Cargando…

Anti-filarial immunity blocks parasite development and plays a protective role

Lymphatic filariasis is a complex parasitic disease having a spectrum of clinical parameters which are critical in deciding the severity of the pathogenesis. Individuals residing in the endemic areas are categorized into different clinical groups such as: EC (endemic controls-free of disease and inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahoo, Prakash Kumar, Panda, Santosh K., Satapathy, Ashok Kumar, Pati, Sanghamitra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29927974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199090
_version_ 1783333951751847936
author Sahoo, Prakash Kumar
Panda, Santosh K.
Satapathy, Ashok Kumar
Pati, Sanghamitra
author_facet Sahoo, Prakash Kumar
Panda, Santosh K.
Satapathy, Ashok Kumar
Pati, Sanghamitra
author_sort Sahoo, Prakash Kumar
collection PubMed
description Lymphatic filariasis is a complex parasitic disease having a spectrum of clinical parameters which are critical in deciding the severity of the pathogenesis. Individuals residing in the endemic areas are categorized into different clinical groups such as: EC (endemic controls-free of disease and infection), AS (asymptomatic carriers- free of disease but carries both antigens and microfilaria (Mf) in circulation), CR (cryptic-free of disease and Mf but having circulatory antigen) and CH (chronic-having manifestations of elephantiasis and hydrocele). The immune response to the parasitic infection is well studied, whereas the protective mechanism explaining the fate of antigenemia and filaremia between AS and CR group remains unexplained. Increased anti-Mf antibodies have been implicated for Mf clearance in experimental infection models whereas its role in clinical filariasis is not known. Here, we followed up two groups of 24 and 33 CR cases for 18 and 36 months respectively and analyzed both the clinical parameters and the anti-filarial antibody response. The humoral response to both whole filarial antigen and Mf antigens as well as recombinant active parasitic antigens was significantly higher in CR cases than AS individuals, whereas the clinical parameters remain unchanged. This study made insights into the protective immune mechanism responsible for the clearance of Mf from circulation in CR individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6013016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60130162018-07-06 Anti-filarial immunity blocks parasite development and plays a protective role Sahoo, Prakash Kumar Panda, Santosh K. Satapathy, Ashok Kumar Pati, Sanghamitra PLoS One Research Article Lymphatic filariasis is a complex parasitic disease having a spectrum of clinical parameters which are critical in deciding the severity of the pathogenesis. Individuals residing in the endemic areas are categorized into different clinical groups such as: EC (endemic controls-free of disease and infection), AS (asymptomatic carriers- free of disease but carries both antigens and microfilaria (Mf) in circulation), CR (cryptic-free of disease and Mf but having circulatory antigen) and CH (chronic-having manifestations of elephantiasis and hydrocele). The immune response to the parasitic infection is well studied, whereas the protective mechanism explaining the fate of antigenemia and filaremia between AS and CR group remains unexplained. Increased anti-Mf antibodies have been implicated for Mf clearance in experimental infection models whereas its role in clinical filariasis is not known. Here, we followed up two groups of 24 and 33 CR cases for 18 and 36 months respectively and analyzed both the clinical parameters and the anti-filarial antibody response. The humoral response to both whole filarial antigen and Mf antigens as well as recombinant active parasitic antigens was significantly higher in CR cases than AS individuals, whereas the clinical parameters remain unchanged. This study made insights into the protective immune mechanism responsible for the clearance of Mf from circulation in CR individuals. Public Library of Science 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6013016/ /pubmed/29927974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199090 Text en © 2018 Sahoo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sahoo, Prakash Kumar
Panda, Santosh K.
Satapathy, Ashok Kumar
Pati, Sanghamitra
Anti-filarial immunity blocks parasite development and plays a protective role
title Anti-filarial immunity blocks parasite development and plays a protective role
title_full Anti-filarial immunity blocks parasite development and plays a protective role
title_fullStr Anti-filarial immunity blocks parasite development and plays a protective role
title_full_unstemmed Anti-filarial immunity blocks parasite development and plays a protective role
title_short Anti-filarial immunity blocks parasite development and plays a protective role
title_sort anti-filarial immunity blocks parasite development and plays a protective role
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29927974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199090
work_keys_str_mv AT sahooprakashkumar antifilarialimmunityblocksparasitedevelopmentandplaysaprotectiverole
AT pandasantoshk antifilarialimmunityblocksparasitedevelopmentandplaysaprotectiverole
AT satapathyashokkumar antifilarialimmunityblocksparasitedevelopmentandplaysaprotectiverole
AT patisanghamitra antifilarialimmunityblocksparasitedevelopmentandplaysaprotectiverole