Cargando…

Instances of erroneous DNA barcoding of metazoan invertebrates: Are universal cox1 gene primers too “universal”?

The cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1) gene is the main mitochondrial molecular marker playing a pivotal role in phylogenetic research and is a crucial barcode sequence. Folmer’s “universal” primers designed to amplify this gene in metazoan invertebrates allowed quick and easy barcode and phyloge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mioduchowska, Monika, Czyż, Michał Jan, Gołdyn, Bartłomiej, Kur, Jarosław, Sell, Jerzy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6014667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29933389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199609
_version_ 1783334269974740992
author Mioduchowska, Monika
Czyż, Michał Jan
Gołdyn, Bartłomiej
Kur, Jarosław
Sell, Jerzy
author_facet Mioduchowska, Monika
Czyż, Michał Jan
Gołdyn, Bartłomiej
Kur, Jarosław
Sell, Jerzy
author_sort Mioduchowska, Monika
collection PubMed
description The cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1) gene is the main mitochondrial molecular marker playing a pivotal role in phylogenetic research and is a crucial barcode sequence. Folmer’s “universal” primers designed to amplify this gene in metazoan invertebrates allowed quick and easy barcode and phylogenetic analysis. On the other hand, the increase in the number of studies on barcoding leads to more frequent publishing of incorrect sequences, due to amplification of non-target taxa, and insufficient analysis of the obtained sequences. Consequently, some sequences deposited in genetic databases are incorrectly described as obtained from invertebrates, while being in fact bacterial sequences. In our study, in which we used Folmer’s primers to amplify COI sequences of the crustacean fairy shrimp Branchipus schaefferi (Fischer 1834), we also obtained COI sequences of microbial contaminants from Aeromonas sp. However, when we searched the GenBank database for sequences closely matching these contaminations we found entries described as representatives of Gastrotricha and Mollusca. When these entries were compared with other sequences bearing the same names in the database, the genetic distance between the incorrect and correct sequences amplified from the same species was c.a. 65%. Although the responsibility for the correct molecular identification of species rests on researchers, the errors found in already published sequences data have not been re-evaluated so far. On the basis of the standard sampling technique we have estimated with 95% probability that the chances of finding incorrectly described metazoan sequences in the GenBank depend on the systematic group, and variety from less than 1% (Mollusca and Arthropoda) up to 6.9% (Gastrotricha). Consequently, the increasing popularity of DNA barcoding and metabarcoding analysis may lead to overestimation of species diversity. Finally, the study also discusses the sources of the problems with amplification of non-target sequences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6014667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60146672018-07-06 Instances of erroneous DNA barcoding of metazoan invertebrates: Are universal cox1 gene primers too “universal”? Mioduchowska, Monika Czyż, Michał Jan Gołdyn, Bartłomiej Kur, Jarosław Sell, Jerzy PLoS One Research Article The cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1) gene is the main mitochondrial molecular marker playing a pivotal role in phylogenetic research and is a crucial barcode sequence. Folmer’s “universal” primers designed to amplify this gene in metazoan invertebrates allowed quick and easy barcode and phylogenetic analysis. On the other hand, the increase in the number of studies on barcoding leads to more frequent publishing of incorrect sequences, due to amplification of non-target taxa, and insufficient analysis of the obtained sequences. Consequently, some sequences deposited in genetic databases are incorrectly described as obtained from invertebrates, while being in fact bacterial sequences. In our study, in which we used Folmer’s primers to amplify COI sequences of the crustacean fairy shrimp Branchipus schaefferi (Fischer 1834), we also obtained COI sequences of microbial contaminants from Aeromonas sp. However, when we searched the GenBank database for sequences closely matching these contaminations we found entries described as representatives of Gastrotricha and Mollusca. When these entries were compared with other sequences bearing the same names in the database, the genetic distance between the incorrect and correct sequences amplified from the same species was c.a. 65%. Although the responsibility for the correct molecular identification of species rests on researchers, the errors found in already published sequences data have not been re-evaluated so far. On the basis of the standard sampling technique we have estimated with 95% probability that the chances of finding incorrectly described metazoan sequences in the GenBank depend on the systematic group, and variety from less than 1% (Mollusca and Arthropoda) up to 6.9% (Gastrotricha). Consequently, the increasing popularity of DNA barcoding and metabarcoding analysis may lead to overestimation of species diversity. Finally, the study also discusses the sources of the problems with amplification of non-target sequences. Public Library of Science 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6014667/ /pubmed/29933389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199609 Text en © 2018 Mioduchowska et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mioduchowska, Monika
Czyż, Michał Jan
Gołdyn, Bartłomiej
Kur, Jarosław
Sell, Jerzy
Instances of erroneous DNA barcoding of metazoan invertebrates: Are universal cox1 gene primers too “universal”?
title Instances of erroneous DNA barcoding of metazoan invertebrates: Are universal cox1 gene primers too “universal”?
title_full Instances of erroneous DNA barcoding of metazoan invertebrates: Are universal cox1 gene primers too “universal”?
title_fullStr Instances of erroneous DNA barcoding of metazoan invertebrates: Are universal cox1 gene primers too “universal”?
title_full_unstemmed Instances of erroneous DNA barcoding of metazoan invertebrates: Are universal cox1 gene primers too “universal”?
title_short Instances of erroneous DNA barcoding of metazoan invertebrates: Are universal cox1 gene primers too “universal”?
title_sort instances of erroneous dna barcoding of metazoan invertebrates: are universal cox1 gene primers too “universal”?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6014667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29933389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199609
work_keys_str_mv AT mioduchowskamonika instancesoferroneousdnabarcodingofmetazoaninvertebratesareuniversalcox1geneprimerstoouniversal
AT czyzmichałjan instancesoferroneousdnabarcodingofmetazoaninvertebratesareuniversalcox1geneprimerstoouniversal
AT gołdynbartłomiej instancesoferroneousdnabarcodingofmetazoaninvertebratesareuniversalcox1geneprimerstoouniversal
AT kurjarosław instancesoferroneousdnabarcodingofmetazoaninvertebratesareuniversalcox1geneprimerstoouniversal
AT selljerzy instancesoferroneousdnabarcodingofmetazoaninvertebratesareuniversalcox1geneprimerstoouniversal