Cargando…

Comparison of Uphold(TM) Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Hysterectomy is the empirical treatment for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) without robust evidence to prove its efficacy. Uphold transvaginal mesh (TVM) system is an innovated device with smaller area, superior anterior/apical support with single incision to treat POP. The prospective cohort stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ker, Chin-Ru, Lin, Kun-Ling, Loo, Zi-Xi, Juan, Yung-Shun, Long, Cheng-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27765-8
_version_ 1783334009817792512
author Ker, Chin-Ru
Lin, Kun-Ling
Loo, Zi-Xi
Juan, Yung-Shun
Long, Cheng-Yu
author_facet Ker, Chin-Ru
Lin, Kun-Ling
Loo, Zi-Xi
Juan, Yung-Shun
Long, Cheng-Yu
author_sort Ker, Chin-Ru
collection PubMed
description Hysterectomy is the empirical treatment for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) without robust evidence to prove its efficacy. Uphold transvaginal mesh (TVM) system is an innovated device with smaller area, superior anterior/apical support with single incision to treat POP. The prospective cohort study aims to evaluate Uphold TVM’s performance with or without concomitant hysterectomy. Inclusion criteria specify patients suffering from stage 2 or more anterior/apical prolapse without previous hysterectomy. Exclusion criteria specify those with contraindications to uterine preservation, such as leiomyomas, adenomyosis, endometrial hyperplasia, abnormal uterine bleeding, postmenopausal bleeding, cervical dysplasia, receiving tamoxifen treatment, family history of gynecology cancer, or colon cancer and incapability to be routinely followed. Thirty patients are recruited in the hysterectomy group and 66 patients in the hysteropexy group. The results demonstrate that patients with Uphold mesh only experience longer vaginal length, shorter operation duration, less blood loss and less post-operation pain. The performance in anatomical correction, lower urinary tract symptoms improvement, de novo dyspareunia, urodynamic study parameters and mesh extrusion rates are comparable with or without uterus preservation. The information is useful in pre-operation counseling, when the patient can make an educated choice whether or not to receive concomitant hysterectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6013434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60134342018-06-27 Comparison of Uphold(TM) Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Ker, Chin-Ru Lin, Kun-Ling Loo, Zi-Xi Juan, Yung-Shun Long, Cheng-Yu Sci Rep Article Hysterectomy is the empirical treatment for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) without robust evidence to prove its efficacy. Uphold transvaginal mesh (TVM) system is an innovated device with smaller area, superior anterior/apical support with single incision to treat POP. The prospective cohort study aims to evaluate Uphold TVM’s performance with or without concomitant hysterectomy. Inclusion criteria specify patients suffering from stage 2 or more anterior/apical prolapse without previous hysterectomy. Exclusion criteria specify those with contraindications to uterine preservation, such as leiomyomas, adenomyosis, endometrial hyperplasia, abnormal uterine bleeding, postmenopausal bleeding, cervical dysplasia, receiving tamoxifen treatment, family history of gynecology cancer, or colon cancer and incapability to be routinely followed. Thirty patients are recruited in the hysterectomy group and 66 patients in the hysteropexy group. The results demonstrate that patients with Uphold mesh only experience longer vaginal length, shorter operation duration, less blood loss and less post-operation pain. The performance in anatomical correction, lower urinary tract symptoms improvement, de novo dyspareunia, urodynamic study parameters and mesh extrusion rates are comparable with or without uterus preservation. The information is useful in pre-operation counseling, when the patient can make an educated choice whether or not to receive concomitant hysterectomy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6013434/ /pubmed/29930249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27765-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ker, Chin-Ru
Lin, Kun-Ling
Loo, Zi-Xi
Juan, Yung-Shun
Long, Cheng-Yu
Comparison of Uphold(TM) Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title Comparison of Uphold(TM) Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_full Comparison of Uphold(TM) Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_fullStr Comparison of Uphold(TM) Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Uphold(TM) Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_short Comparison of Uphold(TM) Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_sort comparison of uphold(tm) vaginal mesh procedure with hysterectomy or uterine preservation for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27765-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kerchinru comparisonofupholdtmvaginalmeshprocedurewithhysterectomyoruterinepreservationforthetreatmentofpelvicorganprolapse
AT linkunling comparisonofupholdtmvaginalmeshprocedurewithhysterectomyoruterinepreservationforthetreatmentofpelvicorganprolapse
AT loozixi comparisonofupholdtmvaginalmeshprocedurewithhysterectomyoruterinepreservationforthetreatmentofpelvicorganprolapse
AT juanyungshun comparisonofupholdtmvaginalmeshprocedurewithhysterectomyoruterinepreservationforthetreatmentofpelvicorganprolapse
AT longchengyu comparisonofupholdtmvaginalmeshprocedurewithhysterectomyoruterinepreservationforthetreatmentofpelvicorganprolapse