Cargando…
Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study
BACKGROUND: Early appropriate antibiotic treatment is essential in sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted educational intervention to improve antibiotic treatment. We hypothesized that the intervention would hasten and improve the appropriateness of empirical antibiotic administra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29933756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2091-0 |
_version_ | 1783334116484186112 |
---|---|
author | Ferrer, Ricard Martínez, María Luisa Gomà, Gemma Suárez, David Álvarez-Rocha, Luis de la Torre, María Victoria González, Gumersindo Zaragoza, Rafael Borges, Marcio Blanco, Jesús Herrejón, Eduardo Palencia Artigas, Antonio |
author_facet | Ferrer, Ricard Martínez, María Luisa Gomà, Gemma Suárez, David Álvarez-Rocha, Luis de la Torre, María Victoria González, Gumersindo Zaragoza, Rafael Borges, Marcio Blanco, Jesús Herrejón, Eduardo Palencia Artigas, Antonio |
author_sort | Ferrer, Ricard |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early appropriate antibiotic treatment is essential in sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted educational intervention to improve antibiotic treatment. We hypothesized that the intervention would hasten and improve the appropriateness of empirical antibiotic administration, favor de-escalation, and decrease mortality. METHODS: We prospectively studied all consecutive patients with sepsis/septic shock admitted to 72 intensive care units (ICUs) throughout Spain in two 4-month periods (before and immediately after the 3-month intervention). We compared process-of-care variables (resuscitation bundle and time-to-initiation, appropriateness, and de-escalation of empirical antibiotic treatment) and outcome variables between the two cohorts. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. We analyzed the intervention’s long-term impact in a subset of 50 ICUs. RESULTS: We included 2628 patients (age 64.1 ± 15.2 years; men 64.0%; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, 22.0 ± 8.1): 1352 in the preintervention cohort and 1276 in the postintervention cohort. In the postintervention cohort, the mean (SD) time from sepsis onset to empirical antibiotic therapy was lower (2.0 (2.7) vs. 2.5 (3.6) h; p = 0.002), the proportion of inappropriate empirical treatments was lower (6.5% vs. 8.9%; p = 0.024), and the proportion of patients in whom antibiotic treatment was de-escalated was higher (20.1% vs. 16.3%; p = 0.004); the expected reduction in mortality did not reach statistical significance (29.4% in the postintervention cohort vs. 30.5% in the preintervention cohort; p = 0.544). Gains observed after the intervention were maintained in the long-term follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in sepsis treatment, educational interventions can still improve the delivery of care; further improvements might also improve outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2091-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6013897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60138972018-07-05 Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study Ferrer, Ricard Martínez, María Luisa Gomà, Gemma Suárez, David Álvarez-Rocha, Luis de la Torre, María Victoria González, Gumersindo Zaragoza, Rafael Borges, Marcio Blanco, Jesús Herrejón, Eduardo Palencia Artigas, Antonio Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Early appropriate antibiotic treatment is essential in sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted educational intervention to improve antibiotic treatment. We hypothesized that the intervention would hasten and improve the appropriateness of empirical antibiotic administration, favor de-escalation, and decrease mortality. METHODS: We prospectively studied all consecutive patients with sepsis/septic shock admitted to 72 intensive care units (ICUs) throughout Spain in two 4-month periods (before and immediately after the 3-month intervention). We compared process-of-care variables (resuscitation bundle and time-to-initiation, appropriateness, and de-escalation of empirical antibiotic treatment) and outcome variables between the two cohorts. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. We analyzed the intervention’s long-term impact in a subset of 50 ICUs. RESULTS: We included 2628 patients (age 64.1 ± 15.2 years; men 64.0%; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, 22.0 ± 8.1): 1352 in the preintervention cohort and 1276 in the postintervention cohort. In the postintervention cohort, the mean (SD) time from sepsis onset to empirical antibiotic therapy was lower (2.0 (2.7) vs. 2.5 (3.6) h; p = 0.002), the proportion of inappropriate empirical treatments was lower (6.5% vs. 8.9%; p = 0.024), and the proportion of patients in whom antibiotic treatment was de-escalated was higher (20.1% vs. 16.3%; p = 0.004); the expected reduction in mortality did not reach statistical significance (29.4% in the postintervention cohort vs. 30.5% in the preintervention cohort; p = 0.544). Gains observed after the intervention were maintained in the long-term follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in sepsis treatment, educational interventions can still improve the delivery of care; further improvements might also improve outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2091-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6013897/ /pubmed/29933756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2091-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Ferrer, Ricard Martínez, María Luisa Gomà, Gemma Suárez, David Álvarez-Rocha, Luis de la Torre, María Victoria González, Gumersindo Zaragoza, Rafael Borges, Marcio Blanco, Jesús Herrejón, Eduardo Palencia Artigas, Antonio Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study |
title | Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study |
title_full | Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study |
title_fullStr | Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study |
title_full_unstemmed | Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study |
title_short | Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study |
title_sort | improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the abiss-edusepsis study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29933756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2091-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferrerricard improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy AT martinezmarialuisa improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy AT gomagemma improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy AT suarezdavid improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy AT alvarezrochaluis improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy AT delatorremariavictoria improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy AT gonzalezgumersindo improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy AT zaragozarafael improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy AT borgesmarcio improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy AT blancojesus improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy AT herrejoneduardopalencia improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy AT artigasantonio improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy AT improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy |