Cargando…
Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system
Biomarkers that represent the structural and functional integrity of the motor system enable us to better assess motor outcome post-stroke. The degree of overlap between the stroke lesion and corticospinal tract (CST Injury) is a measure of the structural integrity of the motor system, whereas the l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27541-8 |
_version_ | 1783334016444792832 |
---|---|
author | Lam, Timothy K. Binns, Malcolm A. Honjo, Kie Dawson, Deirdre R. Ross, Bernhard Stuss, Donald T. Black, Sandra E. Chen, J. Jean Fujioka, Takako Chen, Joyce L. |
author_facet | Lam, Timothy K. Binns, Malcolm A. Honjo, Kie Dawson, Deirdre R. Ross, Bernhard Stuss, Donald T. Black, Sandra E. Chen, J. Jean Fujioka, Takako Chen, Joyce L. |
author_sort | Lam, Timothy K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biomarkers that represent the structural and functional integrity of the motor system enable us to better assess motor outcome post-stroke. The degree of overlap between the stroke lesion and corticospinal tract (CST Injury) is a measure of the structural integrity of the motor system, whereas the left-to-right motor cortex resting state connectivity (LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity) is a measure of its functional integrity. CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity each individually correlate with motor outcome post-stroke, but less is understood about the relationship between these biomarkers. Thus, this study investigates the relationship between CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity, individually and together, with motor outcome. Twenty-seven participants with upper limb motor deficits post-stroke completed motor assessments and underwent MRI at one time point. CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity were derived from T1-weighted and resting state functional MRI scans, respectively. We performed hierarchical multiple regression analyses to determine the contribution of each biomarker in explaining motor outcome. The interaction between CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity does not significantly contribute to the variability in motor outcome. However, inclusion of both CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity explains more variability in motor outcome, than either alone. We suggest both biomarkers provide distinct information about an individual’s motor outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6013462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60134622018-06-27 Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system Lam, Timothy K. Binns, Malcolm A. Honjo, Kie Dawson, Deirdre R. Ross, Bernhard Stuss, Donald T. Black, Sandra E. Chen, J. Jean Fujioka, Takako Chen, Joyce L. Sci Rep Article Biomarkers that represent the structural and functional integrity of the motor system enable us to better assess motor outcome post-stroke. The degree of overlap between the stroke lesion and corticospinal tract (CST Injury) is a measure of the structural integrity of the motor system, whereas the left-to-right motor cortex resting state connectivity (LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity) is a measure of its functional integrity. CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity each individually correlate with motor outcome post-stroke, but less is understood about the relationship between these biomarkers. Thus, this study investigates the relationship between CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity, individually and together, with motor outcome. Twenty-seven participants with upper limb motor deficits post-stroke completed motor assessments and underwent MRI at one time point. CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity were derived from T1-weighted and resting state functional MRI scans, respectively. We performed hierarchical multiple regression analyses to determine the contribution of each biomarker in explaining motor outcome. The interaction between CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity does not significantly contribute to the variability in motor outcome. However, inclusion of both CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity explains more variability in motor outcome, than either alone. We suggest both biomarkers provide distinct information about an individual’s motor outcome. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6013462/ /pubmed/29930399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27541-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Lam, Timothy K. Binns, Malcolm A. Honjo, Kie Dawson, Deirdre R. Ross, Bernhard Stuss, Donald T. Black, Sandra E. Chen, J. Jean Fujioka, Takako Chen, Joyce L. Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system |
title | Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system |
title_full | Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system |
title_fullStr | Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system |
title_full_unstemmed | Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system |
title_short | Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system |
title_sort | variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27541-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lamtimothyk variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem AT binnsmalcolma variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem AT honjokie variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem AT dawsondeirdrer variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem AT rossbernhard variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem AT stussdonaldt variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem AT blacksandrae variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem AT chenjjean variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem AT fujiokatakako variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem AT chenjoycel variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem |