Cargando…

Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system

Biomarkers that represent the structural and functional integrity of the motor system enable us to better assess motor outcome post-stroke. The degree of overlap between the stroke lesion and corticospinal tract (CST Injury) is a measure of the structural integrity of the motor system, whereas the l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lam, Timothy K., Binns, Malcolm A., Honjo, Kie, Dawson, Deirdre R., Ross, Bernhard, Stuss, Donald T., Black, Sandra E., Chen, J. Jean, Fujioka, Takako, Chen, Joyce L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27541-8
_version_ 1783334016444792832
author Lam, Timothy K.
Binns, Malcolm A.
Honjo, Kie
Dawson, Deirdre R.
Ross, Bernhard
Stuss, Donald T.
Black, Sandra E.
Chen, J. Jean
Fujioka, Takako
Chen, Joyce L.
author_facet Lam, Timothy K.
Binns, Malcolm A.
Honjo, Kie
Dawson, Deirdre R.
Ross, Bernhard
Stuss, Donald T.
Black, Sandra E.
Chen, J. Jean
Fujioka, Takako
Chen, Joyce L.
author_sort Lam, Timothy K.
collection PubMed
description Biomarkers that represent the structural and functional integrity of the motor system enable us to better assess motor outcome post-stroke. The degree of overlap between the stroke lesion and corticospinal tract (CST Injury) is a measure of the structural integrity of the motor system, whereas the left-to-right motor cortex resting state connectivity (LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity) is a measure of its functional integrity. CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity each individually correlate with motor outcome post-stroke, but less is understood about the relationship between these biomarkers. Thus, this study investigates the relationship between CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity, individually and together, with motor outcome. Twenty-seven participants with upper limb motor deficits post-stroke completed motor assessments and underwent MRI at one time point. CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity were derived from T1-weighted and resting state functional MRI scans, respectively. We performed hierarchical multiple regression analyses to determine the contribution of each biomarker in explaining motor outcome. The interaction between CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity does not significantly contribute to the variability in motor outcome. However, inclusion of both CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity explains more variability in motor outcome, than either alone. We suggest both biomarkers provide distinct information about an individual’s motor outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6013462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60134622018-06-27 Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system Lam, Timothy K. Binns, Malcolm A. Honjo, Kie Dawson, Deirdre R. Ross, Bernhard Stuss, Donald T. Black, Sandra E. Chen, J. Jean Fujioka, Takako Chen, Joyce L. Sci Rep Article Biomarkers that represent the structural and functional integrity of the motor system enable us to better assess motor outcome post-stroke. The degree of overlap between the stroke lesion and corticospinal tract (CST Injury) is a measure of the structural integrity of the motor system, whereas the left-to-right motor cortex resting state connectivity (LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity) is a measure of its functional integrity. CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity each individually correlate with motor outcome post-stroke, but less is understood about the relationship between these biomarkers. Thus, this study investigates the relationship between CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity, individually and together, with motor outcome. Twenty-seven participants with upper limb motor deficits post-stroke completed motor assessments and underwent MRI at one time point. CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity were derived from T1-weighted and resting state functional MRI scans, respectively. We performed hierarchical multiple regression analyses to determine the contribution of each biomarker in explaining motor outcome. The interaction between CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity does not significantly contribute to the variability in motor outcome. However, inclusion of both CST Injury and LM1-RM1 rs-connectivity explains more variability in motor outcome, than either alone. We suggest both biomarkers provide distinct information about an individual’s motor outcome. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6013462/ /pubmed/29930399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27541-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Lam, Timothy K.
Binns, Malcolm A.
Honjo, Kie
Dawson, Deirdre R.
Ross, Bernhard
Stuss, Donald T.
Black, Sandra E.
Chen, J. Jean
Fujioka, Takako
Chen, Joyce L.
Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system
title Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system
title_full Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system
title_fullStr Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system
title_full_unstemmed Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system
title_short Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system
title_sort variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27541-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lamtimothyk variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem
AT binnsmalcolma variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem
AT honjokie variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem
AT dawsondeirdrer variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem
AT rossbernhard variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem
AT stussdonaldt variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem
AT blacksandrae variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem
AT chenjjean variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem
AT fujiokatakako variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem
AT chenjoycel variabilityinstrokemotoroutcomeisexplainedbystructuralandfunctionalintegrityofthemotorsystem