Cargando…
Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency
BACKGROUND: During visual exploration or free-view, gaze positioning is largely determined by the tendency to maximize visual saliency: more salient locations are more likely to be fixated. However, when visual input is completely irrelevant for performance, such as with non-visual tasks, this salie...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6014668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29933381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198242 |
_version_ | 1783334270204379136 |
---|---|
author | Abeles, Dekel Amit, Roy Yuval-Greenberg, Shlomit |
author_facet | Abeles, Dekel Amit, Roy Yuval-Greenberg, Shlomit |
author_sort | Abeles, Dekel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During visual exploration or free-view, gaze positioning is largely determined by the tendency to maximize visual saliency: more salient locations are more likely to be fixated. However, when visual input is completely irrelevant for performance, such as with non-visual tasks, this saliency maximization strategy may be less advantageous and potentially even disruptive for task-performance. Here, we examined whether visual saliency remains a strong driving force in determining gaze positions even in non-visual tasks. We tested three alternative hypotheses: a) That saliency is disadvantageous for non-visual tasks and therefore gaze would tend to shift away from it and towards non-salient locations; b) That saliency is irrelevant during non-visual tasks and therefore gaze would not be directed towards it but also not away-from it; c) That saliency maximization is a strong behavioral drive that would prevail even during non-visual tasks. METHODS: Gaze position was monitored as participants performed visual or non-visual tasks while they were presented with complex or simple images. The effect of attentional demands was examined by comparing an easy non-visual task with a more difficult one. RESULTS: Exploratory behavior was evident, regardless of task difficulty, even when the task was non-visual and the visual input was entirely irrelevant. The observed exploratory behaviors included a strong tendency to fixate salient locations, central fixation bias and a gradual reduction in saliency for later fixations. These exploratory behaviors were spatially similar to those of an explicit visual exploration task but they were, nevertheless, attenuated. Temporal differences were also found: in the non-visual task there were longer fixations and later first fixations than in the visual task, reflecting slower visual sampling in this task. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in the presence of a rich visual environment, visual exploration is evident even when there is no explicit instruction to explore. Compared to visually motivated tasks, exploration in non-visual tasks follows similar selection mechanisms, but occurs at a lower rate. This is consistent with the view that the non-visual task is the equivalent of a dual-task: it combines the instructed task with an uninstructed, perhaps even mandatory, exploratory behavior. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6014668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60146682018-07-06 Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency Abeles, Dekel Amit, Roy Yuval-Greenberg, Shlomit PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: During visual exploration or free-view, gaze positioning is largely determined by the tendency to maximize visual saliency: more salient locations are more likely to be fixated. However, when visual input is completely irrelevant for performance, such as with non-visual tasks, this saliency maximization strategy may be less advantageous and potentially even disruptive for task-performance. Here, we examined whether visual saliency remains a strong driving force in determining gaze positions even in non-visual tasks. We tested three alternative hypotheses: a) That saliency is disadvantageous for non-visual tasks and therefore gaze would tend to shift away from it and towards non-salient locations; b) That saliency is irrelevant during non-visual tasks and therefore gaze would not be directed towards it but also not away-from it; c) That saliency maximization is a strong behavioral drive that would prevail even during non-visual tasks. METHODS: Gaze position was monitored as participants performed visual or non-visual tasks while they were presented with complex or simple images. The effect of attentional demands was examined by comparing an easy non-visual task with a more difficult one. RESULTS: Exploratory behavior was evident, regardless of task difficulty, even when the task was non-visual and the visual input was entirely irrelevant. The observed exploratory behaviors included a strong tendency to fixate salient locations, central fixation bias and a gradual reduction in saliency for later fixations. These exploratory behaviors were spatially similar to those of an explicit visual exploration task but they were, nevertheless, attenuated. Temporal differences were also found: in the non-visual task there were longer fixations and later first fixations than in the visual task, reflecting slower visual sampling in this task. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in the presence of a rich visual environment, visual exploration is evident even when there is no explicit instruction to explore. Compared to visually motivated tasks, exploration in non-visual tasks follows similar selection mechanisms, but occurs at a lower rate. This is consistent with the view that the non-visual task is the equivalent of a dual-task: it combines the instructed task with an uninstructed, perhaps even mandatory, exploratory behavior. Public Library of Science 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6014668/ /pubmed/29933381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198242 Text en © 2018 Abeles et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Abeles, Dekel Amit, Roy Yuval-Greenberg, Shlomit Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency |
title | Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency |
title_full | Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency |
title_fullStr | Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency |
title_full_unstemmed | Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency |
title_short | Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency |
title_sort | oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: the role of visual saliency |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6014668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29933381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abelesdekel oculomotorbehaviorduringnonvisualtaskstheroleofvisualsaliency AT amitroy oculomotorbehaviorduringnonvisualtaskstheroleofvisualsaliency AT yuvalgreenbergshlomit oculomotorbehaviorduringnonvisualtaskstheroleofvisualsaliency |