Cargando…

Comparing surgical interventions for intertrochanteric hip fracture by blood loss and operation time: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Multiple operative treatments are available for the fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. This analysis was conducted to provide guidance on the appropriate clinical choice to accommodate individual patients. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify relevant arti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hao, Zhengan, Wang, Xifeng, Zhang, Xingqun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0852-8
_version_ 1783334139860090880
author Hao, Zhengan
Wang, Xifeng
Zhang, Xingqun
author_facet Hao, Zhengan
Wang, Xifeng
Zhang, Xingqun
author_sort Hao, Zhengan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple operative treatments are available for the fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. This analysis was conducted to provide guidance on the appropriate clinical choice to accommodate individual patients. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify relevant articles in databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with intertrochanteric femoral fractures were eligible if they compared 2 or more of the following interventions: proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) use, dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation, gamma nail (GN) fixation, and artificial femoral head replacement (FHR). Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to simultaneously compare all treatment methods. RESULTS: In total, 24 active-comparator studies involving 3097 participants were identified. Across all populations, greater reductions in blood loss and operation time were observed for PFNA than for other treatments. In terms of bleeding, more blood loss was observed for DHS use than for the PFNA (SMD, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.01–1.96), PCCP (SMD, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.31–2.20), and GN (SMD, 0.26; 95% CI, − 0.35–0.87) techniques. However, a more beneficial effect was observed for DHS use than for FHR (SMD, − 0.23; 95% CI, − 1.26–0.81). DHS use resulted in a significantly longer duration of operation time than the PFNA (SMD, 0.75; 95% CI, − 0.02–0.75), PCCP (SMD, 0.61; 95% CI, − 0.20–1.44), and GN (SMD, 0.25; 95% CI, − 0.26–0.77) techniques. Similarly, greater reductions in operation time were observed for DHS use than for FHR (SMD, − 0.12; 95% CI, − 1.15–0.91). CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide supporting evidence demonstrating the superiority of PFNA over other treatments for intertrochanteric femoral fracture. PFNA treatment results in the lowest amount of blood loss and the shortest operation time. These findings add to the existing knowledge of intertrochanteric femoral fracture treatment options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6013997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60139972018-07-05 Comparing surgical interventions for intertrochanteric hip fracture by blood loss and operation time: a network meta-analysis Hao, Zhengan Wang, Xifeng Zhang, Xingqun J Orthop Surg Res Review BACKGROUND: Multiple operative treatments are available for the fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. This analysis was conducted to provide guidance on the appropriate clinical choice to accommodate individual patients. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify relevant articles in databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with intertrochanteric femoral fractures were eligible if they compared 2 or more of the following interventions: proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) use, dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation, gamma nail (GN) fixation, and artificial femoral head replacement (FHR). Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to simultaneously compare all treatment methods. RESULTS: In total, 24 active-comparator studies involving 3097 participants were identified. Across all populations, greater reductions in blood loss and operation time were observed for PFNA than for other treatments. In terms of bleeding, more blood loss was observed for DHS use than for the PFNA (SMD, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.01–1.96), PCCP (SMD, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.31–2.20), and GN (SMD, 0.26; 95% CI, − 0.35–0.87) techniques. However, a more beneficial effect was observed for DHS use than for FHR (SMD, − 0.23; 95% CI, − 1.26–0.81). DHS use resulted in a significantly longer duration of operation time than the PFNA (SMD, 0.75; 95% CI, − 0.02–0.75), PCCP (SMD, 0.61; 95% CI, − 0.20–1.44), and GN (SMD, 0.25; 95% CI, − 0.26–0.77) techniques. Similarly, greater reductions in operation time were observed for DHS use than for FHR (SMD, − 0.12; 95% CI, − 1.15–0.91). CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide supporting evidence demonstrating the superiority of PFNA over other treatments for intertrochanteric femoral fracture. PFNA treatment results in the lowest amount of blood loss and the shortest operation time. These findings add to the existing knowledge of intertrochanteric femoral fracture treatment options. BioMed Central 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6013997/ /pubmed/29929525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0852-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Hao, Zhengan
Wang, Xifeng
Zhang, Xingqun
Comparing surgical interventions for intertrochanteric hip fracture by blood loss and operation time: a network meta-analysis
title Comparing surgical interventions for intertrochanteric hip fracture by blood loss and operation time: a network meta-analysis
title_full Comparing surgical interventions for intertrochanteric hip fracture by blood loss and operation time: a network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparing surgical interventions for intertrochanteric hip fracture by blood loss and operation time: a network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparing surgical interventions for intertrochanteric hip fracture by blood loss and operation time: a network meta-analysis
title_short Comparing surgical interventions for intertrochanteric hip fracture by blood loss and operation time: a network meta-analysis
title_sort comparing surgical interventions for intertrochanteric hip fracture by blood loss and operation time: a network meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0852-8
work_keys_str_mv AT haozhengan comparingsurgicalinterventionsforintertrochanterichipfracturebybloodlossandoperationtimeanetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangxifeng comparingsurgicalinterventionsforintertrochanterichipfracturebybloodlossandoperationtimeanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangxingqun comparingsurgicalinterventionsforintertrochanterichipfracturebybloodlossandoperationtimeanetworkmetaanalysis