Cargando…
Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass
BACKGROUND: Closure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery markedly reduces the risk for small bowel obstruction due to internal hernia. However, this procedure is associated with an increased risk for early small bowel obstruction and pulmonary complication. The purpose of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29858618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-018-1684-z |
_version_ | 1783334027595350016 |
---|---|
author | Stenberg, Erik Näslund, Ingmar Szabo, Eva Ottosson, Johan |
author_facet | Stenberg, Erik Näslund, Ingmar Szabo, Eva Ottosson, Johan |
author_sort | Stenberg, Erik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Closure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery markedly reduces the risk for small bowel obstruction due to internal hernia. However, this procedure is associated with an increased risk for early small bowel obstruction and pulmonary complication. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether the learning curve and subsequent adaptions made to the technique have had an effect on the risk for complications. METHODS: The results of patients operated with a primary laparoscopic gastric bypass procedure, including closure of the mesenteric defects with sutures, during a period soon after introduction (January 1, 2010–December 31, 2011) were compared to those of patients operated recently (January 1, 2014–June 30, 2017). Data were retrieved from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg). The main outcome was reoperation for small bowel obstruction within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 5444 patients were included in the first group (period 1), and 1908 in the second group (period 2). Thirty-day follow-up rates were 97.1 and 97.5% respectively. The risk for early (within 30 days) small bowel obstruction was lower in period 2 than in period 1 (13/1860, 0.7% vs. 67/5285, 1.3%, OR 0.55 (0.30–0.99), p = 0.045). The risk for pulmonary complication was also reduced (5/1860, 0.3%, vs. 41/5285, 0.8%, OR 0.34 (0.14–0.87), p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Closure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery can be performed safely and should be viewed as a routine part of that operation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6013510 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60135102018-06-25 Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass Stenberg, Erik Näslund, Ingmar Szabo, Eva Ottosson, Johan Langenbecks Arch Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Closure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery markedly reduces the risk for small bowel obstruction due to internal hernia. However, this procedure is associated with an increased risk for early small bowel obstruction and pulmonary complication. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether the learning curve and subsequent adaptions made to the technique have had an effect on the risk for complications. METHODS: The results of patients operated with a primary laparoscopic gastric bypass procedure, including closure of the mesenteric defects with sutures, during a period soon after introduction (January 1, 2010–December 31, 2011) were compared to those of patients operated recently (January 1, 2014–June 30, 2017). Data were retrieved from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg). The main outcome was reoperation for small bowel obstruction within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 5444 patients were included in the first group (period 1), and 1908 in the second group (period 2). Thirty-day follow-up rates were 97.1 and 97.5% respectively. The risk for early (within 30 days) small bowel obstruction was lower in period 2 than in period 1 (13/1860, 0.7% vs. 67/5285, 1.3%, OR 0.55 (0.30–0.99), p = 0.045). The risk for pulmonary complication was also reduced (5/1860, 0.3%, vs. 41/5285, 0.8%, OR 0.34 (0.14–0.87), p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Closure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery can be performed safely and should be viewed as a routine part of that operation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-06-01 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6013510/ /pubmed/29858618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-018-1684-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Stenberg, Erik Näslund, Ingmar Szabo, Eva Ottosson, Johan Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass |
title | Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass |
title_full | Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass |
title_fullStr | Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass |
title_short | Impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass |
title_sort | impact of mesenteric defect closure technique on complications after gastric bypass |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29858618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-018-1684-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stenbergerik impactofmesentericdefectclosuretechniqueoncomplicationsaftergastricbypass AT naslundingmar impactofmesentericdefectclosuretechniqueoncomplicationsaftergastricbypass AT szaboeva impactofmesentericdefectclosuretechniqueoncomplicationsaftergastricbypass AT ottossonjohan impactofmesentericdefectclosuretechniqueoncomplicationsaftergastricbypass |