Cargando…

Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency

BACKGROUND: During visual exploration or free-view, gaze positioning is largely determined by the tendency to maximize visual saliency: more salient locations are more likely to be fixated. However, when visual input is completely irrelevant for performance, such as with non-visual tasks, this salie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abeles, Dekel, Amit, Roy, Yuval-Greenberg, Shlomit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6014668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29933381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198242
_version_ 1783334270204379136
author Abeles, Dekel
Amit, Roy
Yuval-Greenberg, Shlomit
author_facet Abeles, Dekel
Amit, Roy
Yuval-Greenberg, Shlomit
author_sort Abeles, Dekel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During visual exploration or free-view, gaze positioning is largely determined by the tendency to maximize visual saliency: more salient locations are more likely to be fixated. However, when visual input is completely irrelevant for performance, such as with non-visual tasks, this saliency maximization strategy may be less advantageous and potentially even disruptive for task-performance. Here, we examined whether visual saliency remains a strong driving force in determining gaze positions even in non-visual tasks. We tested three alternative hypotheses: a) That saliency is disadvantageous for non-visual tasks and therefore gaze would tend to shift away from it and towards non-salient locations; b) That saliency is irrelevant during non-visual tasks and therefore gaze would not be directed towards it but also not away-from it; c) That saliency maximization is a strong behavioral drive that would prevail even during non-visual tasks. METHODS: Gaze position was monitored as participants performed visual or non-visual tasks while they were presented with complex or simple images. The effect of attentional demands was examined by comparing an easy non-visual task with a more difficult one. RESULTS: Exploratory behavior was evident, regardless of task difficulty, even when the task was non-visual and the visual input was entirely irrelevant. The observed exploratory behaviors included a strong tendency to fixate salient locations, central fixation bias and a gradual reduction in saliency for later fixations. These exploratory behaviors were spatially similar to those of an explicit visual exploration task but they were, nevertheless, attenuated. Temporal differences were also found: in the non-visual task there were longer fixations and later first fixations than in the visual task, reflecting slower visual sampling in this task. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in the presence of a rich visual environment, visual exploration is evident even when there is no explicit instruction to explore. Compared to visually motivated tasks, exploration in non-visual tasks follows similar selection mechanisms, but occurs at a lower rate. This is consistent with the view that the non-visual task is the equivalent of a dual-task: it combines the instructed task with an uninstructed, perhaps even mandatory, exploratory behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6014668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60146682018-07-06 Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency Abeles, Dekel Amit, Roy Yuval-Greenberg, Shlomit PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: During visual exploration or free-view, gaze positioning is largely determined by the tendency to maximize visual saliency: more salient locations are more likely to be fixated. However, when visual input is completely irrelevant for performance, such as with non-visual tasks, this saliency maximization strategy may be less advantageous and potentially even disruptive for task-performance. Here, we examined whether visual saliency remains a strong driving force in determining gaze positions even in non-visual tasks. We tested three alternative hypotheses: a) That saliency is disadvantageous for non-visual tasks and therefore gaze would tend to shift away from it and towards non-salient locations; b) That saliency is irrelevant during non-visual tasks and therefore gaze would not be directed towards it but also not away-from it; c) That saliency maximization is a strong behavioral drive that would prevail even during non-visual tasks. METHODS: Gaze position was monitored as participants performed visual or non-visual tasks while they were presented with complex or simple images. The effect of attentional demands was examined by comparing an easy non-visual task with a more difficult one. RESULTS: Exploratory behavior was evident, regardless of task difficulty, even when the task was non-visual and the visual input was entirely irrelevant. The observed exploratory behaviors included a strong tendency to fixate salient locations, central fixation bias and a gradual reduction in saliency for later fixations. These exploratory behaviors were spatially similar to those of an explicit visual exploration task but they were, nevertheless, attenuated. Temporal differences were also found: in the non-visual task there were longer fixations and later first fixations than in the visual task, reflecting slower visual sampling in this task. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in the presence of a rich visual environment, visual exploration is evident even when there is no explicit instruction to explore. Compared to visually motivated tasks, exploration in non-visual tasks follows similar selection mechanisms, but occurs at a lower rate. This is consistent with the view that the non-visual task is the equivalent of a dual-task: it combines the instructed task with an uninstructed, perhaps even mandatory, exploratory behavior. Public Library of Science 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6014668/ /pubmed/29933381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198242 Text en © 2018 Abeles et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abeles, Dekel
Amit, Roy
Yuval-Greenberg, Shlomit
Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency
title Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency
title_full Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency
title_fullStr Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency
title_full_unstemmed Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency
title_short Oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: The role of visual saliency
title_sort oculomotor behavior during non-visual tasks: the role of visual saliency
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6014668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29933381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198242
work_keys_str_mv AT abelesdekel oculomotorbehaviorduringnonvisualtaskstheroleofvisualsaliency
AT amitroy oculomotorbehaviorduringnonvisualtaskstheroleofvisualsaliency
AT yuvalgreenbergshlomit oculomotorbehaviorduringnonvisualtaskstheroleofvisualsaliency