Cargando…
Comparison of the effects of photodynamic therapy, intravitreal ranibizumab and combination for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy under 1 + PRN regimen
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) is still under debate. Little knowledge is known about the treatment effect of “1+pro re nata(PRN)” treatment regimen for PCV. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of photodynamic therapy (PDT), intravitreal r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0801-7 |
_version_ | 1783333807279046656 |
---|---|
author | Lai, Kunbei Li, Ying Zhou, Lijun Zhong, Xiaojin Huang, Chuangxin Xu, Fabao Lu, Lin Ge, Jian Jin, Chenjin |
author_facet | Lai, Kunbei Li, Ying Zhou, Lijun Zhong, Xiaojin Huang, Chuangxin Xu, Fabao Lu, Lin Ge, Jian Jin, Chenjin |
author_sort | Lai, Kunbei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) is still under debate. Little knowledge is known about the treatment effect of “1+pro re nata(PRN)” treatment regimen for PCV. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of photodynamic therapy (PDT), intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) and combination therapy under the “1 + PRN” treatment regimen for PCV. METHODS: Fifty-seven eyes of 57 patients completed the 12 months’ follow-up in this prospective study. The patients in the PDT arm(n = 23), ranibizumab arm(n = 18), or combination arm(n = 16) underwent a session of PDT, IVR or combination of both at baseline followed by additional IVR as needed. Mean change of logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity (VA), central foveal thickness (CFT) and the regression rate of polyps were evaluated. Cost-benefit analysis was also performed. RESULTS: At Month 12, the mean logMAR VA improved from 0.90 ± 0.52 to 0.75 ± 0.57 in the PDT group (P < 0.05), from 0.96 ± 0.58 to 0.77 ± 0.41 in the IVR group (P < 0.05), and from 0.94 ± 0.55 to 0.72 ± 0.44 in the combination group (P < 0.05), respectively. The CFT decreased from 478.04 ± 156.70 μm, 527.5 ± 195.90 μm, and 522.63 ± 288.40 μm at the baseline to 366.43 ± 148.28 μm, 373.17 ± 134.88 μm and 328.44 ± 103.25 in the PDT group (P < 0.05), IVR group (P < 0.01), and the combination group (P < 0.05), respectively. However, no statistical difference was found between groups (P > 0.05). PDT treatment (60.87%) was superior to the IVR therapy (22.22%) in achieving complete regression of polyps (P < 0.05). Cost-benefit analysis showed that IVR treatment cost the least money for improving per 0.1logMAR units and the combination therapy demanded the least money for reducing per 100 μm of CFT. CONCLUSIONS: PDT, IVR and the combination therapy have similar efficacy in the VA improvement as well as the reduction of CFT under the “1 + PRN” treatment regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials NCT03459144. Registered retrospectively on March 2, 2018. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6011514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60115142018-07-05 Comparison of the effects of photodynamic therapy, intravitreal ranibizumab and combination for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy under 1 + PRN regimen Lai, Kunbei Li, Ying Zhou, Lijun Zhong, Xiaojin Huang, Chuangxin Xu, Fabao Lu, Lin Ge, Jian Jin, Chenjin BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) is still under debate. Little knowledge is known about the treatment effect of “1+pro re nata(PRN)” treatment regimen for PCV. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of photodynamic therapy (PDT), intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) and combination therapy under the “1 + PRN” treatment regimen for PCV. METHODS: Fifty-seven eyes of 57 patients completed the 12 months’ follow-up in this prospective study. The patients in the PDT arm(n = 23), ranibizumab arm(n = 18), or combination arm(n = 16) underwent a session of PDT, IVR or combination of both at baseline followed by additional IVR as needed. Mean change of logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity (VA), central foveal thickness (CFT) and the regression rate of polyps were evaluated. Cost-benefit analysis was also performed. RESULTS: At Month 12, the mean logMAR VA improved from 0.90 ± 0.52 to 0.75 ± 0.57 in the PDT group (P < 0.05), from 0.96 ± 0.58 to 0.77 ± 0.41 in the IVR group (P < 0.05), and from 0.94 ± 0.55 to 0.72 ± 0.44 in the combination group (P < 0.05), respectively. The CFT decreased from 478.04 ± 156.70 μm, 527.5 ± 195.90 μm, and 522.63 ± 288.40 μm at the baseline to 366.43 ± 148.28 μm, 373.17 ± 134.88 μm and 328.44 ± 103.25 in the PDT group (P < 0.05), IVR group (P < 0.01), and the combination group (P < 0.05), respectively. However, no statistical difference was found between groups (P > 0.05). PDT treatment (60.87%) was superior to the IVR therapy (22.22%) in achieving complete regression of polyps (P < 0.05). Cost-benefit analysis showed that IVR treatment cost the least money for improving per 0.1logMAR units and the combination therapy demanded the least money for reducing per 100 μm of CFT. CONCLUSIONS: PDT, IVR and the combination therapy have similar efficacy in the VA improvement as well as the reduction of CFT under the “1 + PRN” treatment regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials NCT03459144. Registered retrospectively on March 2, 2018. BioMed Central 2018-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6011514/ /pubmed/29925341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0801-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lai, Kunbei Li, Ying Zhou, Lijun Zhong, Xiaojin Huang, Chuangxin Xu, Fabao Lu, Lin Ge, Jian Jin, Chenjin Comparison of the effects of photodynamic therapy, intravitreal ranibizumab and combination for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy under 1 + PRN regimen |
title | Comparison of the effects of photodynamic therapy, intravitreal ranibizumab and combination for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy under 1 + PRN regimen |
title_full | Comparison of the effects of photodynamic therapy, intravitreal ranibizumab and combination for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy under 1 + PRN regimen |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the effects of photodynamic therapy, intravitreal ranibizumab and combination for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy under 1 + PRN regimen |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the effects of photodynamic therapy, intravitreal ranibizumab and combination for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy under 1 + PRN regimen |
title_short | Comparison of the effects of photodynamic therapy, intravitreal ranibizumab and combination for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy under 1 + PRN regimen |
title_sort | comparison of the effects of photodynamic therapy, intravitreal ranibizumab and combination for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy under 1 + prn regimen |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0801-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laikunbei comparisonoftheeffectsofphotodynamictherapyintravitrealranibizumabandcombinationforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathyunder1prnregimen AT liying comparisonoftheeffectsofphotodynamictherapyintravitrealranibizumabandcombinationforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathyunder1prnregimen AT zhoulijun comparisonoftheeffectsofphotodynamictherapyintravitrealranibizumabandcombinationforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathyunder1prnregimen AT zhongxiaojin comparisonoftheeffectsofphotodynamictherapyintravitrealranibizumabandcombinationforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathyunder1prnregimen AT huangchuangxin comparisonoftheeffectsofphotodynamictherapyintravitrealranibizumabandcombinationforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathyunder1prnregimen AT xufabao comparisonoftheeffectsofphotodynamictherapyintravitrealranibizumabandcombinationforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathyunder1prnregimen AT lulin comparisonoftheeffectsofphotodynamictherapyintravitrealranibizumabandcombinationforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathyunder1prnregimen AT gejian comparisonoftheeffectsofphotodynamictherapyintravitrealranibizumabandcombinationforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathyunder1prnregimen AT jinchenjin comparisonoftheeffectsofphotodynamictherapyintravitrealranibizumabandcombinationforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathyunder1prnregimen |