Cargando…
Comparison of dry and wet deposition of particulate matter in near-surface waters during summer
Atmospheric particulate matter (PM) deposition which involves both dry and wet processes is an important means of controlling air pollution. To investigate the characteristics of dry and wet deposition in wetlands, PM concentrations and meteorological conditions were monitored during summer at heigh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29927989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199241 |
Sumario: | Atmospheric particulate matter (PM) deposition which involves both dry and wet processes is an important means of controlling air pollution. To investigate the characteristics of dry and wet deposition in wetlands, PM concentrations and meteorological conditions were monitored during summer at heights of 1.5 m, 6 m and 10 m above ground level at Cuihu Wetland (Beijing, China) in order to assess the efficiency of PM2.5 (particles with an aerodynamic size of <2.5 μm) and PM10 (particles with an aerodynamic size of <10 μm) removal. The results showed: Daily concentrations of PM, dry deposition velocities and fluxes changed with the same variation trend. The daily average deposition velocity for PM10 (3.19 ± 1.18 cm·s(–1)) was almost 10 times that of PM2.5 (0.32 ± 0.33 cm·s(–1)). For PM2.5, the following dry deposition fluxes were recorded: 10 m (0.170 ± 0.463 μg·m(–2)·s(–1)) > 6 m (0.007 ± 0.003 μg·m(–2)·s(–1)) > 1.5 m (0.005 ± 0.002 μg·m(–2)·s(–1)). And the following deposition fluxes for PM10 were recorded: 10 m (2.163 ± 2.941 μg·m(–2)·s(–1)) > 1.5 m (1.565 ± 0.872 μg·m(–2)·s(–1)) > 6 m (0.987 ± 0.595 μg·m(–2)·s(–1)). In the case of wet deposition, the relative deposition fluxes for PM2.5 and PM10 were 1.5 m > 10 m > 6 m, i.e. there was very little difference between the fluxes for PM2.5 (0.688 ± 0.069 μg·m(–2)·s(–1)) and for PM10 (0.904 ± 0.103 μg·m(–2)·s(–1)). It was also noted that rainfall intensity and PM diameter influenced wet deposition efficiency. Dry deposition (63%) was more tilted towards removing PM10 than was the case for wet deposition (37%). In terms of PM2.5 removal, wet deposition (92%) was found to be more efficient. |
---|