Cargando…

Predictors of female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and qualitative analysis through gender inequality paradigms

BACKGROUND: Female sexual dysfunction affects 41% of reproductive-age women worldwide, making it a highly prevalent medical issue. Predictors of female sexual dysfunction are multifaceted and vary from country to country. A synthesis of potential risk factors and protective factors may aid healthcar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCool-Myers, Megan, Theurich, Melissa, Zuelke, Andrea, Knuettel, Helge, Apfelbacher, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0602-4
_version_ 1783334136332681216
author McCool-Myers, Megan
Theurich, Melissa
Zuelke, Andrea
Knuettel, Helge
Apfelbacher, Christian
author_facet McCool-Myers, Megan
Theurich, Melissa
Zuelke, Andrea
Knuettel, Helge
Apfelbacher, Christian
author_sort McCool-Myers, Megan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Female sexual dysfunction affects 41% of reproductive-age women worldwide, making it a highly prevalent medical issue. Predictors of female sexual dysfunction are multifaceted and vary from country to country. A synthesis of potential risk factors and protective factors may aid healthcare practitioners in identifying populations at risk, in addition to revealing modifiable factors to prevent sexual dysfunction among reproductive-age women. METHODS: Observational studies which assessed the prevalence and predictors of female sexual dysfunction in reproductive-age women were systematically sought in relevant databases (2000–2014). Significant predictors were extracted from each included publication. A qualitative analysis of predictors was performed with a focus on types of sexual regimes and level of human development. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five studies from 41 countries were included in the systematic review. The types of predictors varied according to the location of the study, the type of sexual regime and the level of gender inequality in that country/region. Consistently significant risk factors of female sexual dysfunction were: poor physical health, poor mental health, stress, abortion, genitourinary problems, female genital mutilation, relationship dissatisfaction, sexual abuse, and being religious. Consistently significant protective factors included: older age at marriage, exercising, daily affection, intimate communication, having a positive body image, and sex education. Some factors however had an unclear effect: age, education, employment, parity, being in a relationship, frequency of sexual intercourse, race, alcohol consumption, smoking and masturbation. CONCLUSIONS: The sexual and reproductive lives of women are highly impacted by female sexual dysfunction, and a number of biological, psychological and social factors play a role in the prevalence of sexual dysfunction. Healthcare professionals who work with women should be aware of the many risk factors for reproductive-age women. Future prevention strategies should aim to address modifiable factors, e.g. physical activity and access to sex education; international efforts in empowering women should continue. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-018-0602-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6013982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60139822018-07-05 Predictors of female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and qualitative analysis through gender inequality paradigms McCool-Myers, Megan Theurich, Melissa Zuelke, Andrea Knuettel, Helge Apfelbacher, Christian BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Female sexual dysfunction affects 41% of reproductive-age women worldwide, making it a highly prevalent medical issue. Predictors of female sexual dysfunction are multifaceted and vary from country to country. A synthesis of potential risk factors and protective factors may aid healthcare practitioners in identifying populations at risk, in addition to revealing modifiable factors to prevent sexual dysfunction among reproductive-age women. METHODS: Observational studies which assessed the prevalence and predictors of female sexual dysfunction in reproductive-age women were systematically sought in relevant databases (2000–2014). Significant predictors were extracted from each included publication. A qualitative analysis of predictors was performed with a focus on types of sexual regimes and level of human development. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five studies from 41 countries were included in the systematic review. The types of predictors varied according to the location of the study, the type of sexual regime and the level of gender inequality in that country/region. Consistently significant risk factors of female sexual dysfunction were: poor physical health, poor mental health, stress, abortion, genitourinary problems, female genital mutilation, relationship dissatisfaction, sexual abuse, and being religious. Consistently significant protective factors included: older age at marriage, exercising, daily affection, intimate communication, having a positive body image, and sex education. Some factors however had an unclear effect: age, education, employment, parity, being in a relationship, frequency of sexual intercourse, race, alcohol consumption, smoking and masturbation. CONCLUSIONS: The sexual and reproductive lives of women are highly impacted by female sexual dysfunction, and a number of biological, psychological and social factors play a role in the prevalence of sexual dysfunction. Healthcare professionals who work with women should be aware of the many risk factors for reproductive-age women. Future prevention strategies should aim to address modifiable factors, e.g. physical activity and access to sex education; international efforts in empowering women should continue. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-018-0602-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6013982/ /pubmed/29929499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0602-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
McCool-Myers, Megan
Theurich, Melissa
Zuelke, Andrea
Knuettel, Helge
Apfelbacher, Christian
Predictors of female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and qualitative analysis through gender inequality paradigms
title Predictors of female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and qualitative analysis through gender inequality paradigms
title_full Predictors of female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and qualitative analysis through gender inequality paradigms
title_fullStr Predictors of female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and qualitative analysis through gender inequality paradigms
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and qualitative analysis through gender inequality paradigms
title_short Predictors of female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and qualitative analysis through gender inequality paradigms
title_sort predictors of female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and qualitative analysis through gender inequality paradigms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0602-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mccoolmyersmegan predictorsoffemalesexualdysfunctionasystematicreviewandqualitativeanalysisthroughgenderinequalityparadigms
AT theurichmelissa predictorsoffemalesexualdysfunctionasystematicreviewandqualitativeanalysisthroughgenderinequalityparadigms
AT zuelkeandrea predictorsoffemalesexualdysfunctionasystematicreviewandqualitativeanalysisthroughgenderinequalityparadigms
AT knuettelhelge predictorsoffemalesexualdysfunctionasystematicreviewandqualitativeanalysisthroughgenderinequalityparadigms
AT apfelbacherchristian predictorsoffemalesexualdysfunctionasystematicreviewandqualitativeanalysisthroughgenderinequalityparadigms