Cargando…

Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Frailty predicts poorer outcomes and decreased anticoagulation use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban versus warfarin in frail nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. METHODS AND RES...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martinez, Brandon K., Sood, Nitesh A., Bunz, Thomas J., Coleman, Craig I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6015429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008643
_version_ 1783334411093147648
author Martinez, Brandon K.
Sood, Nitesh A.
Bunz, Thomas J.
Coleman, Craig I.
author_facet Martinez, Brandon K.
Sood, Nitesh A.
Bunz, Thomas J.
Coleman, Craig I.
author_sort Martinez, Brandon K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Frailty predicts poorer outcomes and decreased anticoagulation use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban versus warfarin in frail nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using US MarketScan claims data from November 2011 to December 2016, we identified frail oral anticoagulant‐naïve nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with ≥12 months of continuous insurance coverage before oral anticoagulant initiation. Frailty status was determined using the Johns Hopkins Claims‐based Frailty Indicator score (≥0.20 indicating frailty). Users of apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban were separately 1:1 matched to warfarin users via propensity‐scores, with residual absolute standardized differences <0.1 being achieved for all covariates after matching. Patients were followed for up to 2 years or until an event, insurance disenrollment or end of follow‐up. Rates of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding were compared using Cox regression and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In total, 2700, 2784, and 5270 patients were included in the apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban 1:1 matched analyses to warfarin. At 2 years, neither apixaban nor dabigatran were associated with differences in the hazard of stroke or systemic embolism (HR=0.78; 95% CI=0.46–1.35 and HR=0.94; 0.60–1.45) or major bleeding (HR=0.72; 95% CI=0.49–1.06 and HR=0.87; 95% CI=0.63–1.19) versus warfarin. Rivaroxaban was associated with reduced stroke or systemic embolism at 2 years (HR=0.68; 95% CI=0.49–0.95) without significantly altering major bleeding risk (HR=1.07; 95% CI=0.81–1.32). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found rivaroxaban but not apixaban or dabigatran to be associated with reduced SSE versus warfarin in frail nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. No direct‐acting oral anticoagulants demonstrated a significant difference in major bleeding versus warfarin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6015429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60154292018-07-05 Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Martinez, Brandon K. Sood, Nitesh A. Bunz, Thomas J. Coleman, Craig I. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Frailty predicts poorer outcomes and decreased anticoagulation use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban versus warfarin in frail nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using US MarketScan claims data from November 2011 to December 2016, we identified frail oral anticoagulant‐naïve nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with ≥12 months of continuous insurance coverage before oral anticoagulant initiation. Frailty status was determined using the Johns Hopkins Claims‐based Frailty Indicator score (≥0.20 indicating frailty). Users of apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban were separately 1:1 matched to warfarin users via propensity‐scores, with residual absolute standardized differences <0.1 being achieved for all covariates after matching. Patients were followed for up to 2 years or until an event, insurance disenrollment or end of follow‐up. Rates of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding were compared using Cox regression and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In total, 2700, 2784, and 5270 patients were included in the apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban 1:1 matched analyses to warfarin. At 2 years, neither apixaban nor dabigatran were associated with differences in the hazard of stroke or systemic embolism (HR=0.78; 95% CI=0.46–1.35 and HR=0.94; 0.60–1.45) or major bleeding (HR=0.72; 95% CI=0.49–1.06 and HR=0.87; 95% CI=0.63–1.19) versus warfarin. Rivaroxaban was associated with reduced stroke or systemic embolism at 2 years (HR=0.68; 95% CI=0.49–0.95) without significantly altering major bleeding risk (HR=1.07; 95% CI=0.81–1.32). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found rivaroxaban but not apixaban or dabigatran to be associated with reduced SSE versus warfarin in frail nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. No direct‐acting oral anticoagulants demonstrated a significant difference in major bleeding versus warfarin. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6015429/ /pubmed/29654196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008643 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Martinez, Brandon K.
Sood, Nitesh A.
Bunz, Thomas J.
Coleman, Craig I.
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
title Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
title_full Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
title_fullStr Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
title_short Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
title_sort effectiveness and safety of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban versus warfarin in frail patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6015429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008643
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezbrandonk effectivenessandsafetyofapixabandabigatranandrivaroxabanversuswarfarininfrailpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT soodnitesha effectivenessandsafetyofapixabandabigatranandrivaroxabanversuswarfarininfrailpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT bunzthomasj effectivenessandsafetyofapixabandabigatranandrivaroxabanversuswarfarininfrailpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT colemancraigi effectivenessandsafetyofapixabandabigatranandrivaroxabanversuswarfarininfrailpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation