Cargando…
The creation and characterisation of a National Compound Collection: the Royal Society of Chemistry pilot
We present a summary of the National Compound Collection (NCC) pilot; which harvested chemical structure data from 746 publicly-available PhD theses to create an enhanced database of diverse and interesting (largely organic) molecular entities. The database comprised ∼75 000 structure entries, of wh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal Society of Chemistry
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6sc00264a |
_version_ | 1783334096368304128 |
---|---|
author | Andrews, David M. Broad, Laura M. Edwards, Paul J. Fox, David N. A. Gallagher, Timothy Garland, Stephen L. Kidd, Richard Sweeney, Joseph B. |
author_facet | Andrews, David M. Broad, Laura M. Edwards, Paul J. Fox, David N. A. Gallagher, Timothy Garland, Stephen L. Kidd, Richard Sweeney, Joseph B. |
author_sort | Andrews, David M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present a summary of the National Compound Collection (NCC) pilot; which harvested chemical structure data from 746 publicly-available PhD theses to create an enhanced database of diverse and interesting (largely organic) molecular entities. The database comprised ∼75 000 structure entries, of which 70% were new to ChemSpider at the time of upload. The dataset was evaluated for structural uniqueness by twelve external drug discovery groups from the pharmaceutical, biotech, academic and not-for-profit sectors. These partners generated data reported here comparing the NCC pilot with their in-house compound collections. The proportion of NCC structures considered to be useful for drug discovery ranged from 5–80% depending on the strictness of the filters used; most interestingly from a drug discovery standpoint ∼13k NCC compounds (18% of the NCC) passed the filters and were of good diversity. These compounds are quite different from those that are already present in the screening collections but not so different that they are no longer considered to be drug-like. In general, the drug discovery teams would consider these compounds to be high value molecules for inclusion in their screening collections. This pilot addressed the potential value of unpublished data and explored the practicalities of large-scale data extraction, to inform both retrospective and prospective extraction of chemical data from theses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6013800 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Royal Society of Chemistry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60138002018-08-28 The creation and characterisation of a National Compound Collection: the Royal Society of Chemistry pilot Andrews, David M. Broad, Laura M. Edwards, Paul J. Fox, David N. A. Gallagher, Timothy Garland, Stephen L. Kidd, Richard Sweeney, Joseph B. Chem Sci Chemistry We present a summary of the National Compound Collection (NCC) pilot; which harvested chemical structure data from 746 publicly-available PhD theses to create an enhanced database of diverse and interesting (largely organic) molecular entities. The database comprised ∼75 000 structure entries, of which 70% were new to ChemSpider at the time of upload. The dataset was evaluated for structural uniqueness by twelve external drug discovery groups from the pharmaceutical, biotech, academic and not-for-profit sectors. These partners generated data reported here comparing the NCC pilot with their in-house compound collections. The proportion of NCC structures considered to be useful for drug discovery ranged from 5–80% depending on the strictness of the filters used; most interestingly from a drug discovery standpoint ∼13k NCC compounds (18% of the NCC) passed the filters and were of good diversity. These compounds are quite different from those that are already present in the screening collections but not so different that they are no longer considered to be drug-like. In general, the drug discovery teams would consider these compounds to be high value molecules for inclusion in their screening collections. This pilot addressed the potential value of unpublished data and explored the practicalities of large-scale data extraction, to inform both retrospective and prospective extraction of chemical data from theses. Royal Society of Chemistry 2016-06-01 2016-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6013800/ /pubmed/30155031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6sc00264a Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is freely available. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence (CC BY 3.0) |
spellingShingle | Chemistry Andrews, David M. Broad, Laura M. Edwards, Paul J. Fox, David N. A. Gallagher, Timothy Garland, Stephen L. Kidd, Richard Sweeney, Joseph B. The creation and characterisation of a National Compound Collection: the Royal Society of Chemistry pilot |
title | The creation and characterisation of a National Compound Collection: the Royal Society of Chemistry pilot
|
title_full | The creation and characterisation of a National Compound Collection: the Royal Society of Chemistry pilot
|
title_fullStr | The creation and characterisation of a National Compound Collection: the Royal Society of Chemistry pilot
|
title_full_unstemmed | The creation and characterisation of a National Compound Collection: the Royal Society of Chemistry pilot
|
title_short | The creation and characterisation of a National Compound Collection: the Royal Society of Chemistry pilot
|
title_sort | creation and characterisation of a national compound collection: the royal society of chemistry pilot |
topic | Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6sc00264a |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andrewsdavidm thecreationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT broadlauram thecreationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT edwardspaulj thecreationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT foxdavidna thecreationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT gallaghertimothy thecreationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT garlandstephenl thecreationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT kiddrichard thecreationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT sweeneyjosephb thecreationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT andrewsdavidm creationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT broadlauram creationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT edwardspaulj creationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT foxdavidna creationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT gallaghertimothy creationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT garlandstephenl creationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT kiddrichard creationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot AT sweeneyjosephb creationandcharacterisationofanationalcompoundcollectiontheroyalsocietyofchemistrypilot |