Cargando…

Recording blood pressure and eGFR in primary care after the Belgrade screening study

Background: In 2009, Belgrade nephrologists and general practitioners from thirteen health centers carried out screening for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Three years later, medical records of patients from four health centers participating in the screening study were retrospectively analyzed in ord...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lezaic, Visnja, Marinkovic, Jelena, Milutinovic, Zoran, Jovanovic-Vasiljevic, Nada, Vujicic, Vesna, Pejovic, Branka, Kalabic, Snezana, Djukanovic, Ljubica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6014502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29565226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2018.1450759
_version_ 1783334247828815872
author Lezaic, Visnja
Marinkovic, Jelena
Milutinovic, Zoran
Jovanovic-Vasiljevic, Nada
Vujicic, Vesna
Pejovic, Branka
Kalabic, Snezana
Djukanovic, Ljubica
author_facet Lezaic, Visnja
Marinkovic, Jelena
Milutinovic, Zoran
Jovanovic-Vasiljevic, Nada
Vujicic, Vesna
Pejovic, Branka
Kalabic, Snezana
Djukanovic, Ljubica
author_sort Lezaic, Visnja
collection PubMed
description Background: In 2009, Belgrade nephrologists and general practitioners from thirteen health centers carried out screening for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Three years later, medical records of patients from four health centers participating in the screening study were retrospectively analyzed in order to check whether general practitioners had continued to control patients at risk for CKD in accordance with the recommendations provided. Methods: The study included 460 patients who visited their doctor at least once in the three-year period. Data on blood pressure, ACEI use, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and comorbidities were taken from patients’ medical records. Results: Blood pressure was not recorded in any of the three years in 42.8% and eGFR in 36.7% of the patients, but blood pressure was registered every year in 7.8% and eGFR in 4.3% of them. Over the three years, the relative number of patients with recorded blood pressure decreased from 41.7% to 17.8%, and with recorded eGFR from 41.7% to 21.5%. Multivariate linear regression found that Health Center, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and presence of hypertension were negatively associated with number of years with recorded blood pressure. Health Center, systolic blood pressure and sum of years with recorded eGFR below 60 ml/min/1.73m(2) were associated with number of years with recorded eGFR. Conclusions: Under-recording of blood pressure and eGFR in primary care health centers suggests lack of adherence to current guidelines and insufficient care of CKD patients. This implies the necessity for continuous education of physicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6014502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60145022018-06-28 Recording blood pressure and eGFR in primary care after the Belgrade screening study Lezaic, Visnja Marinkovic, Jelena Milutinovic, Zoran Jovanovic-Vasiljevic, Nada Vujicic, Vesna Pejovic, Branka Kalabic, Snezana Djukanovic, Ljubica Ren Fail Clinical Study Background: In 2009, Belgrade nephrologists and general practitioners from thirteen health centers carried out screening for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Three years later, medical records of patients from four health centers participating in the screening study were retrospectively analyzed in order to check whether general practitioners had continued to control patients at risk for CKD in accordance with the recommendations provided. Methods: The study included 460 patients who visited their doctor at least once in the three-year period. Data on blood pressure, ACEI use, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and comorbidities were taken from patients’ medical records. Results: Blood pressure was not recorded in any of the three years in 42.8% and eGFR in 36.7% of the patients, but blood pressure was registered every year in 7.8% and eGFR in 4.3% of them. Over the three years, the relative number of patients with recorded blood pressure decreased from 41.7% to 17.8%, and with recorded eGFR from 41.7% to 21.5%. Multivariate linear regression found that Health Center, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and presence of hypertension were negatively associated with number of years with recorded blood pressure. Health Center, systolic blood pressure and sum of years with recorded eGFR below 60 ml/min/1.73m(2) were associated with number of years with recorded eGFR. Conclusions: Under-recording of blood pressure and eGFR in primary care health centers suggests lack of adherence to current guidelines and insufficient care of CKD patients. This implies the necessity for continuous education of physicians. Taylor & Francis 2018-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6014502/ /pubmed/29565226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2018.1450759 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Lezaic, Visnja
Marinkovic, Jelena
Milutinovic, Zoran
Jovanovic-Vasiljevic, Nada
Vujicic, Vesna
Pejovic, Branka
Kalabic, Snezana
Djukanovic, Ljubica
Recording blood pressure and eGFR in primary care after the Belgrade screening study
title Recording blood pressure and eGFR in primary care after the Belgrade screening study
title_full Recording blood pressure and eGFR in primary care after the Belgrade screening study
title_fullStr Recording blood pressure and eGFR in primary care after the Belgrade screening study
title_full_unstemmed Recording blood pressure and eGFR in primary care after the Belgrade screening study
title_short Recording blood pressure and eGFR in primary care after the Belgrade screening study
title_sort recording blood pressure and egfr in primary care after the belgrade screening study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6014502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29565226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2018.1450759
work_keys_str_mv AT lezaicvisnja recordingbloodpressureandegfrinprimarycareafterthebelgradescreeningstudy
AT marinkovicjelena recordingbloodpressureandegfrinprimarycareafterthebelgradescreeningstudy
AT milutinoviczoran recordingbloodpressureandegfrinprimarycareafterthebelgradescreeningstudy
AT jovanovicvasiljevicnada recordingbloodpressureandegfrinprimarycareafterthebelgradescreeningstudy
AT vujicicvesna recordingbloodpressureandegfrinprimarycareafterthebelgradescreeningstudy
AT pejovicbranka recordingbloodpressureandegfrinprimarycareafterthebelgradescreeningstudy
AT kalabicsnezana recordingbloodpressureandegfrinprimarycareafterthebelgradescreeningstudy
AT djukanovicljubica recordingbloodpressureandegfrinprimarycareafterthebelgradescreeningstudy