Cargando…

Assessing the relationship between pupil diameter and visuocortical activity

Visuocortical activity and pupil diameter both increase in tasks involving memory, attention, and physiological arousal. Thus, the question arises whether pupil dilation prompts a subsequent increase in visuocortical activity. In this study, we investigated the extent to which changes in visuocortic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thigpen, Nina N., Bradley, Margaret M., Keil, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6012182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30029218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/18.6.7
_version_ 1783333891243769856
author Thigpen, Nina N.
Bradley, Margaret M.
Keil, Andreas
author_facet Thigpen, Nina N.
Bradley, Margaret M.
Keil, Andreas
author_sort Thigpen, Nina N.
collection PubMed
description Visuocortical activity and pupil diameter both increase in tasks involving memory, attention, and physiological arousal. Thus, the question arises whether pupil dilation prompts a subsequent increase in visuocortical activity. In this study, we investigated the extent to which changes in visuocortical activity relate to changes in pupil diameter. The amplitude of the sustained visuocortical response to a flickering stimulus (i.e., steady-state visually evoked potential [ssVEP] power) was examined in 39 participants while pupil diameter was measured. To generalize across stimulus conditions, Gabor stimuli varied in brightness and ssVEP driving frequency. As expected, brighter stimuli prompted pupil constriction and larger ssVEP power. To determine whether momentary fluctuations in pupil size contribute to the ssVEP amplitude under conditions of constant luminance and frequency, the single-trial means from each measure were correlated and the shape of the pupil-diameter waveform related to the ssVEP amplitude time course, both within and between participants. Under constant conditions, changes in pupil diameter were not related to changes in ssVEP amplitude, at any luminance level or driving frequency. Findings suggest that pupil dilation does not systematically prompt subsequent changes in visuocortical activity, and thus is not a sufficient cause of visuocortical modulation in cognitive or affective tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6012182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60121822018-06-22 Assessing the relationship between pupil diameter and visuocortical activity Thigpen, Nina N. Bradley, Margaret M. Keil, Andreas J Vis Article Visuocortical activity and pupil diameter both increase in tasks involving memory, attention, and physiological arousal. Thus, the question arises whether pupil dilation prompts a subsequent increase in visuocortical activity. In this study, we investigated the extent to which changes in visuocortical activity relate to changes in pupil diameter. The amplitude of the sustained visuocortical response to a flickering stimulus (i.e., steady-state visually evoked potential [ssVEP] power) was examined in 39 participants while pupil diameter was measured. To generalize across stimulus conditions, Gabor stimuli varied in brightness and ssVEP driving frequency. As expected, brighter stimuli prompted pupil constriction and larger ssVEP power. To determine whether momentary fluctuations in pupil size contribute to the ssVEP amplitude under conditions of constant luminance and frequency, the single-trial means from each measure were correlated and the shape of the pupil-diameter waveform related to the ssVEP amplitude time course, both within and between participants. Under constant conditions, changes in pupil diameter were not related to changes in ssVEP amplitude, at any luminance level or driving frequency. Findings suggest that pupil dilation does not systematically prompt subsequent changes in visuocortical activity, and thus is not a sufficient cause of visuocortical modulation in cognitive or affective tasks. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6012182/ /pubmed/30029218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/18.6.7 Text en Copyright 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Thigpen, Nina N.
Bradley, Margaret M.
Keil, Andreas
Assessing the relationship between pupil diameter and visuocortical activity
title Assessing the relationship between pupil diameter and visuocortical activity
title_full Assessing the relationship between pupil diameter and visuocortical activity
title_fullStr Assessing the relationship between pupil diameter and visuocortical activity
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the relationship between pupil diameter and visuocortical activity
title_short Assessing the relationship between pupil diameter and visuocortical activity
title_sort assessing the relationship between pupil diameter and visuocortical activity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6012182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30029218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/18.6.7
work_keys_str_mv AT thigpenninan assessingtherelationshipbetweenpupildiameterandvisuocorticalactivity
AT bradleymargaretm assessingtherelationshipbetweenpupildiameterandvisuocorticalactivity
AT keilandreas assessingtherelationshipbetweenpupildiameterandvisuocorticalactivity