Cargando…
Comparison of glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase status by fluorescent spot test and rapid diagnostic test in Lao PDR and Cambodia
BACKGROUND: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the most common enzymopathy worldwide. Primaquine is the only licensed drug that effectively removes Plasmodium vivax hypnozoites from the human host and prevents relapse. While well tolerated by most recipients, primaquine can cause...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2390-6 |
_version_ | 1783334107037564928 |
---|---|
author | Henriques, Gisela Phommasone, Koukeo Tripura, Rupam Peto, Thomas J. Raut, Shristi Snethlage, Coco Sambo, Im Sanann, Nou Nguon, Chea Adhikari, Bipin Pongvongsa, Tiengkham Imwong, Mallika von Seidlein, Lorenz Day, Nicholas P. White, Nicholas J. Dondorp, Arjen M. Newton, Paul Ley, Benedikt Mayxay, Mayfong |
author_facet | Henriques, Gisela Phommasone, Koukeo Tripura, Rupam Peto, Thomas J. Raut, Shristi Snethlage, Coco Sambo, Im Sanann, Nou Nguon, Chea Adhikari, Bipin Pongvongsa, Tiengkham Imwong, Mallika von Seidlein, Lorenz Day, Nicholas P. White, Nicholas J. Dondorp, Arjen M. Newton, Paul Ley, Benedikt Mayxay, Mayfong |
author_sort | Henriques, Gisela |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the most common enzymopathy worldwide. Primaquine is the only licensed drug that effectively removes Plasmodium vivax hypnozoites from the human host and prevents relapse. While well tolerated by most recipients, primaquine can cause haemolysis in G6PD deficient individuals and is, therefore, underused. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) could permit ascertainment of G6PD status outside of laboratory settings and hence safe treatment in remote areas. The performance of the fluorescent spot test (Trinity, Ireland; FST) and a G6PD RDT (Carestart, USA) against spectrophotometry were assessed. METHODS: Participants were enrolled during cross-sectional surveys in Laos and by purposive sampling in Cambodia. FST and RDT were performed during village surveys and 3 mL of venous blood was collected for subsequent G6PD measurement by spectrophotometry. RESULTS: A total of 757 participants were enrolled in Laos and 505 in Cambodia. FST and RDT performed best at 30% cut-off activity and performed significantly better in Laos than in Cambodia. When defining intermediate results as G6PD deficient, the FST had a sensitivity of 100% (95%CI 90–100) and specificity of 90% (95%CI 87.7–92.2) in Laos and sensitivity of 98% (94.1–99.6) and specificity of 71% (95%CI 66–76) in Cambodia (p < 0.001). The RDT had sensitivity and specificity of 100% (95%CI 90–100) and 99% (95%CI 97–99) in Laos and sensitivity and specificity of 91% (86–96) and 93% (90–95) in Cambodia (p < 0.001). The RDT performed significantly better (all p < 0.05) than the FST when intermediate FST results were defined as G6PD deficient. CONCLUSION: The interpretation of RDT results requires some training but is a good alternative to the FST. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01872702; 06/27/2013; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01872702 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6013858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60138582018-07-05 Comparison of glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase status by fluorescent spot test and rapid diagnostic test in Lao PDR and Cambodia Henriques, Gisela Phommasone, Koukeo Tripura, Rupam Peto, Thomas J. Raut, Shristi Snethlage, Coco Sambo, Im Sanann, Nou Nguon, Chea Adhikari, Bipin Pongvongsa, Tiengkham Imwong, Mallika von Seidlein, Lorenz Day, Nicholas P. White, Nicholas J. Dondorp, Arjen M. Newton, Paul Ley, Benedikt Mayxay, Mayfong Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the most common enzymopathy worldwide. Primaquine is the only licensed drug that effectively removes Plasmodium vivax hypnozoites from the human host and prevents relapse. While well tolerated by most recipients, primaquine can cause haemolysis in G6PD deficient individuals and is, therefore, underused. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) could permit ascertainment of G6PD status outside of laboratory settings and hence safe treatment in remote areas. The performance of the fluorescent spot test (Trinity, Ireland; FST) and a G6PD RDT (Carestart, USA) against spectrophotometry were assessed. METHODS: Participants were enrolled during cross-sectional surveys in Laos and by purposive sampling in Cambodia. FST and RDT were performed during village surveys and 3 mL of venous blood was collected for subsequent G6PD measurement by spectrophotometry. RESULTS: A total of 757 participants were enrolled in Laos and 505 in Cambodia. FST and RDT performed best at 30% cut-off activity and performed significantly better in Laos than in Cambodia. When defining intermediate results as G6PD deficient, the FST had a sensitivity of 100% (95%CI 90–100) and specificity of 90% (95%CI 87.7–92.2) in Laos and sensitivity of 98% (94.1–99.6) and specificity of 71% (95%CI 66–76) in Cambodia (p < 0.001). The RDT had sensitivity and specificity of 100% (95%CI 90–100) and 99% (95%CI 97–99) in Laos and sensitivity and specificity of 91% (86–96) and 93% (90–95) in Cambodia (p < 0.001). The RDT performed significantly better (all p < 0.05) than the FST when intermediate FST results were defined as G6PD deficient. CONCLUSION: The interpretation of RDT results requires some training but is a good alternative to the FST. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01872702; 06/27/2013; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01872702 BioMed Central 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6013858/ /pubmed/29929514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2390-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Henriques, Gisela Phommasone, Koukeo Tripura, Rupam Peto, Thomas J. Raut, Shristi Snethlage, Coco Sambo, Im Sanann, Nou Nguon, Chea Adhikari, Bipin Pongvongsa, Tiengkham Imwong, Mallika von Seidlein, Lorenz Day, Nicholas P. White, Nicholas J. Dondorp, Arjen M. Newton, Paul Ley, Benedikt Mayxay, Mayfong Comparison of glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase status by fluorescent spot test and rapid diagnostic test in Lao PDR and Cambodia |
title | Comparison of glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase status by fluorescent spot test and rapid diagnostic test in Lao PDR and Cambodia |
title_full | Comparison of glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase status by fluorescent spot test and rapid diagnostic test in Lao PDR and Cambodia |
title_fullStr | Comparison of glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase status by fluorescent spot test and rapid diagnostic test in Lao PDR and Cambodia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase status by fluorescent spot test and rapid diagnostic test in Lao PDR and Cambodia |
title_short | Comparison of glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase status by fluorescent spot test and rapid diagnostic test in Lao PDR and Cambodia |
title_sort | comparison of glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase status by fluorescent spot test and rapid diagnostic test in lao pdr and cambodia |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2390-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT henriquesgisela comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT phommasonekoukeo comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT tripurarupam comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT petothomasj comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT rautshristi comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT snethlagecoco comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT samboim comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT sanannnou comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT nguonchea comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT adhikaribipin comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT pongvongsatiengkham comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT imwongmallika comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT vonseidleinlorenz comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT daynicholasp comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT whitenicholasj comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT dondorparjenm comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT newtonpaul comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT leybenedikt comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia AT mayxaymayfong comparisonofglucose6phosphatedehydrogenasestatusbyfluorescentspottestandrapiddiagnostictestinlaopdrandcambodia |