Cargando…

Sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections

BACKGROUND: Sex differences are important epidemiological factors that impact in the frequency and severity of infectious diseases. A clear sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections has been reported in both humans and animal models. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms involved in this gender bia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vázquez-Martínez, Edgar Ricardo, García-Gómez, Elizabeth, Camacho-Arroyo, Ignacio, González-Pedrajo, Bertha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-018-0187-5
_version_ 1783333808300359680
author Vázquez-Martínez, Edgar Ricardo
García-Gómez, Elizabeth
Camacho-Arroyo, Ignacio
González-Pedrajo, Bertha
author_facet Vázquez-Martínez, Edgar Ricardo
García-Gómez, Elizabeth
Camacho-Arroyo, Ignacio
González-Pedrajo, Bertha
author_sort Vázquez-Martínez, Edgar Ricardo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sex differences are important epidemiological factors that impact in the frequency and severity of infectious diseases. A clear sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections has been reported in both humans and animal models. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms involved in this gender bias are just starting to be elucidated. In the present article, we aim to review the available data in the literature that report bacterial infections presenting a clear sexual dimorphism, without considering behavioral and social factors. MAIN BODY: The sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections has been mainly attributed to the differential levels of sex hormones between males and females, as well as to genetic factors. In general, males are more susceptible to gastrointestinal and respiratory bacterial diseases and sepsis, while females are more susceptible to genitourinary tract bacterial infections. However, these incidences depend on the population evaluated, animal model and the bacterial species. Female protection against bacterial infections and the associated complications is assumed to be due to the pro-inflammatory effect of estradiol, while male susceptibility to those infections is associated with the testosterone-mediated immune suppression, probably via their specific receptors. Recent studies indicate that the protective effect of estradiol depends on the estrogen receptor subtype and the specific tissue compartment involved in the bacterial insult, suggesting that tissue-specific expression of particular sex steroid receptors contributes to the susceptibility to bacterial infections. Furthermore, this gender bias also depends on the effects of sex hormones on specific bacterial species. Finally, since a large number of genes related to immune functions are located on the X chromosome, X-linked mosaicism confers a highly polymorphic gene expression program that allows women to respond with a more expanded immune repertoire as compared with men. CONCLUSION: Notwithstanding there is increasing evidence that confirms the sexual dimorphism in certain bacterial infections and the molecular mechanisms associated, further studies are required to clarify conflicting data and to determine the role of specific hormone receptors involved in the gender bias of bacterial infections, as well as their potential as therapeutic targets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6011518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60115182018-07-05 Sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections Vázquez-Martínez, Edgar Ricardo García-Gómez, Elizabeth Camacho-Arroyo, Ignacio González-Pedrajo, Bertha Biol Sex Differ Review BACKGROUND: Sex differences are important epidemiological factors that impact in the frequency and severity of infectious diseases. A clear sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections has been reported in both humans and animal models. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms involved in this gender bias are just starting to be elucidated. In the present article, we aim to review the available data in the literature that report bacterial infections presenting a clear sexual dimorphism, without considering behavioral and social factors. MAIN BODY: The sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections has been mainly attributed to the differential levels of sex hormones between males and females, as well as to genetic factors. In general, males are more susceptible to gastrointestinal and respiratory bacterial diseases and sepsis, while females are more susceptible to genitourinary tract bacterial infections. However, these incidences depend on the population evaluated, animal model and the bacterial species. Female protection against bacterial infections and the associated complications is assumed to be due to the pro-inflammatory effect of estradiol, while male susceptibility to those infections is associated with the testosterone-mediated immune suppression, probably via their specific receptors. Recent studies indicate that the protective effect of estradiol depends on the estrogen receptor subtype and the specific tissue compartment involved in the bacterial insult, suggesting that tissue-specific expression of particular sex steroid receptors contributes to the susceptibility to bacterial infections. Furthermore, this gender bias also depends on the effects of sex hormones on specific bacterial species. Finally, since a large number of genes related to immune functions are located on the X chromosome, X-linked mosaicism confers a highly polymorphic gene expression program that allows women to respond with a more expanded immune repertoire as compared with men. CONCLUSION: Notwithstanding there is increasing evidence that confirms the sexual dimorphism in certain bacterial infections and the molecular mechanisms associated, further studies are required to clarify conflicting data and to determine the role of specific hormone receptors involved in the gender bias of bacterial infections, as well as their potential as therapeutic targets. BioMed Central 2018-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6011518/ /pubmed/29925409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-018-0187-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Vázquez-Martínez, Edgar Ricardo
García-Gómez, Elizabeth
Camacho-Arroyo, Ignacio
González-Pedrajo, Bertha
Sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections
title Sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections
title_full Sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections
title_fullStr Sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections
title_full_unstemmed Sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections
title_short Sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections
title_sort sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-018-0187-5
work_keys_str_mv AT vazquezmartinezedgarricardo sexualdimorphisminbacterialinfections
AT garciagomezelizabeth sexualdimorphisminbacterialinfections
AT camachoarroyoignacio sexualdimorphisminbacterialinfections
AT gonzalezpedrajobertha sexualdimorphisminbacterialinfections