Cargando…

Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study

BACKGROUND: Early appropriate antibiotic treatment is essential in sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted educational intervention to improve antibiotic treatment. We hypothesized that the intervention would hasten and improve the appropriateness of empirical antibiotic administra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrer, Ricard, Martínez, María Luisa, Gomà, Gemma, Suárez, David, Álvarez-Rocha, Luis, de la Torre, María Victoria, González, Gumersindo, Zaragoza, Rafael, Borges, Marcio, Blanco, Jesús, Herrejón, Eduardo Palencia, Artigas, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29933756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2091-0
_version_ 1783334116484186112
author Ferrer, Ricard
Martínez, María Luisa
Gomà, Gemma
Suárez, David
Álvarez-Rocha, Luis
de la Torre, María Victoria
González, Gumersindo
Zaragoza, Rafael
Borges, Marcio
Blanco, Jesús
Herrejón, Eduardo Palencia
Artigas, Antonio
author_facet Ferrer, Ricard
Martínez, María Luisa
Gomà, Gemma
Suárez, David
Álvarez-Rocha, Luis
de la Torre, María Victoria
González, Gumersindo
Zaragoza, Rafael
Borges, Marcio
Blanco, Jesús
Herrejón, Eduardo Palencia
Artigas, Antonio
author_sort Ferrer, Ricard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early appropriate antibiotic treatment is essential in sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted educational intervention to improve antibiotic treatment. We hypothesized that the intervention would hasten and improve the appropriateness of empirical antibiotic administration, favor de-escalation, and decrease mortality. METHODS: We prospectively studied all consecutive patients with sepsis/septic shock admitted to 72 intensive care units (ICUs) throughout Spain in two 4-month periods (before and immediately after the 3-month intervention). We compared process-of-care variables (resuscitation bundle and time-to-initiation, appropriateness, and de-escalation of empirical antibiotic treatment) and outcome variables between the two cohorts. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. We analyzed the intervention’s long-term impact in a subset of 50 ICUs. RESULTS: We included 2628 patients (age 64.1 ± 15.2 years; men 64.0%; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, 22.0 ± 8.1): 1352 in the preintervention cohort and 1276 in the postintervention cohort. In the postintervention cohort, the mean (SD) time from sepsis onset to empirical antibiotic therapy was lower (2.0 (2.7) vs. 2.5 (3.6) h; p = 0.002), the proportion of inappropriate empirical treatments was lower (6.5% vs. 8.9%; p = 0.024), and the proportion of patients in whom antibiotic treatment was de-escalated was higher (20.1% vs. 16.3%; p = 0.004); the expected reduction in mortality did not reach statistical significance (29.4% in the postintervention cohort vs. 30.5% in the preintervention cohort; p = 0.544). Gains observed after the intervention were maintained in the long-term follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in sepsis treatment, educational interventions can still improve the delivery of care; further improvements might also improve outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2091-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6013897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60138972018-07-05 Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study Ferrer, Ricard Martínez, María Luisa Gomà, Gemma Suárez, David Álvarez-Rocha, Luis de la Torre, María Victoria González, Gumersindo Zaragoza, Rafael Borges, Marcio Blanco, Jesús Herrejón, Eduardo Palencia Artigas, Antonio Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Early appropriate antibiotic treatment is essential in sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted educational intervention to improve antibiotic treatment. We hypothesized that the intervention would hasten and improve the appropriateness of empirical antibiotic administration, favor de-escalation, and decrease mortality. METHODS: We prospectively studied all consecutive patients with sepsis/septic shock admitted to 72 intensive care units (ICUs) throughout Spain in two 4-month periods (before and immediately after the 3-month intervention). We compared process-of-care variables (resuscitation bundle and time-to-initiation, appropriateness, and de-escalation of empirical antibiotic treatment) and outcome variables between the two cohorts. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. We analyzed the intervention’s long-term impact in a subset of 50 ICUs. RESULTS: We included 2628 patients (age 64.1 ± 15.2 years; men 64.0%; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, 22.0 ± 8.1): 1352 in the preintervention cohort and 1276 in the postintervention cohort. In the postintervention cohort, the mean (SD) time from sepsis onset to empirical antibiotic therapy was lower (2.0 (2.7) vs. 2.5 (3.6) h; p = 0.002), the proportion of inappropriate empirical treatments was lower (6.5% vs. 8.9%; p = 0.024), and the proportion of patients in whom antibiotic treatment was de-escalated was higher (20.1% vs. 16.3%; p = 0.004); the expected reduction in mortality did not reach statistical significance (29.4% in the postintervention cohort vs. 30.5% in the preintervention cohort; p = 0.544). Gains observed after the intervention were maintained in the long-term follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in sepsis treatment, educational interventions can still improve the delivery of care; further improvements might also improve outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2091-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6013897/ /pubmed/29933756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2091-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ferrer, Ricard
Martínez, María Luisa
Gomà, Gemma
Suárez, David
Álvarez-Rocha, Luis
de la Torre, María Victoria
González, Gumersindo
Zaragoza, Rafael
Borges, Marcio
Blanco, Jesús
Herrejón, Eduardo Palencia
Artigas, Antonio
Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study
title Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study
title_full Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study
title_fullStr Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study
title_full_unstemmed Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study
title_short Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study
title_sort improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the abiss-edusepsis study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29933756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2091-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrerricard improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy
AT martinezmarialuisa improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy
AT gomagemma improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy
AT suarezdavid improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy
AT alvarezrochaluis improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy
AT delatorremariavictoria improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy
AT gonzalezgumersindo improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy
AT zaragozarafael improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy
AT borgesmarcio improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy
AT blancojesus improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy
AT herrejoneduardopalencia improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy
AT artigasantonio improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy
AT improvedempiricalantibiotictreatmentofsepsisafteraneducationalinterventiontheabissedusepsisstudy