Cargando…

Electrostatic binding of polyanions using self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) ligand displays – structure–activity effects on DNA/heparin binding

This paper reports that modifying the ligands in self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) displays has an impact on apparent binding selectivity towards two nanoscale biological polyanions – heparin and DNA. For the nanostructures assayed here, spermidine ligands are optimal for heparin binding but spermi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fechner, Loryn E., Albanyan, Buthaina, Vieira, Vânia M. P., Laurini, Erik, Posocco, Paola, Pricl, Sabrina, Smith, David K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5sc04801j
_version_ 1783334085964333056
author Fechner, Loryn E.
Albanyan, Buthaina
Vieira, Vânia M. P.
Laurini, Erik
Posocco, Paola
Pricl, Sabrina
Smith, David K.
author_facet Fechner, Loryn E.
Albanyan, Buthaina
Vieira, Vânia M. P.
Laurini, Erik
Posocco, Paola
Pricl, Sabrina
Smith, David K.
author_sort Fechner, Loryn E.
collection PubMed
description This paper reports that modifying the ligands in self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) displays has an impact on apparent binding selectivity towards two nanoscale biological polyanions – heparin and DNA. For the nanostructures assayed here, spermidine ligands are optimal for heparin binding but spermine ligands are preferred for DNA. Probing subtle differences in such nanoscale binding interfaces is a significant challenge, and as such, several experimental binding assays – competition assays and isothermal calorimetry – are employed to confirm differences in affinity and provide thermodynamic insights. Given the dynamic nature and hierarchical binding processes involved in SAMul systems, we employed multiscale modelling to propose reasons for the origins of polyanion selectivity differences. The modelling results, when expressed in thermodynamic terms and compared with the experimental data, suggest that DNA is a shape-persistent polyanion, and selectivity originates only from ligand preferences, whereas heparin is more flexible and adaptive, and as such, actively reinforces ligand preferences. As such, this study suggests that inherent differences between polyanions may underpin subtle binding selectivity differences, and that even simple electrostatic interfaces such as these can have a degree of tunability, which has implications for biological control and regulation on the nanoscale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6013769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60137692018-08-28 Electrostatic binding of polyanions using self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) ligand displays – structure–activity effects on DNA/heparin binding Fechner, Loryn E. Albanyan, Buthaina Vieira, Vânia M. P. Laurini, Erik Posocco, Paola Pricl, Sabrina Smith, David K. Chem Sci Chemistry This paper reports that modifying the ligands in self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) displays has an impact on apparent binding selectivity towards two nanoscale biological polyanions – heparin and DNA. For the nanostructures assayed here, spermidine ligands are optimal for heparin binding but spermine ligands are preferred for DNA. Probing subtle differences in such nanoscale binding interfaces is a significant challenge, and as such, several experimental binding assays – competition assays and isothermal calorimetry – are employed to confirm differences in affinity and provide thermodynamic insights. Given the dynamic nature and hierarchical binding processes involved in SAMul systems, we employed multiscale modelling to propose reasons for the origins of polyanion selectivity differences. The modelling results, when expressed in thermodynamic terms and compared with the experimental data, suggest that DNA is a shape-persistent polyanion, and selectivity originates only from ligand preferences, whereas heparin is more flexible and adaptive, and as such, actively reinforces ligand preferences. As such, this study suggests that inherent differences between polyanions may underpin subtle binding selectivity differences, and that even simple electrostatic interfaces such as these can have a degree of tunability, which has implications for biological control and regulation on the nanoscale. Royal Society of Chemistry 2016-07-01 2016-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6013769/ /pubmed/30155113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5sc04801j Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is freely available. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence (CC BY-NC 3.0)
spellingShingle Chemistry
Fechner, Loryn E.
Albanyan, Buthaina
Vieira, Vânia M. P.
Laurini, Erik
Posocco, Paola
Pricl, Sabrina
Smith, David K.
Electrostatic binding of polyanions using self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) ligand displays – structure–activity effects on DNA/heparin binding
title Electrostatic binding of polyanions using self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) ligand displays – structure–activity effects on DNA/heparin binding
title_full Electrostatic binding of polyanions using self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) ligand displays – structure–activity effects on DNA/heparin binding
title_fullStr Electrostatic binding of polyanions using self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) ligand displays – structure–activity effects on DNA/heparin binding
title_full_unstemmed Electrostatic binding of polyanions using self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) ligand displays – structure–activity effects on DNA/heparin binding
title_short Electrostatic binding of polyanions using self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) ligand displays – structure–activity effects on DNA/heparin binding
title_sort electrostatic binding of polyanions using self-assembled multivalent (samul) ligand displays – structure–activity effects on dna/heparin binding
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5sc04801j
work_keys_str_mv AT fechnerloryne electrostaticbindingofpolyanionsusingselfassembledmultivalentsamulliganddisplaysstructureactivityeffectsondnaheparinbinding
AT albanyanbuthaina electrostaticbindingofpolyanionsusingselfassembledmultivalentsamulliganddisplaysstructureactivityeffectsondnaheparinbinding
AT vieiravaniamp electrostaticbindingofpolyanionsusingselfassembledmultivalentsamulliganddisplaysstructureactivityeffectsondnaheparinbinding
AT laurinierik electrostaticbindingofpolyanionsusingselfassembledmultivalentsamulliganddisplaysstructureactivityeffectsondnaheparinbinding
AT posoccopaola electrostaticbindingofpolyanionsusingselfassembledmultivalentsamulliganddisplaysstructureactivityeffectsondnaheparinbinding
AT priclsabrina electrostaticbindingofpolyanionsusingselfassembledmultivalentsamulliganddisplaysstructureactivityeffectsondnaheparinbinding
AT smithdavidk electrostaticbindingofpolyanionsusingselfassembledmultivalentsamulliganddisplaysstructureactivityeffectsondnaheparinbinding