Cargando…

Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: Closure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery markedly reduces the risk for small bowel obstruction due to internal hernia. However, this procedure is associated with an increased risk for early small bowel obstruction and pulmonary complication. The purpose of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stenberg, Erik, Näslund, Ingmar, Szabo, Eva, Ottosson, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29858618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-018-1684-z
_version_ 1783334027595350016
author Stenberg, Erik
Näslund, Ingmar
Szabo, Eva
Ottosson, Johan
author_facet Stenberg, Erik
Näslund, Ingmar
Szabo, Eva
Ottosson, Johan
author_sort Stenberg, Erik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Closure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery markedly reduces the risk for small bowel obstruction due to internal hernia. However, this procedure is associated with an increased risk for early small bowel obstruction and pulmonary complication. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether the learning curve and subsequent adaptions made to the technique have had an effect on the risk for complications. METHODS: The results of patients operated with a primary laparoscopic gastric bypass procedure, including closure of the mesenteric defects with sutures, during a period soon after introduction (January 1, 2010–December 31, 2011) were compared to those of patients operated recently (January 1, 2014–June 30, 2017). Data were retrieved from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg). The main outcome was reoperation for small bowel obstruction within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 5444 patients were included in the first group (period 1), and 1908 in the second group (period 2). Thirty-day follow-up rates were 97.1 and 97.5% respectively. The risk for early (within 30 days) small bowel obstruction was lower in period 2 than in period 1 (13/1860, 0.7% vs. 67/5285, 1.3%, OR 0.55 (0.30–0.99), p = 0.045). The risk for pulmonary complication was also reduced (5/1860, 0.3%, vs. 41/5285, 0.8%, OR 0.34 (0.14–0.87), p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Closure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery can be performed safely and should be viewed as a routine part of that operation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6013510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60135102018-06-25 Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass Stenberg, Erik Näslund, Ingmar Szabo, Eva Ottosson, Johan Langenbecks Arch Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Closure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery markedly reduces the risk for small bowel obstruction due to internal hernia. However, this procedure is associated with an increased risk for early small bowel obstruction and pulmonary complication. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether the learning curve and subsequent adaptions made to the technique have had an effect on the risk for complications. METHODS: The results of patients operated with a primary laparoscopic gastric bypass procedure, including closure of the mesenteric defects with sutures, during a period soon after introduction (January 1, 2010–December 31, 2011) were compared to those of patients operated recently (January 1, 2014–June 30, 2017). Data were retrieved from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg). The main outcome was reoperation for small bowel obstruction within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 5444 patients were included in the first group (period 1), and 1908 in the second group (period 2). Thirty-day follow-up rates were 97.1 and 97.5% respectively. The risk for early (within 30 days) small bowel obstruction was lower in period 2 than in period 1 (13/1860, 0.7% vs. 67/5285, 1.3%, OR 0.55 (0.30–0.99), p = 0.045). The risk for pulmonary complication was also reduced (5/1860, 0.3%, vs. 41/5285, 0.8%, OR 0.34 (0.14–0.87), p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Closure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery can be performed safely and should be viewed as a routine part of that operation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-06-01 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6013510/ /pubmed/29858618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-018-1684-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Stenberg, Erik
Näslund, Ingmar
Szabo, Eva
Ottosson, Johan
Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass
title Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass
title_full Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass
title_fullStr Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass
title_full_unstemmed Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass
title_short Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass
title_sort impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29858618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-018-1684-z
work_keys_str_mv AT stenbergerik impactofmesentericdefectclosuretechniqueoncomplicationsaftergastricbypass
AT naslundingmar impactofmesentericdefectclosuretechniqueoncomplicationsaftergastricbypass
AT szaboeva impactofmesentericdefectclosuretechniqueoncomplicationsaftergastricbypass
AT ottossonjohan impactofmesentericdefectclosuretechniqueoncomplicationsaftergastricbypass