increased aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease. Optimal measurement is highly beneficial for the detection of atherosclerosis and the management of patients at risk. Thus, it was our purpose to selectively measure aortic stiffness using a novel imaging m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harloff, Andreas, Mirzaee, Hanieh, Lodemann, Thomas, Hagenlocher, Paul, Wehrum, Thomas, Stuplich, Judith, Hennemuth, Anja, Hennig, Jürgen, Grundmann, Sebastian, Vach, Werner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0461-z
_version_ 1783333805063405568
author Harloff, Andreas
Mirzaee, Hanieh
Lodemann, Thomas
Hagenlocher, Paul
Wehrum, Thomas
Stuplich, Judith
Hennemuth, Anja
Hennig, Jürgen
Grundmann, Sebastian
Vach, Werner
author_facet Harloff, Andreas
Mirzaee, Hanieh
Lodemann, Thomas
Hagenlocher, Paul
Wehrum, Thomas
Stuplich, Judith
Hennemuth, Anja
Hennig, Jürgen
Grundmann, Sebastian
Vach, Werner
author_sort Harloff, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increased aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease. Optimal measurement is highly beneficial for the detection of atherosclerosis and the management of patients at risk. Thus, it was our purpose to selectively measure aortic stiffness using a novel imaging method and to provide reference values from a population-based study. METHODS: One hundred twenty six inhabitants of Freiburg, Germany, between 20 and 80 years prospectively underwent 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) of the thoracic aorta. 4D flow CMR (spatial/temporal resolution 2mm(3)/20ms) was executed to calculate aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) in m/s using dedicated software. In addition, we calculated distensibility coefficients (DC) using 2D CINE CMR imaging of the ascending (AAo) and descending aorta (DAo). Segmental aortic diameter and thickness of aortic plaques were determined by 3D T1 weighted CMR (spatial resolution 1mm(3)). RESULTS: PWV increased from 4.93 ± 0.54 m/s in 20–30 year-old to 8.06 ± 1.03 m/s in 70–80 year-old subjects. PWV was significantly lower in women compared to men (p < 0.0001). Increased blood pressure (systolic r = 0.36, p < 0.0001; diastolic r = 0.33, p = 0.0001; mean arterial pressure r = 0.37, p < 0.0001) correlated with PWV after adjustment for age and gender. Finally, PWV increased with increasing diameter of the aorta (ascending aorta r = 0.20, p = 0.026; aortic arch r = 0.24, p = 0.009; descending aorta r = 0.26, p = 0.004). Correlation of PWV and DC of the AAo and DAo or the mean of both was high (r = 0.69, r = 0.68, r = 0.73; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: 4D flow CMR was successfully applied to calculate aortic PWV and thus aortic stiffness. Findings showed a high correlation with distensibility coefficients representing local compliance of the aorta. Our novel method and reference data for PWV may provide a reliable biomarker for the identification of patients with underlying cardiovascular disease and optimal guidance of future treatment in studies or clinical routine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6011486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60114862018-07-05 Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study Harloff, Andreas Mirzaee, Hanieh Lodemann, Thomas Hagenlocher, Paul Wehrum, Thomas Stuplich, Judith Hennemuth, Anja Hennig, Jürgen Grundmann, Sebastian Vach, Werner J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Increased aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease. Optimal measurement is highly beneficial for the detection of atherosclerosis and the management of patients at risk. Thus, it was our purpose to selectively measure aortic stiffness using a novel imaging method and to provide reference values from a population-based study. METHODS: One hundred twenty six inhabitants of Freiburg, Germany, between 20 and 80 years prospectively underwent 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) of the thoracic aorta. 4D flow CMR (spatial/temporal resolution 2mm(3)/20ms) was executed to calculate aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) in m/s using dedicated software. In addition, we calculated distensibility coefficients (DC) using 2D CINE CMR imaging of the ascending (AAo) and descending aorta (DAo). Segmental aortic diameter and thickness of aortic plaques were determined by 3D T1 weighted CMR (spatial resolution 1mm(3)). RESULTS: PWV increased from 4.93 ± 0.54 m/s in 20–30 year-old to 8.06 ± 1.03 m/s in 70–80 year-old subjects. PWV was significantly lower in women compared to men (p < 0.0001). Increased blood pressure (systolic r = 0.36, p < 0.0001; diastolic r = 0.33, p = 0.0001; mean arterial pressure r = 0.37, p < 0.0001) correlated with PWV after adjustment for age and gender. Finally, PWV increased with increasing diameter of the aorta (ascending aorta r = 0.20, p = 0.026; aortic arch r = 0.24, p = 0.009; descending aorta r = 0.26, p = 0.004). Correlation of PWV and DC of the AAo and DAo or the mean of both was high (r = 0.69, r = 0.68, r = 0.73; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: 4D flow CMR was successfully applied to calculate aortic PWV and thus aortic stiffness. Findings showed a high correlation with distensibility coefficients representing local compliance of the aorta. Our novel method and reference data for PWV may provide a reliable biomarker for the identification of patients with underlying cardiovascular disease and optimal guidance of future treatment in studies or clinical routine. BioMed Central 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6011486/ /pubmed/29925388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0461-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Harloff, Andreas
Mirzaee, Hanieh
Lodemann, Thomas
Hagenlocher, Paul
Wehrum, Thomas
Stuplich, Judith
Hennemuth, Anja
Hennig, Jürgen
Grundmann, Sebastian
Vach, Werner
Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study
title Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study
title_full Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study
title_fullStr Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study
title_short Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study
title_sort determination of aortic stiffness using 4d flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0461-z
work_keys_str_mv AT harloffandreas determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT mirzaeehanieh determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT lodemannthomas determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT hagenlocherpaul determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT wehrumthomas determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT stuplichjudith determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT hennemuthanja determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT hennigjurgen determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT grundmannsebastian determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT vachwerner determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy