Cargando…
Single‐ Versus 2‐Stent Strategies for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials With Long‐Term Follow‐up
BACKGROUND: The majority of coronary bifurcation lesions are treated with a provisional single‐stent strategy rather than an up‐front 2‐stent strategy. This approach is supported by multiple randomized controlled clinical trials with short‐ to medium‐term follow‐up; however, long‐term follow‐up data...
Autores principales: | Ford, Thomas J., McCartney, Peter, Corcoran, David, Collison, Damien, Hennigan, Barry, McEntegart, Margaret, Hildick‐Smith, David, Oldroyd, Keith G., Berry, Colin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6015365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29802145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008730 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Coronary Artery Perforations: Glasgow Natural History Study of Covered Stent Coronary Interventions (GNOCCI) Study
por: Ford, Thomas J., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy in patients with angina and grey-zone fractional flow reserve values: a randomised clinical trial
por: Hennigan, Barry, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Clinical Outcomes Following Simple or Complex Stenting for Coronary
Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis
por: Zhang, Qun, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning on coronary artery function in patients with stable coronary artery disease
por: Corcoran, D., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR)
por: Collison, Damien, et al.
Publicado: (2021)