Cargando…

Postoperative tight glycemic control significantly reduces postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The benefit results of postoperative tight glycemic control (TGC) were controversial and there was a lack of well-powered studies that support current guideline recommendations. METHODS: The EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched utilizing the key words “Blood...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yuan-yuan, Hu, Shuang-fei, Ying, Hui-min, Chen, Long, Li, Hui-li, Tian, Fang, Zhou, Zhen-feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-018-0268-9
_version_ 1783334116000792576
author Wang, Yuan-yuan
Hu, Shuang-fei
Ying, Hui-min
Chen, Long
Li, Hui-li
Tian, Fang
Zhou, Zhen-feng
author_facet Wang, Yuan-yuan
Hu, Shuang-fei
Ying, Hui-min
Chen, Long
Li, Hui-li
Tian, Fang
Zhou, Zhen-feng
author_sort Wang, Yuan-yuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The benefit results of postoperative tight glycemic control (TGC) were controversial and there was a lack of well-powered studies that support current guideline recommendations. METHODS: The EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched utilizing the key words “Blood Glucose”, “insulin” and “Postoperative Period” to retrieve all randomized controlled trials evaluating the benefits of postoperative TGC as compared to conventional glycemic control (CGC) in patients undergoing surgery. RESULTS: Fifteen studies involving 5053 patients were identified. As compared to CGC group, there were lower risks of total postoperative infection (9.4% vs. 15.8%; RR 0.586, 95% CI 0.504 to 0.680, p <  0.001) and wound infection (4.6% vs. 7.2%; RR 0.620, 95% CI 0.422 to 0.910, p = 0.015) in TGC group. TGC also showed a lower risk of postoperative short-term mortality (3.8% vs. 5.4%; RR 0.692, 95% CI 0.527 to 0.909, p = 0.008), but sensitivity analyses showed that the result was mainly influenced by one study. The patients in the TGC group experienced a significant higher rate of postoperative hypoglycemia (22.3% vs. 11.0%; RR 3.145, 95% CI 1.928 to 5.131, p <  0.001) and severe hypoglycemia (2.8% vs. 0.7%; RR 3.821, 95% CI 1.796 to 8.127, p <  0.001) as compared to CGC group. TGC showed less length of ICU stay (SMD, − 0.428 days; 95% CI, − 0.833 to − 0.022 days; p = 0.039). However, TGC showed a neutral effect on neurological dysfunction (1.1% vs. 2.4%; RR 0.499, 95% CI 0.219 to 1.137, p = 0.098), acute renal failure (3.3% vs. 5.4%, RR 0.610, 95% CI 0.359 to 1.038, p = 0.068), duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.201) and length of hospitalization (p = 0.082). CONCLUSIONS: TGC immediately after surgery significantly reduces total postoperative infection rates and short-term mortality. However, it might limit conclusion regarding the efficacy of TGC for short-term mortality in sensitivity analyses. The patients in the TGC group experienced a significant higher rate of postoperative hypoglycemia. This study may suggest that TGC should be administrated under close glucose monitoring in patients undergoing surgery, especially in those with high postoperative infection risk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12902-018-0268-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6013895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60138952018-07-05 Postoperative tight glycemic control significantly reduces postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis Wang, Yuan-yuan Hu, Shuang-fei Ying, Hui-min Chen, Long Li, Hui-li Tian, Fang Zhou, Zhen-feng BMC Endocr Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The benefit results of postoperative tight glycemic control (TGC) were controversial and there was a lack of well-powered studies that support current guideline recommendations. METHODS: The EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched utilizing the key words “Blood Glucose”, “insulin” and “Postoperative Period” to retrieve all randomized controlled trials evaluating the benefits of postoperative TGC as compared to conventional glycemic control (CGC) in patients undergoing surgery. RESULTS: Fifteen studies involving 5053 patients were identified. As compared to CGC group, there were lower risks of total postoperative infection (9.4% vs. 15.8%; RR 0.586, 95% CI 0.504 to 0.680, p <  0.001) and wound infection (4.6% vs. 7.2%; RR 0.620, 95% CI 0.422 to 0.910, p = 0.015) in TGC group. TGC also showed a lower risk of postoperative short-term mortality (3.8% vs. 5.4%; RR 0.692, 95% CI 0.527 to 0.909, p = 0.008), but sensitivity analyses showed that the result was mainly influenced by one study. The patients in the TGC group experienced a significant higher rate of postoperative hypoglycemia (22.3% vs. 11.0%; RR 3.145, 95% CI 1.928 to 5.131, p <  0.001) and severe hypoglycemia (2.8% vs. 0.7%; RR 3.821, 95% CI 1.796 to 8.127, p <  0.001) as compared to CGC group. TGC showed less length of ICU stay (SMD, − 0.428 days; 95% CI, − 0.833 to − 0.022 days; p = 0.039). However, TGC showed a neutral effect on neurological dysfunction (1.1% vs. 2.4%; RR 0.499, 95% CI 0.219 to 1.137, p = 0.098), acute renal failure (3.3% vs. 5.4%, RR 0.610, 95% CI 0.359 to 1.038, p = 0.068), duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.201) and length of hospitalization (p = 0.082). CONCLUSIONS: TGC immediately after surgery significantly reduces total postoperative infection rates and short-term mortality. However, it might limit conclusion regarding the efficacy of TGC for short-term mortality in sensitivity analyses. The patients in the TGC group experienced a significant higher rate of postoperative hypoglycemia. This study may suggest that TGC should be administrated under close glucose monitoring in patients undergoing surgery, especially in those with high postoperative infection risk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12902-018-0268-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6013895/ /pubmed/29929558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-018-0268-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Yuan-yuan
Hu, Shuang-fei
Ying, Hui-min
Chen, Long
Li, Hui-li
Tian, Fang
Zhou, Zhen-feng
Postoperative tight glycemic control significantly reduces postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis
title Postoperative tight glycemic control significantly reduces postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis
title_full Postoperative tight glycemic control significantly reduces postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Postoperative tight glycemic control significantly reduces postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative tight glycemic control significantly reduces postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis
title_short Postoperative tight glycemic control significantly reduces postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis
title_sort postoperative tight glycemic control significantly reduces postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-018-0268-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyuanyuan postoperativetightglycemiccontrolsignificantlyreducespostoperativeinfectionratesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryametaanalysis
AT hushuangfei postoperativetightglycemiccontrolsignificantlyreducespostoperativeinfectionratesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryametaanalysis
AT yinghuimin postoperativetightglycemiccontrolsignificantlyreducespostoperativeinfectionratesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryametaanalysis
AT chenlong postoperativetightglycemiccontrolsignificantlyreducespostoperativeinfectionratesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryametaanalysis
AT lihuili postoperativetightglycemiccontrolsignificantlyreducespostoperativeinfectionratesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryametaanalysis
AT tianfang postoperativetightglycemiccontrolsignificantlyreducespostoperativeinfectionratesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryametaanalysis
AT zhouzhenfeng postoperativetightglycemiccontrolsignificantlyreducespostoperativeinfectionratesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryametaanalysis